--Virtual
Quote from: medo on February 25, 2011, 04:52:37 PM
--Virtually track 6 dozens/or columns if you prefer/
2 3 2 1 3 2.......now start betting on the same 6 flat bet.
1 2 3 2 3 1.......3- rise next 6 bets to 3 units.
1 3 3 2 1 2.......9+ back to 1 unit.....and so on.
Rise 3 un when lose 5 bets,in next cycle of 6 bets
Rise 4 un when lose 6 bets,in next cycle of 6 bets.
Back to 1 un. whenever in plus.
You will find this bet very interesting easy to bet and profitable.
medo, your above description is unclear. you say -3, when all 6 bets were different? surely this should be -6?
And your next line, if you are flat betting then you won 3 and lost three, ending level? Or i must be missing something
Thanks
BW
I tried this on real money a won a few pounds . Tried it on tests and it works well.
I played it with this progression{= martingale.
My play often becomes too agressive and go nuts ( hard progressssion ), flat bet this could become maybe too much of a grind but still it's pretty good. :thumbsup:
I gotta test this some more.
Medo, how much do you raise it if you lose 4 of the bets?
Thanks
BW
30 years ago I developed system like that but bet 2 D against one (2:1):
D bet
1 bet 2/3
1 bet 2/3
2 bet 1/3
3 bet 1/2
2 bet 1/3
1 bet 2/3 and so on...but it works best with 7 in column, not 6.
It worked most of the time but sometimes even 6 times in row hit the same dozen but other times I won even 24 spins in row!
Your way 6 against 6 could happen that no hit even 12 spins in row! Not a splendid idea.
Hermes
The systems for dozens are very easy to program in excel.Take a sample of 250 spins and test your idea.I use the dozens and the columns very often in my strategy.I am rather successful see my stats.
Medo,
What are the pitfalls for this system?
John
The only pitfall would be losing a bankroll by wasting the time in casino.
Why not wait until we lose all 6 of cycle of 6 and use it as a trigger to bet the next cycle of 6? The chance is bigger that we get more hits.
By the way you can apply the same tactic to all ECs! It is more successful than on D/C. Example:
R bet R
R bet R
R bet R
B bet B
R bet R with progression. Bet flat the cycle of 5 if in plus next cycle of 5 the same if lost a cycle rise the next cycle one unit. Example:
* means loss
R*B
R*B
R R
B B
R R +1 unit next cycle of 5 the same bet. Secret: Cycle of 7 works better!
Hermes
Hello MEDO, thanks for your prompt response.
What kind progression shall I use in your system?
John
medo you are giving bread but where is the butter?
Hermes
I tested that system with progression. I ran into a choppy where dozens don't match previous dozen and the system loss.
John
Quote from: jrhelp007 on February 27, 2011, 04:42:18 PM
I tested that system with progression. I ran into a choppy where dozens don't match previous dozen and the system loss.
John
[/quote In other words you are not following rules mate.Why are you ppl.so ignorant.
I'm tired of chaps like you.
ITS NOT WORTH FEEDING YOU......NO MORE,[/color]
Medo,
First let me thanks you for the effort you put and your willingness to share your system.
Before you get excited and "VERBALLY ATTACK" me and others on this board, let me run by you how I played your system/approach using a single zero Roulette.
Please correct me if the approach is wrong:
1. I tracked 6 numbers and wrote down its dozen as the number appeared.
2. I started to bet 1 unit as follow:
Number captured 6, 33, 3, 1, 22, 16 it is mapped to dozens:
1, 3, 1, 1, 2, 2
Starting with a flat bet, meaning placing 1 unit , I placed a bet on the first dozen. Regardless win or loss, meaning if I won I removed the bet from the first dozen and moved it to the next location which was the 3rd dozen. If I loss on the first number/dozen, I still remained with 1 unit and placed a flat bet on the 3rd dozen, etc... the total movements/bets were for the duration of the 6 dozens/numbers.
Step 2: since I was in a negative I increased the bet to 3 unit following the latest 6 dozens. I played that. Once the total winning vs. loss became positive I lower the bet to 1 unit.
The problem started when I started to face the streaks where my bet following the dozen handed up on different dozens. Even when I won, it was only 1 bet out of the 5 losing bets.
My progression was 1,3,5,8, 13.
Please let me know if I played that correct. If I didn't please correct me.
Thanks,
John
Quote from: hermes on February 27, 2011, 04:05:13 PM
The only pitfall would be losing a bankroll by wasting the time in casino.
Why not wait until we lose all 6 of cycle of 6 and use it as a trigger to bet the next cycle of 6? The chance is bigger that we get more hits.
By the way you can apply the same tactic to all ECs! It is more successful than on D/C. Example:
R bet R
R bet R
R bet R
B bet B
R bet R with progression. Bet flat the cycle of 5 if in plus next cycle of 5 the same if lost a cycle rise the next cycle one unit. Example:
* means loss
R*B
R*B
R R
B B
R R +1 unit next cycle of 5 the same bet. Secret: Cycle of 7 works better!
Hermes
---And cycles of 8 the best....except that doz/col. are 2/1 bets
Here is my similar DOZENS idea:
Wait for 4 vertical non-matching consecutive (back to back) doubles then bet for a match using
1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4........etc
Forward 1 on a loss; back 2 on a win
Reset when level or ahead.
Matrix Grid of Seven (dozen results)
==============
2213321
2312233
1312311--+1@col2 (2nd@1)
3311221--+2@col2 (1st@1)
3333112
1231322--+1@col3 (1st@2)
2113331--+2@col5 (1st@1)
1232311--+0@col5 (3rd@1)
1232112
2322222--+0@col4 (3rd@1)
3123121
2222132
2222331
1111333--+1@col5 (2nd@1)
+7 in 98 spins.
highest bet=2
+22 in 266 spins
highest bet=3
+16 in 459 spins
highest bet=3
A.
Played short example session on BV nozero r.n.g.
2133313
3222122
3331113--+1@col1 (1st@2) Reset
3112321
1133323--+1@col2 (1st@2) Reset
3211313--+1@col5 (2nd@1) Reset
2322123--+0@col7 (3rd@1) Reset
3231312
1133111-- -3@col3 (3rd@2) go back 2 places
2122321--+4@col7 (1st@2) Reset
+4 in 70 spins
highest bet = 2
Working good so far...
A.
Quote from: buffalowizard on February 25, 2011, 05:11:03 PM
medo, your above description is unclear. you say -3, when all 6 bets were different? surely this should be -6?
And your next line, if you are flat betting then you won 3 and lost three, ending level? Or I must be missing something
Thanks
BW
I thought that was very clear, also i think john did it spot on but you will lose at times.
For interested peaple I have a SSB model for the dozens.
Quote from: schoenpoetser on March 15, 2011, 07:53:52 AM
For interested peaple I have a SSB model for the dozens.
Forgive my ignorance but what SSB means?????
I have developed a principle you can play continuous on special rows.I have called it S(hoe)Shine)Boy named to a story.I will attacht it to this reply.I did it before but I think an attachtment is temporily suitable.
Quote from: medo on March 15, 2011, 05:15:21 PM
Forgive my ignorance but what SSB means?????
shoe shine boy, its a system by schoenpoetser.
i have never used it, so i dont know much about it. i think its betting streets.