roulette computers | clocking vs automated timings

[Steve]

To make a few things clear, the main differences between the Hybrid (nolinks.hybridroulettecomputer.com) and my Uber computers are that the Hybrid:

* Takes timings automatically: no need to look at the wheel, unlike manual clocking errors.

* More accurate timings: With normal clocking computers, you click buttons to take timings (as the rotor and ball go around). The clicking errors are typically around 50ms. The Hybrid gets errors down to below 15ms, and it does it automatically - with your eyes closed, no clicking. I'm not talking about multiple revolutions, although this can be done too. I mean a single revolution. So it is far more accurate than any manual clocking computer. Unfortunately some people find it hard to accept this basic truth and vent on me personally. Its not my fault they only managed to copy 50 year old work. Some sellers claim their hardware is accurate to 0.0000001ms etc etc.

To elaborate, my Uber (manual clocking) hardware has accuracy to 1ms. Ok so it's not 0.00001ms. But given it has 1ms accuracy when clocking errors are a whopping 50ms, and the Uber has far better algorithms than other computers, the end accuracy is far better. See nolinks://roulettecomputers.com/ddt.htm for example. See one of my devices that has 0.000001ms hardware accuracy: nolinks://nolinks.roulettesystemanalysis.com/m/micro.wmv .. but with prediction accuracy same as my the free roulette computer I offer, as explained at nolinks://roulettecomputers.com/algorithm.html and nolinks://roulettecomputers.com/comparson.htm

As for diamond targeting and what a computer needs to do, anyone only need to read all of the pages at nolinks://roulettecomputers.com/howtomake.html .. but if you expect ball deceleration rate will stay the same even with different conditions like ball track grit, and if you expect the ball to bounce the same way on different rotor speeds, well good luck

[Steve]

-