Questions For Lanky

[Lanky]

Carpanta.

Seeing as I don't usually bet that way then I can't comment too much Mate.

But I know Victor has bet that way on live dealer Tables though.

I have on occasions bet 2x2 & then 3x3 A return of 9 .
Getting 125% profit on Layout of the original 4 Bet.

I am however willing to learn more...I am particularly interested in the RNG side of it.

Lanky

[admin]

Off topic replies have been moved to [link=nolinks://vlsroulette.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1201308369]This Thread[/link]

[Joker]

Hello Mr. Lanky how are you doing?

i have few questions...

for your starting unit.. do you use $1? or sometimes higher?

and my second question is WLWLWL pattern would kill LW and LLW pattern?

and my last questino is do you use JD or do you mostly stick with LD's ? thank you very much

Joker

[Lanky]

Hello Mr. Lanky how are you doing?

i have few questions...

for your starting unit.. do you use $1? or sometimes higher?

and my second question is WLWLWL pattern would kill LW and LLW pattern?

and my last questino is do you use JD or do you mostly stick with LD's ? thank you very much

Joker

Hi Joker

My starting Unit is What I make it on the day.

Like in the Casino Here In Sydney the Min Bet On The Dozens & Columns Is $10.
On Airball its $1

wLwLwL << would not kill the Lw Pattern In Fact Here You would win every bet on every 2nd spin if the Lw pattern is alive.
I will mark the bets like this Mate.[ ] >> [w]L[w]L[w]L << Bet here for the W to form again.

But Yes you are Right It does Kill the LLw pattern though.

Nice to hear from You Joker.

Your Friend

Lanky

[Joker]

Hello mr. lanky thak you so much... i have been studying more and more and learning more and more...

and of cource to get things are not easy, so i put lots of effort...

Mr. Lanky if you start with $5 or $10 bet... we must have big bank roll in case of losing streak.. am i right?

however, i am sure it is quicker to reach $100-150...

so mr. Lanky do you prefer to start with $1 or $5 or higher?  

thank you so much..

Joker

[Lanky]

Hi Joker

Mate If I am playing Airball I bet $2 units.

If on live Table I have no choice I have to bet a $10 unit.

Your welcome Joker

Lanky

[Joker]

Thank you so much... Mr. Lanky... finally i am pretty comfortable with your system and 6 point division... of cource not 100% but things are going well...

And your system is winning system.... no doubt about it... I am also trying to figure out how to win even chance since my local casino doesn't have roulette... the closest one is 2 hours away... but as I found out there is no way we can win with even chance for long run... betting last dozen give a lot more chance to win...

thank you so much.. i am sure i will have more question to ask.. thank you so much for your help always and hope your health is better and so does your wife's

Joker

[ikarianman]

hello Lanky!how are you??I am trying to understand the method and I am going good so far but I have some questions for you when you find some time:)
I understand that I will use these 3 patterns
1)Lw
2)Lww
3)LLW
so lets say we have this:

wLnolinkslwlw  ->I wait for the next L and then bet for 1 w to come right?that is because I hope the Lw is activated after 3 repeats

lets say that the L came after 2 w's.my series from the beggining would look like
wLnolinkslwlnolinksl  now I bet for the next w to come.
ok lets say another 2 w's  came... the series from  the start will look like:
w{(Lw)w}w(Lw){(Lw)w}w{(Lw)w}

my lw pattern which is inside () has repeated 4 times!
and a new pattern developed, the Lww which has repeated for 3 times inside the {} so its active now.
my question is:
do I kill the Lw and continue with the Lww or I keep both of them??

that was an example ,I am confused with :can I play the 2 or 3 patterns at the same time?and when is time to kill a pattern??the rule says after 3 L's right?but except this occasion when else??
thanks in advance!

[Lanky]

Hi Guys.
Just to let You all know I did answer this with ikarianman in Msn Chat...But I forgot to put what I said here..so I will do it now.

I understand that I will use these 3 patterns
1)Lw
2)Lww
3)LLW
so lets say we have this:

OK here is the problem.
They should look like this
1)Lw
2)LLw
3)Lww

The reason for that is because the Lww Pattern the way I play it these days is activated only after the LLw has appeared.

It may be easier to for You if I say.
The Lw(w) Pattern is an extension of the LL(w) Pattern.
I am trying to win on the 3rd spin of each pattern.
But the LLw has to come 1st before it is activated.

So Your example here of

w{(Lw)w}w(Lw){(Lw)w}w{(Lw)w}

Would look like this if I was Playing it as I would not have bet Yet.
wLnolinkslwlnolinksl << bet here for the W to come.
If it was another L it would be now LL < I would bet for the W to come again and then Stop.

Your Friend.

Lanky.

[Natural9]

Hi Guys.
Just to let You all know I did answer this with ikarianman in Msn Chat...But I forgot to put what I said here..so I will do it now.

OK here is the problem.
They should look like this
1)Lw
2)LLw
3)Lww

The reason for that is because the Lww Pattern the way I play it these days is activated only after the LLw has appeared.

It may be easier to for You if I say.
The Lw(w) Pattern is an extension of the LL(w) Pattern.
I am trying to win on the 3rd spin of each pattern.
But the LLw has to come 1st before it is activated.

So Your example here of
Would look like this if I was Playing it as I would not have bet Yet.
wLnolinkslwlnolinksl << bet here for the W to come.
If it was another L it would be now LL < I would bet for the W to come again and then Stop.

Your Friend.

Lanky.

Also Lanky you would play the LLW pattern till it was stopped by an LW then wait three time  for LW the play the W after the L but if waiting for LW three times and LLW formed  that is trigger to play LLW again

Is that correct mate

Regards Rodney

[Lanky]

Also Lanky you would play the LLW pattern till it was stopped by an LW then wait three time  for LW the play the W after the L but if waiting for LW three times and LLW formed  that is trigger to play LLW again

Is that correct mate

Regards Rodney

Hi Mate.

The LwL Pattern stops the Lww.............Not the LLw Pattern.
Which is what I think You meant to say anyhow Cobber.

Depending on where and what has happened the LLw can extend to these patterns
Lww-<< LwL kills It.
LLLw- << LLLL kills it.

But for arguement sake lets say that the very same pattern that I was waiting on repeated itself again after the LLw hit at the end of those Lw Notations.

Like this. Bets Marked in Brackets (o)

wLnolinksLwLnolinksL(L)(w) <>wLw(w)wLw(L)(w)wwL < bet for W to come here.= 5 bets for 3 Wins.

Now breaking that down I count the 1st Lw off the last of the LLw Pattern = L(Lw)

Like this. (I will take the bet off the Lww Pattern to make it clearer.)

wLnolinksLwLnolinksL(Lw) <>w(Lw)ww(Lw) << see the 3 Lw's Clearer Now ??.

Ok now lets do it without the LLw Pattern at the end...This time it was Lw at the end of the 1st Tram & then the repeat again.

wLnolinksLwLnolinksL(w) <>wL(w)wwL(w)L(w)wwL< bet for W to come here.= 4 bets for 4 wins

Good On Ya Mate.

Lanky.

[ozshabs]

Hi Lanky

I have tried to create a spreadsheet for the 35pt divisor plan. Since you are the "MASTER", I would really appreciate if you could test it and provide some feedback for any errors and/or improvements.

Cheers

[Lanky]

Hi ozshabs .

Mate You Exaggerate...I am no MASTER I am just a Roulette Student like You doing My best.

Mate it is fine I tested for 10 losses in a row and 2 Wins +9

Then for 20 losses in a row and then 4 wins for a profit.

My Friend I have 2 suggestions for You.

1) If you do it as a 36/1 Divisor I think that more people would understand it or relate to it better as its in 36 number sequences and they would find it easier to see the Math.
And the bets would be a Tad Lower as You get further into the progression.

2) You can always add a Safety Brake after say between 6-12
lost bets in a Row.

Like after 6 Lost bets You could then take the Divisor to 72 or in your case 70

You will need an extra win or so to balance the books...but it will keep Your losses lower.

The earlier you add it the lower the Bets are kept....Matty Mazz does this the way He plays and is having good success with it....He also plays a 35/1 Divisor.

Of Course in the end the Player will Play with what suits Him Best......But with Me its not How Much I Win...Its How Much I don't Lose that tells the tale at the end of the Year.

Good OnYa Mate...Your a Good Bloke.

Lanky.

[Lohnro]

GREAT spreadsheet ozshabs, well done mate!

Good suggestions from the "MASTER" too.

[Boo_Ray]

hey, great sheet ozshabs
could you do that you can manualy pick divisor?

@lanky
If I play splits should divisor be 18?

[Boo_Ray]

-