Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Marigny de Grilleu - +1 Unit ...

Started by I have cookies, March 06, 2011, 03:51:50 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

I have cookies


QuoteIf you guys keep feeding the troll he's never gonna go away.

All it is - a funny experiment - no need to take it so serious.

I know or are pretty sure Marigny will tank as all other methods - but i am curios do if the swings are less aggressive if you compare it toward other ways - like try to flat betting using FTL or DBL ... i assume we will find out ...

I will open up my material and update my self about the details for each method and post them step by step.
Now i will take my daughter to school :)

I have cookies


@Mike

Hello ...

I post about Marigny's original work as you mention in previous post (with clear and strict rules) and you run your simulations and tests.

In return you also make two to three small softwares for me of my own development - like the software below as attach file.

Deal ?

Mike

@ IHC,

I thought you were going to post the rules anyway?  :-\

To be honest, this doesn't seem like a very attractive deal to me. You've said yourself that the methods will probably tank (and I'm 99.9% sure that they will), but you want me to not only simulate them but also write other programs which may take hours or even days. Also it means that I'm the one doing all the work but anyone who reads the board will get the benefit, which doesn't seem fair at all.

I've wasted enough time writing code for systems which ALL turned out to be junk, so I'd rather focus on more productive avenues.

I have cookies


@Mike

I understand your point of view - you don't have time to waste like me during day time.
I don't play roulette systems and sure all methods we know of tank - but that does not prevent me from having fun as it is a hobby.
So i assume two pepole can observe the same situation with different values towards what is what.

Cheers

I have cookies

Three states

If you use singles and series as two opposite sides of a coin 1/2 then we will have three states.
If singels chop one side get stronger and grow and if series chop the other side get stronger and grow - simple.
If none grow and get stronger they hovering with one of each present.

Definition of correction - my opinion.

If I measuring singels and only allow singel series being present among does - then if they stop to get stronger and grow - then there is only two things that can happen.
The singels and the series can start to chop once each - hovering at zero point where the STD does not get weaker or stronger - this part is part of correction and it can come with a small, medium or large wave as anything else.
When series start to chop as opposite effect we have a raw drawdown of correction and the STD get weaker.

The three states - waves - can come in any combination - but one common observation after many sampels of 100 000s is that the state of hovering and raw draw-downs comes together witch is our tendency towards to capture does and gain at least +1 unit.

March

One thing I like is when and why some one would place hes first bet to capture a tendency towards a small, medium or large correction.
There exist three ways you can use as tendency.
One is to capture a small quick draw-down after 3.0 or 3.5 STD as example above using singels one could pick the first series that appears after a strong imbalance to gain +1 - if a loss then some one would wait for a significant change witch would be two series that chop or that at least three or four then wait for all formation of two to appear and attack.
One other way is the reverse of above where you wait for a significant change first and make one attack and if a loss then you attack after the first singels series appear.
And last some one following one of does two principals but does not place any bet after obtain one fictive win.
Other ways is to wait for a significant change and attack and if a loss you have to get a more significant change then the previous one before you are allow to attack again.

I have cookies


Flat betting.

The number of won units is to be divided by the root from the placed bets.

0.5 Keep looking
1.0 Keep looking
1.5 Hint
2.0 Interesting
2.5 Good /
3.0 Very good
3.5 Super
4.0 Dream on
4.5 You wish
5.0 Forget it
5.5 Never in an life time
6.0 The end of roulette as we know it

albertojonas

Quote from: I have cookies link=topic=18185. msg130911#msg130911 date=1299754693
Flat betting.

The number of won units is to be divided by the root from the placed bets.

0. 5 Keep looking
1. 0 Keep looking
1. 5 Hint
2. 0 Interesting
2. 5 Good /
3. 0 Very good
3. 5 Super
4. 0 Dream on
4. 5 You wish
5. 0 Forget it
5. 5 Never in an life time
6. 0 The end of roulette as we know it

this is the most marvelous stuff i read about in all forums about roulette
:yahoo:

simon

Quote from: albertojonas on June 03, 2011, 01:47:30 AM
this is the most marvelous stuff I read about in all forums about roulette
:yahoo:

....... well you're easily impressed.  it would be more marvelous if it was of any use.  some people sure have alot of time on their hands.

albertojonas

it has the use it is purposed. . .

check how effective is the system you are playing.

just calculate the Estat and bet on events.

Nay sayers are a plague.  :give_rose:

albertojonas

-