Reverse Numbers and 1-9 system

[Carlitos]

Hi Alfa Street,



You say that the zero's are very important. But there are not much zero's are there?


Unless, you count 10, 20, 30 and 19 and 28 as zero's. Otherwise you only have the 0  as zero. As it doesn't always show i'am intrested how it can play then an important role?  





Carlitos  8-)

[Talesman]

Jakkalsdraai

I copied your plan, reverse numbers only, for some free time testing.  Tried it the other evening.

I liked the plan for its simplicity, payback and ease of placement if you use streets and splits as well as straight up.

It worked a heck of a lot better on a 00 wheel than it did a 0 wheel when using actuals from casinos. Maybe because of the wheel layout.

Playing it for 4 wasn't ideal.

Playing it for 3 was better sometimes, sometimes not.

Discouraged, I tried one more thing.  That is to play it continuously.  essentially, up one on a loss and down 2 on a win.  Except for several files which were short, each file I played was a winner.  I am willing to say right now that I have no doubts based on testing on over 150 actuals that if my target was between 90-100 units and stopping - that is very doable on American wheels. Assuming of course you have the bankroll and are willing to take the risk. 

A way for surviving is to not progress until previous winnings have been depleted.  That only extends your table time.  It doesn't really help you to reach your goal.

I was wondering if you ever tried continuous betting in the manner I outlined?

[Jakkalsdraai]

 ;)Hi Talesman,

No mate, I haven't tried it that way. Neither have I tried it on the 00 wheel.

Although I haven't played this in a long time cause ultimately I guess it looses in the longterm. I must say though that I still believe this can be utilized in some kind of system, cause they definately hit close to each other. Like I've said I've seen the results board a couple of times with 7-8 out of 10 being reverse numbers (or what I called reverse numbers). Still believe this could be turned into a successful system. Maybe just not my way.

This system was originally posted a long time ago by myself. Because you have brought it up now (no problem for doing so mate!) some members might read the disagreement between myself and TCS. I just want to clear the air and say that I was too quick on my high horse so please ignore that. Really my first attempt at a proper system (all testing done manually as well lolol-pen and paper) So I wrongly didn't appreciate TCS's comments and took them the wrong way.

Anyhow, I would be interested in any further development and improvements from here on by any member on this system.

Cheers
Jakk

[TwoCatSam]

Jakk

I'm good!  I'm a hard-headed ol' fart and sometimes I come across wrong.  As with the 1 vs 3 crossings with winkel. 

NOW....believe it or don't....I've been doing a random study of the reverse numbers and here's what I'm thinking.

When 23 comes, bet on 32 for ten spins.  If it comes within ten, bet on 23 for ten spins and so on.  If you don't get a winner in ten spins, stop on that number.  You could be betting three numbers at once.

A single number progression could carry you far before you tanked. 

It is a very interesting phenomenon.  Another is when a double, 4 7 23 23...bet the 23 for ten spins.  I kept books on this with real money and I know it works.

I sometimes think it's the regularity that works; nothing else.  Like this:  When 1 follows 34, bet the 1 ten spins.  Do it every time.

Anyway, I'm still looking at it daily!

Sam

[Jakkalsdraai]

  Very interesting look on things Sam.

I'll have a look at it for sure.

Cheers mate

Jakk

[Jakkalsdraai]

-