Is It Possible?

[curious]

Ken

Please consider this an honest question for debate.  Taking your statement:  "NO, if I am only allowed to stick to a couple methods and NEVER change them."

Are you saying that once upon a time these methods worked but now they don't?  Did the game change?  Did the wheel change?  Why would something work and then quit?

We all know a system has ups and downs.  Are you hoping you halt the system just before the down and start another just as it picks up steam?  Do you ever go back to the original?

Sam

I think Ken means dropping a method that is losing at THIS table and starting up with a different method.  I also think he means selecting the method to be used based on what is actually going on.

Perhaps Ken will clarify this.

[Mr J]

"Are you saying that once upon a time these methods worked but now they don't?  Did the game change?  Did the wheel change?  Why would something work and then quit?

We all know a system has ups and downs.  Are you hoping you halt the system just before the down and start another just as it picks up steam?" >>> Curious is correct more or less. I was a bit vague. sorry.

I have QUIT around 17 methods that I actually played. The reason? It started tanking or never even showed a small profit. I have quit around 50 methods that I only played at home (no money). I currently play around 3-5 methods at the casino. Why won't these fail? Of course they might BUT I brought up a point a while back that MOST here probably dont remember.

Why is it, that alot (not all) of my newer ideas LAST LONGER? Meaning, method after method after method are lasting LONGER before failing? Coincidence? I say no. A method of mine 8 years ago should be no better or no worse than today? Thats what the MATH (cough) says!  Ken

[mistarlupo]

I figured out the other day that in the last 3 years I have over 5000 hours of practice time in.  Do you have that kind of dedication?

5000 hours of testing?! Maybe you should've learned programming.

[Coxx16]

Spike does not work on a fixed system I think. He studies patterns, but each decision he makes is unique. It would probably be too time consuming to program. It it could be programmed at all.

[Mr J]

Correct, it cant be, its based on a FEELING. Thats the beauty of HIS method and AP (cough), they cant be RXed/tested so they are off the hook.  Ken

[Nathan Detroit]

If someones approach cannot be  tested it drives the mathboyzz up the wall while screaming foul.

[kav]

any outcome is equally probable after any pattern

From now on, every time I read the BS about roulette prediction I will keep posting this. Until someone can prove the contrary.

[Mr J]

Everything alright today Kav?  Ken

[Spike]

5000 hours of testing?! Maybe you should've learned programming.>>>

What I do can't be programmed, its been tried.

[Spike]

any outcome is equally probable after any pattern>>>

Actually, the patterns don't exixt, they're in your head. Any outcome is equally probably after any other outcome, thats what makes it beatable.

[kav]

any outcome is equally probable after any pattern>>>

Actually, the patterns don't exixt, they're in your head. Any outcome is equally probably after any other outcome, thats what makes it beatable.

That's nonsense, what would make it beatable would be to define that specific outcomes are followed by specific outcomes. only then would we be able to predict something.
If everything is equally possible there is no way for any bet selection to have any advantage, so cut the crap.

[Spike]

If everything is equally possible there is no way for any bet selection to have any advantage, so cut the stuff.>>>

That the outcomes are unconnected is the ONLY totally dependable fact in the game of roulette. And because its 100% true on every spin, its also its exploitable weak spot. But you keep looking for other facts about roulette that happen on every spin, maybe there are others, who knows.

[bombus]

The past spins give clues to POSSIBLE future spins...

Amazing.

Any outcome is equally probably after any other outcome...

Truly amazing.

------------------------

I'm off to the casino to play this now!

I'll report back my results.

[Spike]

Just the truth. Past spins give clues to possible outcomes BECAUSE they are unconnected. Because its dependable. What more can I say, I just handed it to you on a plate..

[kav]

Truly amazing.

Go play your own system called truly amazing.

[kav]

-