9 number repeaters for Rapid Roulette (Touchbet)-RNG

[hideseek]

Hi All,
       I am a regular looser in RNG! Last week I was playing with this system, for ~7hrs and made ~$4000. Unfortunately when I was playing the next day, I hit my last leg of progression 3 times and all my profits gone in no time. So I tweaked my system a little bit and putting it here for your comments and for right divisor plan.
This system is similar to the one 12 # repeaters by Rpro75, although I discovered his systems now.

Here is the system:
Waite for 9 #s with just 1 repeat. Then place bets on those 9 # (Hey,if you include the repeater it is 10 #s). If no repeat delete the oldest one and add the new one and continue with the progression. My tweak is to waite for the 1 repeater to come before start betting. This avoids (I hope) long progression. Usually I am getting a win in ~7 spins.Yes there must be 1 repeat.Without this tweak I have encountered 21 spins no repater! I am attaching the progression file and RX chart for your comments.

Suggest me correct divisor plan. I am still trying to learn Lanky's 6 point divisor.I am interested some one to code this for me in RX.

Thanks
HS

[Lanky]

Suggest me correct divisor plan

Hi hideseek.

If I understand this correctly your playing 9 numbers at a time.

IF I am right then I would suggest You should use a 36/1 Divisor.

Your Friend.

Lanky.

[Jettonbuster]

 I am a regular loser in RNG! Last week I was playing with this system, for ~7hrs

Don't be fooled with these RNG, I talk out of experience....
Never play more then 20-30 minutes strait, after that it becomes more difficult to stay in +++.
Also never come back a few ours later or the day after, the RNG casino will go against you.

Connect the 3th day after last play.

Jettonbuster.

[hideseek]

Hi Lanky,
            Yes I play 9 numbers, and they pay 34 units on a win. So the divisor should be 34/1. I am not clear "on when to incease the divisor and when to decrease it".
Thanks
HS

[Lanky]

Hi Lanky,
            Yes I play 9 numbers, and they pay 34 units on a win. So the divisor should be 34/1. I am not clear "on when to incease the divisor and when to decrease it".
Thanks
HS

You only recieve 34 units back on a winning number and not the usual 36 units return

Lanky.

[hideseek]

Yes Lanky, Rapid roulette is 34 only. I am not sure why did they reduce 2 unit.  You can't bet more than 35 u in one # otherwise your winning will be more than 1200 u then you need to pay tax!

It is from Bally's company. Just like a slot machine, with RNG software. All I learned is that it has 2 chips, one for generating random numbers and another for iterating function. It has a Mac OS, which determines the winning etc.

@Jetton, you are right, never play more than 30 min.

[hideseek]

Hi Lanky,
          I am attaching my 34/1 divisor plan, as I understood. I am adding my loss with 10 units profit target, for the divisor. But I am not seeing any difference in deciding the next bet size. It looks the same as my own progression. The yellow highlight is my divisor approach. Am I calculating it wrong?
Thanks
HS

[hideseek]

I think I got it wrong in the above post. Now I have modified. Please check this and correct if I am wrong.

[hideseek]

Why nobody is able to suggest me the correct divisor? Is it so complicated or is it a perfect looser system? During my play, I found this system was making almost $100 an Hr  If you can tweak the progression slighlty then you are all set to rock

[Lanky]

Why nobody is able to suggest me the correct divisor? Is it so complicated or is it a perfect loser system? During my play, I found this system was making almost $100 an Hr   If you can tweak the progression slighlty then you are all set to rock

OK My Friend then Put some Lw notations up here and I will do the Divisor for You.

Just put when they won and lost like this.

LLLLwwZnolinksLwLwLww etc.

Lanky.

[hideseek]

Hi Lanky,
             Here is the look If I play continous 9 numbers
LLWWLLWLWLLLWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLWLLLLLWLLWLLLLWLWWLLLLWLLLLLLLWWLLLLLLLWLLLLLWLLLLWLLWLLLLLLLLLLLW
I will post the next session with the modified approach, ie, wait for 1 hit and start the progession.
Thanks
HS

[hideseek]

Just wait for 1 hit then start betting:
1.W
2.LLW
3.W
4.W
5.LLW
6.LLLLLLLLLLW-----------------> 10 Ls
7.W
8.LLLLW
9.LLW
10.LLLLLLLW--------------------->7Ls
11.LLW
12.LLLLLLLLLW------------------->9Ls
13.W
14.W
15.LW
16.LLW
17.W
18.LLLW
19.LLW
20.W
21. W
22.LLLW
23.LLLLLLLLLLW---------------------------------------------> 10 Ls
24.LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLW--------------------> 18 L followed by a hit
25.LLLLLW

Thanks
HS

[Lanky]

Hi Lanky,
             Here is the look If I play continous 9 numbers
LLWWLLWLWLLLWWLLLLLLLLLLLLLWLLLLLWLLWLLLLWLWWLLLLWLLLLLLLWWLLLLLLLWLLLLLWLLLLWLLWLLLLLLLLLLLW
I will post the next session with the modified approach, ie, wait for 1 hit and start the progession.
Thanks
HS

Hi hideseek

LLWWLLWLWL-4w/10-LLWWLLLLLL-6w/20-LLLLLLLWLL-7w/30-LLLWLLWLLL-9w/40-LWLWWLLLLW-13w/50-LLLLLLLWWL-15w/60-LLLLLLWLLL-16w/70-LLWLLLLWLL-18w/80-WLLLLLLLLL-19w/90-LLW-20w/93

There's You problem right there My Friend

20wins/in 93 spins =21.5% Win Strike rate.

Mate My best advice to You is to find something else.

The win strike rate on this is terrible.
I would never play this.

Your Friend.

Lanky.

[hideseek]

Hi Lanky,
           How about the next approach. Out of 25 attempts, 21 times I could hit less than 6 spins. Please advise me on this. I have tried several systems, nothing allowd me to win beyond $500 bucks. With this system, I went upto ~4000 bucks, that too in RNG!
Thanks
HS

[Lanky]

Hi Lanky,
          How about the next approach. Out of 25 attempts, 21 times I could hit less than 6 spins. Please advise me on this. I have tried several systems, nothing allowd me to win beyond $500 bucks. With this system, I went upto ~4000 bucks, that too in RNG!
Thanks
HS

Hi Mate

Well I made it 26Wins/from 104 spins=25% Win Strike rate.

Slightly better then before but thats 20/93+26/104=46 Wins from 197 spins=23.3% Win Rate.

And if I understand You correctly your getting paid odds of 33/1=34 back and there is 36 numbers.

Now I am no Math expert but it looks to Me that you are playing against a house edge of 8.33%

That's worse then the 2.7% on a single Zero wheel and the 5.4% on a Double Zero wheel.

And if I am right and Your playing 9 numbers you will get very big Drawdowns playing this at different times.

Your Friend

Lanky.

[Lanky]

-