The 21 Gun Salute

[MATTJONO]

Hi Bombus,
I have to agree with you on the amount of numbers we are betting 21 seems to be the max we should consider, however I have done a short test on the 1eva side.
Below is the first betting of 15 numbers and how they will look when playing the 5 sections of 3 neighbouring pockets (no overlapping)
0   
5   
4   
23   
36   
32   
2   
31  (TRIGGER) we would now bet these sections next for a attack of 7 spins
[disk]10,23,8,11,36,13,21,2,25,0,32,15,9,31,14[/disk]

-15 number bets
-attacked for 7 spins then retracked
-after an attack we can start looking for a new set of ancors tracking from 4 spins back


60 SPIN SESSION
32   
21   
0   
5   
4   
23   
36   
32   
2   
31   15 numbers (bet for 7 spins)
11   w
16   l
0   w
9   w
19   l
26   w
11   w
12   15 numbers (bet for 7 spins)
33   l
12   w
28   w
34   l
19   w
32   l
28   w
26   
14   
11   15 numbers (bet for 7 spins)
33   l
5   l
31   w
12   w
6   l
32   w
14   w
22   15 numbers (bet for 7 spins)
18   w
33   l
13   l
9   w
18   w
31   w
12   w
27   
26   15 numbers (bet for 7 spins)
12   w
29   w
32   l
9   w
8   l
3   w
30   l
33   
9   
14   
1   
34   
18   
18   
1   


60 spins
35 bets placed (maybe as many bets as we are going to get in a 60 spin session)

W= 22
L= 13

total profit = + 267units


MATTJONO

[simon]

I tried playing this system today at virtual roulette at my local slot parlor (betting 21 numbers) and could never get more than 2 anchor sections down between no more bets, as there is less than a minute to place bets between spins.  I guess it's possible but I would have to get much faster, using both hands, kind of like learning to type at the roulette betting layout "keyboard."

[Pedro]

Wow just came accross this, and it looks very promising .
What has happened since the last post, a couple of months ago, is it still going strong ?

Thanks for sharing this Bombus,

Cheers Pedro

[ironguy]

hi bombus

first sorry for my bad english
congratulations for your system seems to be good
just one question  : did you test it on RNG roulette and live roulette (ave you got results for these two games)

thanks for your answer

[Jeromin]

Just had a session today, on a automated  single zero roulette. I wish I had actually written the results, because it was quite incredible. I played a simple way: bet till I get L twice at any point, then retrack from the losing number. That is, twice L,  not necessarily in succession.

e.g.
LWWL
WWLWWL
WLL
etc.

I had a 8W 2L, followed by a 9W 2L, followed by a 5W 2L. Then a 1W 2L, which seemed to be the end of the lucky strike, but no. Another 8 or 9W, lost track at that point. It's a motorized roulette, so there's no DS, but somehow, there's a regularity that this system exploited well today. The only other variation  applied was that if a loss was on the edge of a group, I counted it as a win, since it was close to the tendency. I got a few of those. The betting opportunities didn't take too long to arrive either, no more than about ten spins, which in touchscreen, roulette is about 60 seconts appart.
I also noticed that, once I lost a second time, if the first two results where close by, the next few where likely to be close too: in the same 12 pocket section of the wheel, a pattern I also profited from.
All in all, 350 units turned into 1250 ( highest was 1380 units ) and a very enjoyable session that I hope wasn't pure luck.

[keel44]

Hows about this betting strategy:

If the first bet is a W:  go for a W for only 2 more times max (try for 2 out of 3 wins if next bet is L) Go for 3 W in a row
If the first bet is a L:  go for 2 more wins UNLESS Loss again, then stop

[petquesha]

We need more testing on this system.
Must be able to test this between us if programming is to difficult.
i will start handtesting today on my Hamburg nr collection , will test the flatbet 2 bet way,seems the safest and most easy way to play / test.

Will post some results soon.

If we all do about 2000 nrs then should have lots off info on this system..!

kind regards,

Petquesha

[Jeromin]

I'm on, though 2000 spins will be slow. I guess by the end I'll know the wheel back to front, so it won't be all a waste. I've had some success with long series of wins ( real money ), so I'll check my method ( bet till I get a total of two L ) which includes your method as a subset.
I'll post results as I go.
As I play it, I've noticed that quite often an L is on a borderline number, in which case, nearly always the next result is a W. I'm also interested in testing the following 21 gun salute variation: bet on the last three results, regardless of placement. That is, even if they are close by, bet systematicaly on the last three and the three left and right of each ( the so called 3 Eva side ). Maybe reduce the nunmber on the third oldest so that the bet is only 18 numbers, such that a W to L 1:1 ratoio breaks even. I'm really trying to avoid progressions, too nerve wrecking.

[petquesha]

Thx Jeromin, thats  a good start.

[petquesha]

After 300 spins negative BIG TIME, I stopped testing..................sry
Back to law of 3rd for me.

goodl uck ,
Petquesha

[betatester]

Hello forumers.
I did finish my tests on this system.
Bad news.
The code was difficult to figure out. The system is difficult too to play on a live casino.
And yes, eventually you will have long runs of matches in wich you touch your bet at first.
But, If you progress you will tank.
If you play flat bet, you are playing a chance with 21/37 prob. to hit, so this almost 57 every 100 runs.
a 57% has also its variability.
When you win you have +15. When you lose -21
4 wins didn't serve to keep you in save 3 loses.
Many times the number that comes brings you to a "new" situation with all the conditions meet, while you just lost the first 21, a new set must be prepared... if done with computer it's easy, but in real situations it could be a mess...

I was interested in this system just because it wasn't easy to program.
But as always, more imagination and a more difficult code doesn't gives you a better bet selection !!!

There is always more simple ways to play more than 18 numbers.
The two halves of the wheel have a very good distributions on reds/lows and black/higs... and so on...
Right the zero:
ALL THE BLACK, LOWS (2-4-6-8-10-11-13-15-17) & ALL THE REDS HIGHS (19-21-23-25-27-30-32-34-36)
Left the zero:
ALL THE BLACKS, HIGHS (20-22-24-26-28-29-31-33-35) & ALL THE REDS LOWS, (1-3-5-7-9-12-14-16-18)

Choose half wheel and then add a full group from the other side.
If you choose Right, then add (1-3-5-7-9, or 20-22-24-26-28... or some of the 4# groups 29-31-33-35 or 12-14-16-18)

18+5= 23 or 18+4= 22 numbers.

You deal with less "jettons" (the bet in LOW or HIGH, or BLACK or RED must be 18 times higher (18 units) + 4/5 units in the other's side group.

Just my advice.

All the best.

Betatester.

[betatester]

-