.
why dont you just tell me the bet?I promise to donate 25% of my winnings to any charity of your choice plus another 25% for you to keep.You can get a legal adviser to draft out a black and white and I will be happy to sign it.I can even provide a bankroll with your name as the account holder just in case you think I will run away with my winnings.Sounds fair enough Ryan?
Sir,I play pretty big bets if you know me personally and most of the time with a 5 figure bankroll,we will make lots of money for the charity and ourselves.
If you think I am lying then you can ask people around here..... 8)
Ryan bluff , i have sent you a pm
Ryan,
I will be testing your bet and looking for a more profitable one. I am sorry to hear about your situation and I wish you all the best. I admire you wanting to help in the name of cancer research. I would be more than happy to donate the majority of my winnings to cancer research as it effects someone I know personally! I look forward to working with you soon.
Ryan, your proposition sounds very fair.
May I have the opportunity to ask in the utmost good will if you are using some of Charles Edward Hampshire's concepts, as you use "trap the change" and other common terms? It will be pleasant to know.
There are for sure good causes which could be funded given you know how to win sustainedly.
Thanks again and hope you find fellow forum members to help in your quest to help cancer research.
Your fellow,
Victor
Welcome to the forum, Ryan / Charles II!
Thank you for your generous offer, all the best to you, sir.
So you share with us a consistent winning bet, but we need to find one of the others, right?
Regards,
m
Here is a consistent winning bet for you all>>>
By consistant, you mean it wins more than it loses and you can prove this with math?
Ryan,
Welcome to the forum sir.
I on behalf of the Bet Quest private roulette group thank you for sharing with us.
We will extensively test your bet and look into all variations of it.
If we ever do actually find a consistent winning bet, then you have our word that we will do all we can to support your and our causes to help make a positive impact in the world.
Regards,
Marven
OK, this is a puzzle......
Looking at the letters in table 2, I notice there are six columns. No two of them are the same length (have the same number of dozens). The shortest is one and the longest is seven.
My first quest--putting on my fedora--will be to determine why columns are a particular length.
Indiana Sam
Hi Ryan,
Sorry to hear about your health problem.
Marven,Madupz4 and I are in the same group. We share the same vision of turning gamble to something meaningful to the world.
You will have our words if we are able to find the with your help..
All the best.
PH
Quote from: TwoCatSam on February 16, 2009, 10:58:49 PMMy first quest--putting on my fedora--will be to determine why columns are a particular length.
Hi Sam,
I believe the answer of this question is in the following sentence:
"
Have there be two dozens in a column like this:"
The result is as follows:
1st column: groups
A and B only
2nd column: groups
B and C only
3rd column: groups
A and B only etc.
Basically, when a third group appear -> start a new column.
Regards,
m
mistarlupo
Tossing the ol' fedora on the hat rack. All I had to do was read! Thanks!!
Sam
RyanBuff,
Thank you for sharing and good luck with your health condition.
Question - Example 2 #13
9.A,10.A,11.B,12.A - Should we bet the change here (C)?
Thanks. RP.
Ryan,
Before sending you anything, How do we justify a bet is a constant winning bet?
thanks
PH
Ryanbluff
Thank for this. I have spent a lot of time playing dozen bets and have noticed that after a dozen goes missing for 5 spins there is often a very high probability that it will appear in the next 3 spins. However I had never though to try this method.
It just provides further proof that you can be so close to a winning bet but at the same time the left side of the brain won't let the right side do what it's designed for - pure consciousness.
regards
Graeme
I am also only too willing to donate if the bet is found.We all know,i guess,someone touched by this awful disease.
My best wishes go to you Ryanbuff
The Spiders Kiss
I;m sorry to hear about your health problem.
Good luck
Hello RyanBuff,
Sorry to hear about your case.I will pray for your health.
I am willing to take up your challenge and donate 20% of my winning towards your cause.
I will play full time if need arise.
Regards
sniper
Hi Ryan.
Yes Mate sorry to hear of Your illness.
My Wife & I will pray for You.
I will try & explain what I see here in Your System Mate.
I am an old guy so take it easy on Me if I don't explain it right or I have the Bull by the Balls.
Mate from what I can see of Your System its an off shoot of what we call The LD = Last two dozens that came...... with a twist to it after WW comes You bet the furthest back Dozen for a win We would class that as an L.
I won't go through the A B C things as You know them already ....LOL
So if WW< > you bet the furthest back dozen to win .
So this pattern would be good for you then...
WW L<< in our terms>> would mean you have just won the last 3 bets.(nolinks) your way.
1x1 W+1
1x1 W+1
1 on the L to hit=+2+2 from the W's= +{4} profit.
So doing it My way it would be wwL=+4 because you won the 3 bets.(nolinks) Your way
nolinksL=+2 because you won 3 out of 4 bets.(wwLw) your way
nolinkswL=Even because you won 3 out of 5 bets (wwLLw) your way.
So the problem would Come for you in these next examples.
ww (nolinks) My way<< you won the 1st 2 bets & lost the next 3 (wwLLL) your way
So it would look like this My way with the Lw notations as I do.
w-1x1=+1
w-1x1=+2
w-bet 1 lose +1
w-bet 1 lose Even
w-bet 1 lose –1
It would look like this doing it Your way Mate ww(LLL)
So the wLw Lw Lw Lw LwLwL pattern would really Kill you (My way)
Because the W would be the trigger for you to start betting and the L would lose on You....so In fact You would be losing 1x1 each time You bet on the Ls because Your betting for the L to be a W for You.
Your Friend .
Lanky.
Ps We have a group of a few people called
"For a Good Cause"
We are searching for the Consistent Bet so we too can support Charity from the Winnings.
Hi Ryan
could you verify win3millions page 19 for us
regards
Werdna
ryan im not impresed one bit
I just want to clarify something:
Ryan08 is NOT RyanBuff.
I don't know why Charles mentioned him, because Ryan08 has nothing to with all this.
With that said, and considering the silly mind-game that this is becoming, and the strange time-wasting acts of certain individuals, I am not going to make any more public posts regarding CEH-related topics.
All the best to everyone still wanting to discuss this.
Your friend, :)
Marven
im with marven this this is gotten out of contoll all the best TINO ps this is all begin to sound like the enymista saga where 2 italian guys started a rumor and snowball from there mr ryan buff if this is all true be a man and come forward with it.
Is this it:
Once you get two differing dozens, you bet on both of them. If you get a sleeping dozen for four spins, you bet on it.
Sam
Hi RyanBuff
Here is a sample of spin results from a live casino.
Dozen
A,A,B,B,C,C,B,C,C,C,C,C,C,B,B,B,C,A,A,C,C,A,B,B
|
How would you bet on the above sequence of dozens?
Cheers
If this claim would be true. Sorry if I'm a sceptic, I want to believe. It would also work with randomly generated numbers.
I'm going to bed now... This post will be 30+ pages tomorrow
Ryanbluff, In your original post why did you not bet for a change (C) on 13 because you had 4 decisions in the previous column
[smiley=3D-Smil/28_1_16.gif]
Dennisbelle,
Yes, bet the change there (@13).
See posts 12 & 24.
RP
Quote from: RyanBuff on February 17, 2009, 08:11:48 PMexample-a,b,c,b,b,c,a,b,a,a,c,c,a,c,b Notice this would be all wins=+11 once that c hit, we trapped c and b then since there would be four numbers (c,b,b,c) we would then bet and trap a until it hits or we go down three units (if we go down 3 units, we just wait for a and another dozen to hit again) I will keep giving you examples if it's helping. Keep up the good work.
[table=,]
1,,2,,3,,4,,5,
a,,c,,a,+2,c,+2,b,+2,
b,,b,,b,,c,,
,,b,+1,a,+1,a,+1,,
,,c,+1,a,+1,c,+1,[/table]
Hi Ryan,
Is this how the bets would be won? This comes to +12 so I must be doing something wrong?
Lonhro,
I'm not answering for Ryan, but just repling with my 2 cents as I begin to understand this system.
1 2 3 4 5
a c a +2 c +2 b +2
b b b c
b +1 a +1 a +1
c +1 a +1 c +1
In column 4, there would not be a bet in the third position (it's bold and blue) because only one group (c) has been established thus far, I think.
After the (a) appears, the next bet is correct in position #4 -
and then the change/switch to the top of column 5. RP
6
Your point is well taken. Everyone has an opportunity and is welcome to express their opinion as you have.
Sam
Quote from: RoulettePlayer on February 18, 2009, 01:14:06 AM
Lonhro,
I'm not answering for Ryan, but just repling with my 2 cents as I begin to understand this system.
1 2 3 4 5
a c a +2 c +2 b +2
b b b c
b +1 a +1 a +1
c +1 a +1 c +1
In column 4, there would not be a bet in the third position (it's bold and blue) because only one group (c) has been established thus far, I think.
After the (a) appears, the next bet is correct in position #4 -
and then the change/switch to the top of column 5. RP
Thanks RP, knew it would be simple!
Quote from: Number Six on February 18, 2009, 02:01:09 AM
Why have you set us this bizarre riddle of finding bets within bets?
So you didn't actually read anything? You wrote that whole long post without reading things through.
Going to put that chart in proper format.
[table=,]
1,,,,,2,,,,,3,,,,,4,,,,,5
a,,,,,c,,,,,a +2,,,,,c +2,,,,,b +2
b,,,,,b,,,,,b,,,,,c
,,,,,b +1,,,,,a +1,,,,,A +1
,,,,,c +1,,,,,a +1,,,,,c +1
[/table]
In column 4, there would not be a bet in the third position (it's Captial A +1) because only one group (c) has been established thus far, I think.
After the (A) appears, the next bet is correct in position #4 -
and then the change/switch to the top of column 5. RP
Sam
Here we go again. That other post is the better part of 100 pages and still there's no firm agreement on what the bet is. At least Ryan Buff has come back to answer questions which is good. Just hope something a bit more solid comes of it.
How does one "trap" a bet though? I'm with the darksiders so far on this one, regardless of past results the next bet has a 1 in x% chance of winning. And $5million won in a year? That isn't much in the high rollers room. 200 units @ $25000/unit. But I'm all for enlightenment....and surprises :)
Quote from: Philc on February 18, 2009, 11:28:01 AM
Why is anyone listening to this IDIOT!!
On top of all the lies he is now a giving away crap systems on Youtube.
Lets find the winning bet and give some money to this "Child in Need" (of a brain).
I would like to know how a winner can come up with crap systems.
Pls send me the link on youtube
Number Six
Like others, I entertain the idea this fellow is just looking to make a bunch of people work very hard and if one should find a winning bet, he gets it. That might be the last we ever hear of him; might not be. And again, this fellow may just be lonely and enjoy the attention he's getting.
Flip the coin and he could be telling the truth. He wants to see someone work hard enough to learn the bet and they will appreciate what he gives them enough to give to charity. "You got to prime the pump; got to have faith and believe. You got to give of yourself before you're ready to receive." Desert Pete
Philc
He forgot to say that if you lost that first bet, you're out 17 smackeroos and will have to scratch your way back to zero by winning 17 times in a row. There is a craps bet just like this. They work until they loose and then you don't get breakfast!
Sam
Charles/Ryan
...or whoever you are, I don't care...
You have some really bad mental problems mate, make yourself a favor and go to a hospital.
/m
Ryan
There are some very intelligent people here that cannot be fooled by suckers
like you trying to get others to find a winning bet for you!
Then what would you do. Package it up and sell it?
ok, there is always room for freedom of speech in my book. If someone was to show the world the holy grail that never lost and always won, there would still be a few who would question the motives, question the system and question the man,( I AM NOT STATING THIS TOPIC TO BE ANYTHING MORE THAN FOOD FOR THOUGHT JUST NOW) Now i'm staying out of this discussion as it is rapidly becoming a slanging match. I would rather look at the information given and see if i can use it or turn it into something i can use. If it comes to nothing at least it was tried and avenues explored.
If there are those who want to comment negatively , fine. Just do it in an adult manner and if you can, back your argument up with logic or least your point of view.
If this is too much effort then take the insults to the pit, that is it's purpose. The purpose of this forum is to share and discuss.
Certain comments/ threads/ individuals are in danger of gradually turning this forum into another GG.
Personally I think some of you guys are WAY out of line with your comments. There have been much worse bets posted on these boards and people have politely told the OP that the bet will fail in the long run and moved on. Why should this thread be any different? Because of timing? Because of win3million's references to this individual? Some of you are completely outrageous with your comments. I understand if you disagree, but there is a way to disagree and keep your dignity. But calling a person unspeakables and telling them to go kill or hospitalize themselves is way out of line for the likes of this board. You guys are much better than this regardless of who you are speaking about. This is VLS not GG or the recent likes of win3million.
Davey-Jones,
Regarding my post about the hospitalization...
Personally, I don't think this system is worse than any other here. I thanked the author for the system.
I'm just tired of some people's lies and childish games. They involve us, members of this board in their fights, which is completely unnecessary.
Thank you.
/m
I thought this would happen. Did anyone save his posts he deleted? I'd like to look more at it... :/
Quote from: alarian on February 18, 2009, 08:30:20 PM
I thought this would happen. Did anyone save his posts he deleted? I'd like to look more at it... :/
Check your PM inbox. Sent.
Naa... But thanks anyway! :thumbsup:
I checked the first post he made and it wasn't exactly worth anything
Hi,
Could anyone repost ryans bet plz.
Kind regards.
Skrizy, here it is:
The BET:
Step 1: code the table into ANY three sections using A,B,C (use dozens when first learning)
Step 2: record and trap the results. Have there be two dozens in a column like this:
Example: Example 2= +6 UNITS
A B A C B C B 1.A 4.C 9.A 13.C 15.A 21.B
A B B A A C C 2.B 5.B 10.A 14.B 16.C
C C A A C C 3.B 6.C 11.B 17.A
A B B A 7.C 12.A 18.A
A B 8.B 19.C
20.C
Here are all the bets for example 2
Spin 6 is your first bet. Bet on C and B=+1
Spin 7 bet c and b=+1, now that there's four spins in this column, you start betting on the change (A)
Spin 8 bet A=-1
Spin 9 bet A=+2
Spin 12 bet a and b=+1
Spin 15 bet c and b=-2
Spin 17 bet a and c=+1
Spin 18 bet a and c=+1
Spin 19 bet b=-1
Spin 20 bet b=-1
Spin 21 bet b=+2, please note that if b didn't hit this time then we would stop betting on it
Step 3: make sure to trap the change by starting a new column like above
How to play this: After much research, the best way to play this is to trap the runs into four spins and then start betting on the change for up to three spins or until it comes, whichever comes first (3 losses or a win)
Step 4: notice this is a formula, to make this bet faster you could use columns and dozens at the same time and in fact split the table into ANY three ways so you would have atleast a bet every spin and just bet on one of your choices.
Regards,
Marven
Hello Guys,
Ryan's bet looks like 2 years old from the last post.
I just saw this today.
Can someone advise if it is profitable and/or if anyone has been doing testing on this system for the past 2 years?
Thank you
Jose
I hate to admit it but I don't understand this "explanation" at all. :blink:
Could anyone please put me onto the right track?
Cheers
Hans