Dozens bet selection

[MattyMattz]

After seeing how chipper and feisty you are today,
I'm starting to believe you dropped out of the
contest because you were hopelessly behind.

No, wait, I believed that already. In fact I predicted
it in a PM to Bombus.

Never mind.

I gotta say it's seems like a legitimate guess to me.

[crackers]

I gotta say it's seems like a legitimate guess to me.

please explain to everyone why I might have experienced stress and then was relieved
once I stopped the competition. Believe it or not I have nothing to prove. If I have shared
voodoo bull crap then you are protected by your own intellect. If you are pulling any
wool over your own eyes then that is totaly on you. Your opinion of why I quit does not
validate any suspicions of true human nature. Its just you. It's  not a fact. But I don't
have to give a hoot. If you want to believe what you do then live with the consequences. You must own it. It's totaly on you. All you're doing is motivating me to validate the opportunities and weaknesses  of randomness regardless of the personalities invested in it, pro or con.

[cheese]

Believe it or not I have nothing to prove.

Yes, we see that every time there's a competition. You
have nothing. Does this mean no more stressful contests
for you? Being on the endangered list and all..

[MattyMattz]

please explain to everyone why I might have experienced stress and then was relieved
once I stopped the competition. Believe it or not I have nothing to prove. If I have shared
voodoo bull crap then you are protected by your own intellect. If you are pulling any
wool over your own eyes then that is totaly on you. Your opinion of why I quit does not
validate any suspicions of true human nature. Its just you. It's  not a fact. But I don't
have to give a hoot. If you want to believe what you do then live with the consequences. You must own it. It's totaly on you. All you're doing is motivating me to validate the opportunities and weaknesses  of randomness regardless of the personalities invested in it, pro or con.

I have no idea what your talking about... all I said was I can see why someone would think that.  You drop out of the competition stating the stress is killing you but have more than enough time to banter back and forth with him in a stressful manner... Heck maybe you don't find the banter stressful, that makes sense too. 

I'm not looking for you or anyone to prove anything.  Go out and win your millions, I could care less.  I'm just here to have some fun and chat with some long lost friends. 

MM

[crackers]

This does not make me wake up at 4:30am the competition did. Spike only sees an
excuse. Take notice of this. You are not talking about reading randomness as an
absence of trends. WHY IS THAT HAPPENING?

Did the thing that cheese sharered go right over your head? If you don't know then it did. You really owe it to yourself to know.

[crackers]

I have an idea. Don't look at this. I'm a bullshit artist. I did all this for five
years to get cheese to give it up.

[Carpanta]

This does not make me wake up at 4:30am the competition did.

What was so much disturbing about the competition that it got you so anxious?


Why such eagerness to place a bet when you could put up one once every four days (go see the rules) instead of playing your alarm clock conditions?

You (like me also) had been lingering around here for a long time . Now it seems you are running out of time (for the contest).

For the record: im not annoyed with you, just a little bit disappointed with your attitude leading yourself to step down from the challenge.

Cheers,
Carlos.

[cheese]

What was so much disturbing about the competition that it got you so anxious?

He plays in the casino for real money all the
time and feels no stress at all. Yet a couple
bets on a forum for no money sends him to
the emergency room.

Think about it. Pretend you're Columbo and
connect the dots.

[mcmonaco]

Here you playing not even for peanuts
ang geting excited,let alone playing in
live casino with real money.What a great
players on paper you guys are.
Lot of bla-bla all these years and you
still here....be better of going to casino
every night instead.....but I doubt that most
of you ever been there at all.Sad but tru.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Spike only sees an
excuse. Take notice of this. You are not talking about reading randomness as an
absence of trends. WHY IS THAT HAPPENING?

Did the thing that cheese sharered go right over your head? If you don't know then it did. You really owe it to yourself to know.

Not sure what you mean here, please clarify?  It now makes sense that with random, trends can no more be relied upon than the anti-trend.  The anti-trend or unbalance is what roulette produces on a consistent basis.

[crackers]

" What was so much disturbing about the competition that it got you so anxious?"

I wanted a good example of my methods demonstrated. It takes at least one or
two really good trends per every 150 spins in order to reach success. That's what
I do when I go to a casino. All this takes place in or around five hours. If I reach
my goal in less spins it's over sooner. That means that any stress is done in a few
hours. Maybe the concept of keeping it all going day after day is too difficult to
understand or believe. You know those math oriented players that think that trends
don't exist. That every spin is an independent occurrence. That past occurrences have
no effect on future spins. These people have nothing in their heads that stays there
more than a minute. I can't expect them to understand complex strategic tactics.

[crackers]

Not sure what you mean here, please clarify?  It now makes sense that with random, trends can no more be relied upon than the anti-trend.  The anti-trend or unbalance is what roulette produces on a consistent basis.

Everything coming from the wheel is almost perfect randomness, if you ignore any
possible DS, bias, or physics tracking. When a real bias does exist it only has a less
than 6% deviation from true randomness. That's six spins hitting in five slot wide
section of the wheel in one hundred spins. The anti-trend occurs 70% of the time.
Perhaps even greater than that. It doesn't serve to balance things if you know how
to live with it. According to Spike, he thrives on it. I ignored it by moving on to other
available trends. Spike claims  a 72%

[crackers]

Spike claimed an average 72% hit rate on EC's. I've made the decision to try  the
sections in my charts that I have ignored for the past five years. How could I
possibly be expected to give an assessment of its value in just one day. I know
this much though. On EC's it's 50 / 50 on average. There's not much equalization
going on there with regards to any opportunities used from trends. I hope that
made sense.

[Robeenhuut]

Everything coming from the wheel is almost perfect randomness, if you ignore any
possible DS, bias, or physics tracking. When a real bias does exist it only has a less
than 6% deviation from true randomness. That's six spins hitting in five slot wide
section of the wheel in one hundred spins. The anti-trend occurs 70% of the time.
Perhaps even greater than that. It doesn't serve to balance things if you know how
to live with it. According to Spike, he thrives on it. I ignored it by moving on to other
available trends. Spike claims  a 72%

Relax. Nobody really cares about this challenge. It only provides some entertainment 4 masses and it will be forgotten soon. Whoever wins will be a king of a jungle 4 a day and no more.
Just treat it as a vanity competition because basically what it is.  Would i want a winner 2 be my guru?  Not  necessarily because a setup here is still sort of random.
It reminds me of picking stocks competition when a monkey was a winner coz everybody can win short term. 

Regards

[crackers]

I am more relaxed. I'm just dealing with the fallout caused by quitting. My goal was
to put more focused attention on using trends and giving examples of trend's differing
types of characteristics. It's been about two months and I've succeed in that effort.
I even got a bonus for all this trouble. Spike gave up a huge clue and failed miserably
with his predictions in doing it. I never claimed anything he said I would end up
claiming. There's nothing to get stressed about. Perhaps I'm capable of a better
average than 72%. After all. Spike is not that all very bright.

[crackers]

-