Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

6 point divisor on Even Chances instead of two Dozens

Started by mikeyboy, November 21, 2008, 01:39:34 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mikeyboy

What are peoples favourite methods of playing the even chances with the six point divisor ?

I have been experimenting with the last dozens but it isn't very secure in my opinion...

Betting even chances (1 unit bet covers 50%)
Betting two dozens (2 units cover 66%)


Thats 100% more betting units to cover just 16% more of the table, this just doesn't sound right!

Anybody care to share their ideas?

I have made a bot and i will release it if/when i can have it making steady money using a system based on ANY or all of the even chance bets and the six point divisor, so please if anyone has any suggestions post them!  ;)

Boo_Ray

Quote from: mikeyboy on November 21, 2008, 01:39:34 PM
Betting even chances (1 unit bet covers 50%)
Betting two dozens (2 units cover 66%)


1unit doesn't covers 50% !

mikeyboy

It does if you play no zero roulette...  :)

Is this what you meant? Any suggestions?

Boo_Ray

yes that is what i mean..
but i havent seen real no zero roulette

mikeyboy


VLSroulette

QuoteBetting even chances (1 unit bet covers 50%)
Betting two dozens (2 units cover 66%)

Thats 100% more betting units to cover just 16% more of the table, this just doesn't sound right!


I think the main goal of betting 2 dozens is to have lesser dispersion of hits. In this sense one just can't complain about the 2 required units.

The layout's even chances locations are there to serve the hardcore math-oriented person who doesn't care about roulette as a device and only focuses in probability. 18 numbers are 18 numbers, no matter how you pick them, so 1 unit covering them is fair. 24 numbers can't be covered by 1 single unit as there isn't any location making it (i've always thought there should be a bet for covering dozens 1-2 and 2-3 with 1 unit, as much as columns too), so having to add the extra unit is, well, in some people's eyes a good deal too. Covering 24 numbers using 2 units is a good deal too! You've got a point there mike, but unless we have that. Anyway, there are good MM plans for 2 dozens :) Perhaphs you can code some with your bot [smiley=thumbsup.gif], how about the 6-point plan or my leftmost cancellation?

TwoCatSam

Hello

That 50%/66% gives me something to think about.  I really doesn't seem right!

Sam

Worm

Yes its interesting thoughts indeed. :)

roules

Not in a matter of 5 hours. Give folks some time to think it over or at least come across it first  ;)

The first thing that comes to mind is you would need flexibility on how much you can bet on the E/Cs. ie the units need to be broken down to fit the 6point divisors calculations. This may seem obvious but unlike dozens you can't spread the bet across two places. Does that make any sense? I'm no guru on the 6Pt plan so maybe not lol

Roules

roules

Quote from: Boo_Ray on November 21, 2008, 06:13:14 PM
Quote from: mikeyboy on November 21, 2008, 01:39:34 PM
Betting even chances (1 unit bet covers 50%)
Betting two dozens (2 units cover 66%)


1unit doesn't covers 50% !

In this context this usually means it's close enough to 50% - a zero is counted as a loss as is the opposite colour bet.
Of course 2 units doesn't cover 66% for that matter either.

mikeyboy

I play on a no zero genuine RNG roulette casino, so the 50% and 66% (66.6% recurring if you want to be pedantic  ;)) are correct

roules: not really getting you... ? "the units need to be broken down to fit the 6point divisors calculations" .... Hmmm....  ???

I'm currently experimenting with betting 1 unit after 3 EC's, if that loses then bet 1 unit again, if that loses then bet 2 units.
So the progression is 1,1,2 (2nd and 3rd bet we break even, no point chasing it to lose more)

All losses are added to a 6 point divisor of which the divisor goes up after every two losses but if we lose on the third attempt of the progression we add 1 anyway...

Will keep fiddling  ;)

roules

Quoteroules: not really getting you... ? "the units need to be broken down to fit the 6point divisors calculations" .... Hmmm....  Huh?

Yeah I struggled to convey what I wanted to say there. What I meant was can you break down the units easily or are you stuck with whole dollars? Wouldn't matter too much anyway as you could just round up/down.
I'm assuming you're playing at betfair for the no zero wheel - gotta love that blue and white layout!

Lanky says his divisor plan works on e/cs as well.

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/6-point-divisor-plan/msg267/#msg267

lucky_strike


Hi mikeyboy.

I like even money and i think the 6 PDP would work great.
I just want to say, no matter what staking plan you use, always start with 3 flat bets.

111

+0-

You see when you have a selection, then W and LW will chop above LLW and when you hit LLL thats easy to recoup, a 3 unit loss.

So i am saying, no matter what staking plan you use, always start every attack with 3 flat bets.

Cheers LS

mikeyboy

Quote from: lucky strike on November 27, 2008, 11:03:12 AM

Hi mikeyboy.

I like even money and I think the 6 PDP would work great.
I just want to say, no matter what staking plan you use, always start with 3 flat bets.

111

+0-


You see when you have a selection, then W and LW will chop above LLW and when you hit LLL thats easy to recoup, a 3 unit loss.

So I am saying, no matter what staking plan you use, always start every attack with 3 flat bets.

Interesting idea, thanks Lucky Strike, i will do some testing, done two tests with 1,1,2 - both have made me 60+ units (the goal, 10 games of 6/6=1) within 1100 spins, max drawdown was 170 units but recovered well, the other only had a max drawdown of 80 units... will keep testing :)

JHM

Quote from: TwoCatSam on November 25, 2008, 12:22:00 AM
Hello

That 50%/66% gives me something to think about.  I really doesn't seem right!

Sam

It does Sam.

Check this

2 dozen vs. 1 ec. = 64,68% vs. 48,65% (European roulette). So for 16,03 more change of hitting risk 50% more bet. Seems unfair agreed.

Than

1 dozen vs. 1 ec. = 32,43% vs. 48,65% (European roulette). So for 16,22 less change of hitting earn 100% more. Sounds like the ec. is unfair compared to 1 dozen bet?

Etc. etc.

It's the math of the game. The more risk taken on the bet the bigger the win. The les the risk the smaller the win.



JHM

-