Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

How To Beat Roulette

Started by Spike, May 14, 2008, 10:48:21 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gizmotron

Quote from: warman
Hey Giz

Nothing works my friend I have the only system that works.Live with it. I just got back from A.C. I will sleep a bit then post more.Thinks for the spelling lesson I been driving for 3 hours. And for the part that you said that you post things that's what a forum does also. People here check out my system in the test zone right here it's my proof that I have the only system in the world that really works to beat all the table games.Also flat betting only .

winwithmath

James Albert Wendel

Yeah, right. It must be really nice there in your own little world. Show me one person that understands your "only system" and that has learned from you on this forum. Let that person come forward and explain it in the simplest of terms, please. You have the floor. The spotlight is on, the microphone is hot, the audience is ready. Let the masses be shown the light of day.


GARNabby

Quote from: Mr J on October 13, 2009, 05:30:47 PMThis current way, I am betting on 2 numbers that have not hit in a LONG time but are NOT the 2 furthest back.

(From the thread, nolinks://vlsroulette.com/gambling-and-roulette-related/playing-over-the-weekend-did-great!/ .)



Ken,

This is the symbolic, rather than simplistic, approach-example I game to Giz in the thread nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/how-to-beat-roulette/ .

Unlike baccarat's binary P-B choices, roulette offers the (inside) numbers; but roulette affords no card-information, by counting or randomization of.  Therefore, the type of randomness of roulette is more subtle; less about alternating sequences continuing(alternately), or about long streaks ending, or short ones beginning (, in the finite long-run, of course).  This, of course then, leaves us with the irregular zig-zag outcomes, which streak but don't streak... hence which should then end but not end, as by the "strategy" above.

Until some (real) applied physics models of randomness has been developed to account for how the past outcomes are being transformed into the future ones,  perhaps impossible with only those numerical outcomes, such a "strategy" may be a very-good stepping-off point.

Wrt Giz's request for specifics, I have some from the baccarat-vantage at nolinks://projectbaccarat.proboards.com/index.cgi .  (Interested persons may register first to be signed in later.)

GARNabby

-