Small series contra larger series for Tangram

[lucky_strike]

This is just one method among many you can use.
This one is based upon the law or series and the law of correction.

This one is about small series contra larger series.

To find a qualified signal it has to appear with at least 16 outcomes, that's rule number one.
It has to appear within 50 outcomes, that's rule number two.

You don´t calculate the singels you calculate the series of 2 contra larger series into the window you find.

When you hit a statistical ecart of 3.00 or above you can start to play after the first serie of 3 appears.


20070103

 B
 B
R
R
 B
 B
 B
 B
R
 B
R
 B
R
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
R
 B
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
 B
R
 B
R
R
 B
 B
R
 B
 B
R
R
R
R
 B
R
 B
 B
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
R
R -------------- 14/2 a statistical ecart of 3.00
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6
 B
 B
 B ------------ a serie of 3
R
 B
R
 B
R
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6


20070102

 B
 B
R
R
 B
R
R
 B
R
 B
R
 B
R
R
 B
R
R
 B
 B
R
 B
 B
R
R
R
R
R
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
R
R
 B
R
 B
R
 B
R
R
 B
R
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
R
 B
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
 B
R
R ------------- 17/1 a statistical ecart above 3.00
R
R
R ------------- a serie of 5
 B
R
 B
 B
R
R
 B
R
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6


Cheers LS

[Tangram]

LS,

Thanks for posting your example. I need some further explanation before I can understand it though.

R -------------- 14/2 a statistical ecart of 3.00
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6
  B
  B
  B ------------ a serie of 3
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6

In this sequence, do you start betting immediately after "a serie of 3"? what are you betting on? I can't figure it out from the W/L sequence.

[xman1970]

Very Interesting LS 

Pls keep em coming & I will try and understand it....


many thanks Guys....

BTW, is this something you only use for even bets???

[lucky_strike]

Hi and thanks for your kind replys, here is some more ex...

20080718

R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
  B
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
  B ----------- 15/2 a statistical ecart above 3.00
  B ----------- a serie 3
R
  B
  B
  B
  B  ---------- a serie of 4
R
  B
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
R
  B
  B
  B
  B ----------- a serie of 4
R
  B
  B
R
R
R
R ------------- a serie of 4

20080719

R
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
  B
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
R  ------------- 16/2 a statistical ecart above 3.00
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 7
  B
  B
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 4

Cheers LS

[Tangram]

LS,

You said:

When you hit a statistical ecart of 3.00 or above you can start to play after the first serie of 3 appears.

That much I understand, but in this sequence:

R -------------- 14/2 a statistical ecart of 3.00
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6
  B
  B
  B ------------ a serie of 3     - so we start betting here, but on what? and for how long?
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6

[lucky_strike]

There is a march for 3 intervals to get an hit, I maybe tell you more about that later.

R
R -------------- 14/2 a statistical ecart of 3.00
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6
  B
  B
  B ------------ a serie of 3
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6
 
R
R ------------- 17/1 a statistical ecart above 3.00
R
R
R ------------- a serie of 5
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 6

  B
  B ----------- 15/2 a statistical ecart above 3.00
  B ----------- a serie 3
R
  B
  B
  B ---------- a serie of 4
  B
R
  B
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
R
  B
  B
  B
  B ----------- a serie of 4
R
  B
  B
R
R
R
R ------------- a serie of 4

R
R  ------------- 16/2 a statistical ecart above 3.00
R
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 7
  B
  B
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
R
R -------------- a serie of 4

[lucky_strike]

20080717

  B
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
R
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
  B
R
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
  B ----------- 14/2 a statistical ecart 3.00
  B
  B ----------- a serie 4
R
  B
  B
R
R
  B
  B
R
  B
R
R
  B
R
R
R
R
R  -------------- a serie 5

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

Tangram now you know how to find series of 4 or above.

Just want to add that some times the series can come like this 33438.

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

Here you have a chart for the statistical ecart. At the top you have the underrepresented figure, event.
At the left side do you have the overrepresented figure, event.


This is how you caculate...

Now the first thing is to get the difference between this events, the absolute ecart:

14 - 2 = 12

Now we whant to get the statistical ecart so we add

14 + 2 = 16

Now we take the sqr of 16 = 4

And finally we divide the absolute ecart whit the sqr

12 sqr 4 = 3,00

The Statistical Ecart 3,00

Cheers LS

[Tangram]

LS.

Thanks for the info, but I still don't know where you actually place your bets when you have a trigger, I already know how to measure the deviation.

Does anyone else not get this or is it just me? 

What is the bet selection when the trigger shows up?

Tangram now you know how to find series of 4 or above.

Why do I need to know that? you said in your first post that you bet after a series of 3

You said in an earlier post that not many have shown an interest in your method, well it's not surprising because they probably don't know how it works...

[Tangram]

Ok, as far as I can see you bet FTL after the first series of 3 following a deviation of 3+

It's not clear how many bets you make though, in your examples it shows only one bet per signal. What is the stop loss and stop win?

Cheers.

[Tangram]

LS,

Since you haven't bothered to confirm the bet selection, or answer my other questions, I assume you don't want anyone to know the details of your system, but if that's the case, why bother to start the thread in the first place? You're just wasting my time and yours.

I've noticed the same pattern again and again in forums over the years. Anyone who claims a winning method never shows in explicit detail the mechanics of how it actually works, because if they did it would be shown to be a loser. It's almost as though people would rather remain deluded, they get attached to their pet theories and couldn't bear it if they are shown to be fallacies (especially if they've put a lot of time and energy into them), this is just human nature, and it's not going to change.

[lucky_strike]

because if they did it would be shown to be a loser

Okay I don´t want to brag but if you want to know, then the 5 session I show you made 54 units flat betting.
540$ using 10$ chips 5400$ using 100$ chips...

Tangram.
Now you are polite, I like that, so if you want we can move this part of the dialog to a private place.

Now if you read my first post at random section, I told you that I would show you how to find series of 4 or above.
I did not tell you that I would give you a complete strategy to rob the casinos with.

Tangram.
Every system or strategy that exist will fail. That is not a secret.
The only way to beat the game is to know how to win more and break even more then you hit your loss limit. That should not be a secret.

Tangram.
To get result like this flat betting is hard work.
+14
+3
+14
+3
+14
+3
+14
+14
+3
+14
+14

There is many different ways, lets assume you only would use the one above then you would get 11 QS in 20 000 outcomes.

The thing I don´t like is that many members want things served on a silver plate, get some one else hard work for free with out studying it by them self.

So what is the conclusion here... I tell you... you give me 20 QS and I give you the march with intervals to hit the correction.

Then you can find out the truth by your self and see if you can make it work or if you think its crap and based upon a fallacy.

And remember I did not tell you that I was going to give you the holy grail, but I can tell you that you want find a strategy on internet that beat this one, so if you show me some real intresst to this, we can work as a team and get some large sampels of statistics regarding this one.

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

You can use TRNGs because if you beat them you will beat any-thing regarding 1/2.

You find a sticky post at baccarat section TRNGs and a Program to use them with.

Cheers LS

[Tangram]

LS,

I assumed from your comments in the random section that you would be giving full details, because you said it's up to me to prove that the system fails. However, it seems I misunderstood - no harm done.

we can move this part of the dialog to a private place.

Is there a PM facility on the forum? I didn't realise.

you would get 11 QS in 20 000 outcomes.

So I assume you must be using multiple bet selections which give you more opportunities, otherwise this method is hardly practical is it?

The thing I don´t like is that many members want things served on a silver plate, get some one else hard work for free with out studying it by them self.

Ok, fair enough.

you give me 20 QS and I give you the march with intervals to hit the correction.

And if I do that you will fully explain the method so I can do my own testing?

What irritates me is when people give "hints". Not because I'm lazy and want it given to me on a silver plate, but because there are a huge number of possibilities to choose from. The number of combinations and permutations of systems are endless. (the truth is, all these apparently different approaches amount to the same thing, but no-one want to hears that.). A hint is only useful if there are a limited number of possibilities and some are more logical than others. But, since every system is based on faulty logic, it follows that any arbitrary set of rules is as "valid" as any other, so the only thing you can do is keep trying different approaches. It's really like trying to "prove" that 2 + 2 = 5 -  a fruitless exercise.

However, I would like to understand your system so that I can give it a fair trial.

[Tangram]

-