Small series contra larger series for Tangram

[Tangram]

LS,

I will use numbers from random.org and send you the QS in batches, are you ok with that?

[Tangram]

was it something I said?   

[TwoCatSam]

"It's almost as though people would rather remain deluded, they get attached to their pet theories and couldn't bear it if they are shown to be fallacies (especially if they've put a lot of time and energy into them), this is just human nature, and it's not going to change."

To me, in my lil' ol' opinion, this is one of the greatest truths I've ever read on a roulette forum.  I once read a book, POSITIVE ILLUSIONS, because of a person I knew who was constantly under some illusion or another and I found that I was under illusions---we all are!  And, like Tangram says, we'll thank you to keep the truth away from our illusions.

THIS WAS A GENERAL STATEMENT AND NOT DIRECTED TO WILDCARD OR ANY ANYONE ELSE.

Samster

[Wildcard]

Hi Sam, i really enjoy reading your posts and thank you for mentioning me 

However, i´m a little confused here, - sorry - can you please elucidate me ? I know it was a general statement and you didn´t mean to direct it to me, but ... are implying that i might be living an illusion and would rather remain deluded ?

If that´s the case, i have to tell you that i have a hard time recognizing how mistaken i can be over something, but once i "digest" it, i am very pleased someone showed me just that... Makes me (if nothing else), a little smarter and a little humbler.

Sometimes we need to be reminded of how "small" we can be   

Cheers, amigo !!

[TwoCatSam]

Wildcard

No, I was not speaking of you specifically but of humans in general.  I have a little book called YOUR OWNER'S MANUAL.  It is a good read for a rainy afternoon.  The author says when we believe something, we unconsciously seek evidence to prove our belief while at the same time ignoring evidence to the contrary.  Since this is an unconscious activity, we don't even know we're doing it.

From my own experience, when something seems to be going far too well, I recheck my figures and find I've left out a bunch of losers.  Then reality sets in.  And the truth is my mind overlooked those losers to support my belief! 

A bit of TwoCat philosophy........

When one develops a system he should want someone to do their best to tear it down and prove it doesn't work.  If the person does just that, we save money.  If the person can't tear it down, we all make money.

Have a prosperous day!

Samster

[Tangram]

When one develops a system he should want someone to do their best to tear it down and prove it doesn't work.

That's a great attitude Sam, it's a shame more people don't share it.

@ LS,

I take it that you've changed your mind about giving the details, no problem. Good luck with it anyway.

[Carpanta]

When one develops a system he should want someone to do their best to tear it down and prove it doesn't work.

That's a great attitude Sam, it's a shame more people don't share it.

@ LS,

I take it that you've changed your mind about giving the details, no problem. Good luck with it anyway.

Hi Tangram,

If you have the time, the patience, the guts and many more good attitudes, study Marigny the Grilleau and youll have complete response to all questions you adressed Lucky Strike.

Best regards,
Carlos.

[Tangram]

Hi Carlos,

Thanks for the tip, but I investigated Marigny's methods a long time ago, plus variations, and found that they didn't work.
I'm not going to put any time or effort into researching these methods any more, they are based on the gambler's fallacy. If someone claims they have a winning system based on GF, I will challenge them, but I'm not going to waste any more time chasing highways to no-where.

No offense intended, these are my opinions and in no way reflect those of the management! 

[Carpanta]

Hi Tangram,

If that's your position about Marigny no purpose to follow Lucky'thread cos it is based on his theories.

Regards,
Carlos.

[lucky_strike]

Thats correct Carpanta.

CPM is based upon that.

Cheers LS

[Tangram]

@ LS,

I was just going to respond to your post and now I see you have removed it. Are you going to give me the details if I send you the QS's,  or not?

[lucky_strike]

Well Tangram you say above that you know Marigny and thats the basics i wanted to show you, to start with, so know there is no need to do that, is there.

And if you know then you alredy know how to procide after a SE 3.0 or 3,5...

Cheers LS

[Tangram]

LS,

I haven't read Grilleau's books, the only information I got was from win-maxx. They say -

Grilleau recommends to start an attack against appearances of single chances ( i.e. Isolated spins against Series, or Series of 2 against higher Series etc.) after the Estat has reached a value of 3 or more.

Which is basically the same method you use to find the QS. However, there's no guide as to what to do when you find the QS. I tried various approaches but nothing worked, maybe you have a variation which does?

As I said, I don't mind if you don't want to share, it's not a problem.

[lucky_strike]

I haven't read Grilleau's books, the only information I got was from win-maxx.

Yes exactly and they havent try it because they don´t know how to.

It has been very difficult for me to understand the basics because it turns you around to see things that you never tought would work.

Tangram CPM is a hudge thing to understand and it gets more complicated to read about the new work based upon Marginys original.

Well I keep my word, I always do, so you send me the QS and I will start to introduce you to this world.

Cheers LS

[Tangram]

Well I keep my word, I always do, so you send me the QS and I will start to introduce you to this world.

Ok, thanks. I'll send some in the next day or so.

I suppose all Grilleau's works are written in French? there's very little about him on the net in English.

[Tangram]

-