Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Small series contra larger series for Tangram

Started by lucky_strike, July 18, 2008, 04:32:07 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

lucky_strike


Tangram i change my mind i will post this at system section, so there is no need to give me QS.

Then after i post it every one can try it for them self as it is or make it there own way.

It will take some time because i will track 2.5 - 3.0 and the 3.5 that Marigny use.

Cheers LS

TwoCatSam

Hey, LS, thanks in advance.

You know this roulette is like a jigsaw puzzle with the pieces in fifty countries.  I am totally convinced it CAN be put together!

(And if I die and don't do it, well, I had fun!!)

TwoCat

Tangram


lucky_strike

Well I just made a short run using 3.30 or above for 20 000 TRNGs.

Won 181 units flat betting. 15 sessions. BR 90 units.

I lilke that 8 won sessions and you operating with casino money.

If we add the other 5 sessions to this we would have won 235 units.

Statistical Ecart 3.32
Window 38
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.32
Window 35
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.32
Window 32
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.46
Window 34
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.61
Window 36
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.74
Window 44
Result +4

Statistical Ecart 3.46
Window 40
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.61
Window 45
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.46
Window 42
Result +4

Statistical Ecart 3.35
Window 45
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.80
Window 40
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.50
Window 50
Result +11

Statistical Ecart 3.50
Window 50
Result +11

Statistical Ecart 3.32
Window 47
Result +14

Statistical Ecart 3.60
Window 48
Result +11

Maybe I should make it 100 session before I post it and use actuals.

Cheers LS


Tangram

LS,

It must be taking you bloody ages to go through all those spins. If you like, I can knock together some code to extract the QS's from an actuals file I have. That way you might get some of your life back.  ;)

By the way, at 181 units per 20,000 spins, it would take you 66 days watching 300 spins per day (what's that, an 8 hour day?) to make them.
If you can maintain that over 60,000 spins, betting £500 chips, you would have made about £100,000, and could take the rest of the year off.  :)

It would probably drive you mad with boredom though.

lucky_strike

Thanks Tangram for you kind words...
Its hell to make them by hand... :)

But how about this  ::)

80 Sessions for 20 000

Some basics...

1) Singels contra series (two ways to do it...)
2) Series contra singels
3) Series of 2 contra larger series
4) Series of 3 contra larger series

Track all 3 EC for 4 hours using a team ??? I don´t know i just want to explore CPM...

Now lets make it deep water... and I told you it is huge...

Singels contra singels (series contra series of singels)

That's why my head is on overload, math, probability, statistics and specific measurements... ;)

And I already have the proof of various ways to make it but it isn't by my work.
I like to have my own statistics to base my opinions on, its a great way of learning...

Cheers LS

lucky_strike

Could you code series of 2 contra larger series???

Cheers LS

Tangram

QuoteCould you code series of 2 contra larger series???

Sure. In fact I could do much better and extract all the QS for each one in your list:

1) Singels contra series (two ways to do it...)
2) Series contra singels
3) Series of 2 contra larger series
4) Series of 3 contra larger series

The only one I'm not sure about is 1). But if you're only using 3) for this test it will take less time so perhaps I could write the code for it and add the rest later. Are you getting the same results for each of 1) through 4)?

Tangram

-