Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The old VLS is dead.

Started by GARNabby, April 20, 2010, 10:16:00 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

I have cookies

QuoteDo you claim you can out guess even money distribution ? using Masse Ègale !

Lets assume you have an tendency towards some-thing ! then your attemps have to overcome the minimum to achive +1 with out increase you bet size ! is that what you and Spike claim ?

That was an polite question to take it back to basics ...

Lets talk scale and masse égale - here is an exampel just to illustrate the basics ...

Whit seven attempts to gain at least +1 as minimum - wish has to over come the amount of attemps - seven in this paricular exampel ...

87/35

920108 +1
920108 +1
920115 +1
920124 +1
920127 +1
920131 +1
920205 +1
920207 +1
920211 +1
920213 +1
920214 +1
920218 .X
920219 .X
920302 +1
920325 -7
920406 +1
920428 +1
920519 -7
920520 +1
920527 +1
920609 +1
920612 +1
920613 +1
920617 +1
920622 +1
920716 +1
920720 +1
920723 +1
920729 +1
920810 .X
920818 +1
920820 +1
920824 +1
920826 +1
920827 +1
920903 +1
920904 +1
920909 .X
920915 +1
920923 +1
920924 +1
920930 +1
921002 +1
921005 +1
921005 +1
921014 +1
921022 +1
921024 +1
921027 +1
921030 +1
921101 +1
921111 +1
921112 +1
921112 +1
921114 +1
921116 +1
921117 +1
921120 -7
921209 +1
921212 +1
921215 +1
921219 +1
921221 +1
921222 +1
930113 +1
930114 +1
930117 -7
930117 +1
930204 +1
930204 +1
930221 +1
930223 +1
930301 +1
930302 +1
930304 +1
930304 .X
930305 +-0
930307 +1
930324 +1
930326 +1
930330 +1
930331 +1
930406 -7
930406 +1
930407 +1
930425 +1
930428 +1
930507 +1
930507 +1
930510 +1
930516 +1
930517 +1
930520 +1
930529 +1
930601 +1
930622 +1
930626 +1
930628 +1

Cheers

Bayes

QuoteIts just like reading a map.

"A map is a visual representation of an area—a symbolic depiction highlighting relationships between elements of that space such as objects, regions, and themes." - wikipedia

To read a map presupposes the area already exists, which is not the case with random numbers not yet spun. The missing element is time, which Spike obviously thinks is a minor detail! The analogy is absurd and just another example of Spike messing with your minds. Don't fall for it people. Give Spike the attention he deserves - none.

I have cookies

QuoteThe analogy is absurd and just another example of Spike messing with your minds.

Sure - words is an intressting thing - that is why it is so fun to get back to kindergarden level - to see what is what ...

Cheers

Spike!

Do you claim you can out guess even money distribution>>

The correct answer is 'duh'.

Spike!

A map is a visual representation of an area>>

And the past spins are a visual representation of where the random has recently been. There are all kinds of maps, this is just one more.

I have cookies

QuoteDo you claim you can out guess even money distribution>>

The correct answer is 'duh'.

This is an perfect exampel how to avoid certan things ...

Do you at any moment increase you bets - yes you do - and still you claim that you use masse égale ...

Do you claim to have 72% hit ratio - any one can achive that - if they increase there bets ...

How many attempts do you use 123456789 to get an positive return - not intressting any more as you incrase you bets and still claim that you use masse égale ...

Conclustion = Spike can not use Masse Ègale and achive the minimum +1 to overcome the amount of attempts he try to do so - with out increasing hes bets at some moment during the play ...

That is an true statment ...

Cheers

Cheers

Spike!

any one can achive that - if they increase there bets ...>>

I never use a progression, flat bet only.

masse égale>>>

Is that a car or the name of a sandwich?

I have cookies


Perspective - that word taste great - dont you agree ...

Cheers

Spike!

with out increasing hes bets at some moment during the play ...That is an true statment ...>>>

No, its as far from the truth as you can get. I never EVER use progressions, I've only ststed that about 1000 times on GG. Don't get too big for your britches, Lucky Strike.

I have cookies

Quoteany one can achive that - if they increase there bets ...>>

I never use a progression, flat bet only.

masse égale>>>

Is that a car or the name of a sandwich?

Sorry - back to kindergarden level - Spike does not flat betting and achive the minimum to gain +1 to overcome the amount of attempts to do so - it is an false positive - illusion ...

Any one can do what Spike and Gizmo does - as at some moment during the play they increase there bet size - that is not flat betting ...

Cheers

I have cookies


Taste this word - Basics ...

Cheers

Spike!

as at some moment during the play they increase there bet size ->>>

Prove it. You can't because you're clueless as to what I do. This conversation is stupid.

I have cookies

QuoteThis conversation is stupid.

Yes it is - as you dont dear to say it - exampel - I claim I have an 72% to gain at least +1 with only 3 attempts wish not overcome the amount I succed to gain +1 ...

Taste this word - flat betting ...

Cheers

Bayes

QuoteAnd the past spins are a visual representation of where the random has recently been. There are all kinds of maps, this is just one more.

The PURPOSE  of a map is to tell you where you need to go, or to relate different areas and distances to each other. What use would a map be which doesn't cover the location you're moving towards? With random you are always in uncharted territory - you are always off the map.

Bayes

QuoteHence the immunity against ever being proven wrong.>>>

I have no idea what that means.   You think because your because your 3rd grade teacher can do long division, and you can't, that makes her an idiot and you brilliant.

It doesn't.

More gibberish. Nobody denies that long division is possible, even if they can't do it. That's because there is logical and empirical evidence that it exists! On the other hand, there is no evidence of what you claim, other than you merely telling us over and over. The very notion of "reading random" is an oxymoron.

The burden of proof is on those who make the claims.

Bayes

-