LAST WON COLS DOZENS tweak check newest update.

[bikemotorman]

HEY GUYS I HAVE CHANGED THE TITLE.

THE RULES.

WE PLAY ONLY TWO COLUMNS OR TWO DOZENS AT ONE TIME, ALTERNATING THE WHOLE TIME.

IF YOU HIT A ZERO JUST BACKTRACK AND PLAY WHAT IS NEXT COLUMN OR DOZEN.

LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS





IF YOU HIT A ZERO JUST KEEP GOING

YOU USE THE PROGRESSION BELOW

5-5-5-15-45-135-200    THESE ARE FIVE DOLLAR UNITS



GIVE IT A GO I THINK THIS METHOD CAN MAKE MONEY IF YOU USE THE LWS BY Steve.


STUART

[Jish]

Betting on history does not work, many people have tried variations of it and they all fail (in the long run) you could get lucky though.

i have a new theory now that EVERY system is a winner untill you lose real money on it

[hermes]

This could work! Dozens and columns are antagonists most of the time what means that if one makes chops the other makes streaks. It has to be tested. With Wiztek 12 spin progression it could work. I discovered something similar by tweaking Hammy's dozens and will post at Hammy's thread when I have a time.

[Kingspin]

Tried this on dublin bet rng. Bankroll went from £500 up to £575 playing 5 pound chips.  Then lost the full bankroll within 4 minutes.
Thats roulette..

[bikemotorman]

YOU SHOULD USE A SMALLER UNIT SIZE.

I USE FIVE DOLLAR UNITS WE WILL SEE IF IT HOLDS UP, I MAY HAVE TO PLAY VIRTUAL FOR A FEW SPINS BEFORE IT STARTS GETTING BAD.

THIS IS LIKE MY SYSTEM FROM LAST YEAR.

LAST LOST DOZENS

LAST WON DOZENS


STUART

[Number Six]

ANY IDEAS

Turn off Caps Lock?

[bikemotorman]

AFTER SOME TESTING THE RESULTS ARE VERY GOOD.

SO GOOD THAT IT IS SCARING ME
I HAVE GONE TO PLAYING, LAST COLUMNS LAST DOZENS ONLY.
THE SINGLE COLUMNS AND LAST DOZEN ONLY IS TOO HARD FOR ME I WOULD HAVE TO GO WAY UP ON THE PROGRESSION.

HERE IS HOW TO PLAY IT BELOW IF YOU HIT A ZERO KEEP GOING.

LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS


CAN SOMEBODY TEST THIS I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW IT HOLDS UP, IT SURE IS ON JEBET AND REALWELL.


STUART BRANDT

[bikemotorman]

I FORGOT TO MENTION YOU ARE ALTERNATING BETWEEN THE LAST WON COLUMNS AND THEN TO THE LAST WON DOZENS, FOR SOME REASON WHEN YOU ADD THE COLUMNS YOU SEEM TO LOSE LESS.
BUT I THINK SOMEONE SAID THE COLS ACT THE OPPOSITE OF DOZENS.



STUART

[bikemotorman]

I HAVE DONE A BUNCH OF TESTING AND THE IDEA IS WORKING WELL.

I THINK I SAW THE MOST FOUR LOSSES IN A ROW, IF I WERE TO USE A VIRTUAL PLAY AND WAIT FOR LETS SAY 3 LLLS
IN A ROW THEN PLAY WITH MONEY THIS WOULD WORK PRETTY WELL.
WHEN I WAS MESSING WITH THIS METHOD LAST YEAR I ONLY PLAYED LWD, THEN LLD.
IT SEEMS INTRODUCING THE COLUMNS HAS PUT A STRANGE TWIST ON THIS IDEA OF THIS METHOD.

SO PLAY LIKE SO BELOW IS REALLY PUSHING THE ENVELOPE A BIT NOW IT POSSIBLE THAT THE COLUMNS SKIP BACK AND FORTH WITH THE DOZENS BUT YOU NEVER KNOW.
ZERO COULD ALSO HIT SIX TIMES IN A ROW TOO I THINK THEY HAD A WHEEL DO THAT IN VEGAS, I THINK TWO YEARS AGO LOL.
NOW PEOPLE LOOK TO PLAY ZERO ON THAT WHEEL ALL THE TIME LOL.

LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS
LAST WON COLUMNS
LAST WON DOZENS



LET ME KNOW IF YOU CAN TEST THIS ON 100,000 SPINS.

STUART BRANDT

[bikemotorman]

I did more testing and it still is holding up well now I need to come up with a plan to use lws on this and maybe a small progression.
This deal is strange by adding the Columns I now am losing less lol.
Could someone test this on a double zero wheel it may do well.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

Well I had some fun on Jbet today with my method and did well too.
I played the same method.

LWCS
LWDS

Guys I need someone to test this on oo wheel here in the states.
Who is up to the task and of good reputation.
I will front some cash if I have too for gas.

Let me know.

Stuart

[hermes]

I just finished 30 minutes play of your remarkable system on RNGs and grind like Scrooge $50 with $1 minimum and with Wiztek progression. I have an idea! What about bet the same dozen or column after win (let it ride) for catching the streaks. It happens many times that even the same number come 2 times in row. Change to opposite gender (D/C) only if loss. The idea is let the streaks exploit by preserving the bankroll.
Hermes

[bikemotorman]

Hi Hermes I will work on it you understand I am playing last two columns that came or last two dozens that came on this post.
I think this is a long term winner if you use the lws registry like Lanky or Victor this is a long term winner in my opinion.
If the player plays with my method then utilize the LWS they should do well the most losses I have seen in row is three on single 0 wheel, the american wheel should be a bit worse.
You should cover the ZeroS when you use bigger bets like Steve Morgan or Lanky they always cover Zeros with there method.

Stuart

[Jeromin]

Just played for an hour in DB ( play money ).  basic bet 10 u per dozen/column. Progression: 1-2-6-18. From 500u to 665u in 58 minutes. maximum losses in a row: 2. Never went below initial bankroll.

I could play this at the local mechanical wheel, if it wins about 2 out of 3 spins, that's €40 an hour, with a 1-2-6-18-54 progression.  Bankroll: €164 ( plus a bit extra for zero ), double bankroll in 4 hours...  Loses only with 5 L in a row in less than 160 spins.. 

I'd love to see the max number of losses in 100,000 spins, and the number of 4L and 5 L.

[Number Six]

None of you seem to understand that this won't work, why or even how to test it properly. You can't judge the merit of a bet selection, with or without a progression, by playing a few hundred spins or an hour on a live wheel. Sorry to break it to you, but your findings and your research thus far is utterly meaningless. Literally, it is all irrelevant. People tend to complain about losing because they test a bet for two or three hundred spins and think they've got the grail. They shoot off to the casino and lose their shirt in the first session.

You need to test at least 5,000 bets before you can start to gauge how good a system is. 10,000  bets is better. In that sample you will likely learn about what your maximum drawdown could be, what SD that represents, how much worse it could possibly get and how exposed you are to ruin etc. This is all vital information and you can't get it by analysing a few hundred spins, which is how 95% of members of this forum test their bet selections - that's why everyone here thinks, and many claim, that they've got a winning system. You need to learn RX coding or even excel, so you can test these types of progressions bets quickly and easily. Then you can bin them, move on and waste another three months messing round with another great idea.

[Number Six]

-