LAST WON COLS DOZENS tweak check newest update.

[bikemotorman]

Was that on a 00 wheel, I have seen at the most on Jebet 3 losses in a row but that sure may not be the session from hell.
Thanks for your help, I will be testing on Jebet later today.

Stuart

[Jeromin]

Wiesbaden , single 0. File available in actuals/permanences section, posted by Homeito.

[hermes]

Backtesting is non-sense guys, it doesn't matter if it is on roulette or stocks and currency trading!!! Past and present are most of the time different. Only forwards testing on Forex is accurate and the same is valid for game testings. Only real game testing gives real results (not RNGs).
Long time ago I had a HG for a half a year and then lost 6 times in row, all real casino wheels!
Hermes

[bikemotorman]

Is there a problem with JEBET I keep losing my connection.
I was testing my method and kept getting the connection cut oh well I guess no more testing on Jebet.

I am in the US.

Stuart

[Jeromin]

I was just thinking: with this system there's no need to decide whether to start with dozens or colums, they both work. It follows then, that if you bet on both at the same time,  you'd do twice as well. If not, then why alternate? The only trick would be to keep track of loses, not for columns vs. dozens, but for "threads", i.e., track the d/c/d/c and the c/d/c/d threads separately. Practically impossible in your head, doable on paper.
In theory, it'd be no more risky than playing two consecutive sessions ( though you'd need to double the bankroll ), in practice one loss might be offset by a win in the parallel thread .Does it make sense?

[bikemotorman]

Are you saying playing last columns and last dozens in unison not alternating at all I might get dizzy lol.
How many numbers would we cover at the same time, I am getting dizzy just thinking about it I would assume one bankroll for columns
One bankroll for dozens.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

Now I really have a headache jeromin you can try playing the both in unison but that would be hedging yes I guess.

Stuart

[Jeromin]

Yes you do alternate. In reality, it's like playing two different games in the same table. One thread may be winning, while the other is in the middle of a progression. I was thinking that somehow one of the games might compensate for the losses in the other, but I tested it and they are quite independent. It's just an unecessary complication.

[bikemotorman]

How many losses have you seen in a row.
I like to alternate columns then dozens Hermes posted that columns ying while dozens yang.
Maybe whe can get a balanced win lol.

Stuart

Do any of these online casinos accept US players yet.

I would be willing to play a hundred bucks worth.

[hermes]

Saint Jeromin, if you play 2 independent games (opposite phases) you need 2 bankrolls, one for each but you should expect win also double? On the other hand we should not let advice our decisions by greed.
Bike, I am afraid they accept from USA only Obama but he plays only Texas Hold Them poker.
Hermes

[Jeromin]

Win double on average, but not offset a loss with a win, as they are independent, which was my initial idea. The two bets are independent. This was probably obvious for any smart person, but I had to check it to find out  Which means, I might as well simply double the unit value and double the bankroll, less complication and same result on average.

[bikemotorman]

Hermes how does the leveller progression go with five dollar units also are you in the US.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

I PLAYED ON JEBET TODAY AND DID PRETTY GOOD.

THIS IS ONE HOUR OF PLAY.



PLAY LAST COLUMNS THEN  LAST DOZENS NON STOP FIVE DOLLAR UNITS


WLWLWWWWWLWWLWWWWWLWWLWWWWWWLWLWWWWWLW

THIS WAS ALTERNATING THE WHOLE SESSION I WAS AHEAD 200 DOLLARS WITH FIVE DOLLAR UNITS, AFTER A LOSS I WOULD UP TO 15 DOLLARS ON THE LAST COLUMNS OR DOZENS.


STUART

[Jeromin]

Win double on average, but not offset a loss with a win, as they are independent, which was my initial idea. The two bets are independent.

On further testing, there actually seem not to be independet, but positively correlated. I was hoping they'd be negatively correlated. In a very bad session ( DB ) , from the ones posted by sushie in the  actuals section  starting with dozens or with columns, I get almost the same result: 24w 18 L vs. 23W 17L. It's atypical though. In most cases, the win/loss ration  is slightly batter than 2/1. So, crisscrossing only doubles the danger of a bad session.

[Jeromin]

Ok, I've done some testing with the actuals posted by sushie and Gogocro. 9 sessions:

ratio of wins to losses ( theoretical ratio 2, excluding zero)

2.9, 2.4, 2.3, 3.1, 1.3, 2.2, 2.4, 2.8, 2

Biggest win: 23u ( also longest session, 61 spins )
Biggest Loss 1u
Biggest drawdown: 43 u.

Progression: hermes' Leveller system:

1-2-4-8, continue with 8/8 till reaching initial BR.

It's a small sample, but the win loss ratio so far is higher than the expected 2/1. Also, there's two LLLL and four LLL.

[Jeromin]

-