ONE SMART METHOD THAT WORKS

[Herb6]

Here's what I can't figure out.



Why can't you guys build on the documented knowledge of others?



Why are you still trying to figure out a system to beat the game of roulette, when it's already a known fact that it can't be beaten?  This is not even open for debate.  The prove is solid. When you look down this road, you will find that others have been there about 100 + years ahead of you.



Why do any of you think all of the those encyclopedias and mathematicians are wrong?
Claiming they are wrong is a sign of ignorance.   Attempting to do the same thing over and over, while expecting a different outcome is also insane.  



What you should be doing is building upon the information that is already known as fact.  Learn from the people that have already been down this road over the last 100+ years.  Read the encyclopedias and about the history of the game.



Here are the facts on which you should be building your methods:



1. You can beat the gaming device by exploiting it's non random nature.  (Exploiting the normal wear and tear and design flaws.)

2. You can also predict where the ball will land with enough accuracy to beat the house edge. (Various forms of visual ballistics.)

-Herb

[albalaha]

Exactly Spike,
                  this system has no fate. Either you need a very dangerous progression or you lose per spin.

[bikemotorman]

HERB THAT IS A OUTSTANDING POST AND MAYBE A LITTLE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL.
SO WEAR AND TEAR ON WHEEL.
OK HOW DO I WORK ON THAT ONE.

               STUART

[bikemotorman]

I PLAYED A SESSION THIS MORNING AND FLAT BET THE WHOLE TIME I HAD THE LONGEST WINNING STREAK I THINK IT WAS OVER 17 ON THE DOZENS.
THEN I HAD 13 OR 14 WINS ON THE COLS AFTER A LOSS ON THE DOZS.
I HAVE A HARD TIME WITH PLAYING VIRTUAL AT TIMES SO I THOUGHT WELL IF AND WHEN I GET A BUNCH OF LLLS I WOULD FLAT BET AT 5 DOLLARS EACH OF THE DOZENS OR COLS.
THE PLAN WAS TO STAY FLAT UNTIL 4 OR 5 LLLLS THEN GO UP TO 100 THEN 200 ON THE COLS OR DOZS I WAS PLAYING.
I ONLY GOT THREE LLLS IN A ROW BUT OVER 30 WINS AND THIS WAS IN A ONE HOUR SESSION.
THE DEALER WAS VAL, MAN HE WAS DOING A SPIN ABOUT EVERY 65 SECONDS.
I HAVE A BETTER TIME PLAYING FLAT BECAUSE I TEND TO PAY BETTER ATTENTION.
I MAY LOSE 50 DOLLARS PLAYING FLAT UNTIL I GET 4 OR 5 LLLLS BUT IT KEEPS ME MORE FOCUSED, IT IS JUST ME I GUESS.
OH I PLAYED ON JEBET AT 330 EST TIME SO VAL HAD NO WARM BODIES NEXT TO HIM LOL.

HOW DO I FAIR FLAT ON TWO DOZS OR COLS DO WE BRAKE EVEN OR WHAT.
NOW REMEMBER I FLAT UNTIL 5 OR 6 LLLLLS OK.

                STUART

[bikemotorman]

Just did a 39 minute session on jebet I had 5 Ls in 19 minutes I only reached five then five or six spins later I had LLL then I won on the fourth then I got a zero lol.
I always cover zero.

Situational strategy   so far is working for me.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

Ok I played in reno at circus circus.
My method held up very well I started on the dozens as I always do and the results on the 0 00 wheel were what I expected.
I will report more later.

Stuart

[buffalowizard]

Hi Stuart mate

Been a while. So you still play this system - Seen anymore 7 losses? Hope you've got all your profits back and more.

BW

[bikemotorman]

Nope I have not seen more then 5 LLLLLs in months.
A pit boss stood behind me for thirty minutes asking me what I was doing.
I told him I am using a situational method with a virtual loss method combined.
He said what is that and walked away.

Stuart

[buffalowizard]

Are you playing by any strict rules or just improvising on the day? That is, are you waiting for 2 virtual Losses and stick to the same progression.

Cheers

[buffalowizard]

-