Even chances system (variation Steve Morgan)

[bikemotorman]

Hi Folks,

Today I had 8 dont passes in a row, that is with the 2s 3s and 12s during the come out roll.
Of course I was not betting at the time I had to wait for my triples and my pass as the trigger to play.

PDP
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
PPP
D
D
D
P ---------------------------------------       

I started playing on the pass that is my trigger to play, I dont reverse the results or anything like that.
I remember lucky said to wait for three triples but so far I just wait for two, I dont know if this is good or bad.


Stuart

[bikemotorman]

Well just played some more take a look.
It seems the Dont pass dominated today.

D
PPDLW
D
D
D
D
D
PDDWW
D
PDDWW
D
D
D
D
D
PDDWW
D
D
PDDWL
PDDLL
PDPWW
PPDLL
D
PDPWL
D
D
D
PDPLW
PDD
D
PPP


DONE

Stuart 

[lucky_strike]

  bikemotorman send me an PM with your email...

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

I remember lucky said to wait for three triples but so far I just wait for two, I dont know if this is good or bad.

I wrote this and its about random aginst random with one static rule.

You can pick any outcomes you want randomly, as long they all begin with the same if you divide them into 3.
Here is some random bet selections.

BBBBBPBBP
PBPPPBPPP

BBPBPPBBPBPB
PPBPBPPPBPBB

The static rule is that every sequense of 3 start with the same outcome.

BBB BBP BBP
PBP PPB PPP

BBP BPP BBP BPB
PPB PBP PPB PBB

No bet selection will be the same as the previos one, so you will never play with or against the same sequense twice.
You get reducing bets if you use every third to become an indicator to what to play with or against or you could just go for same / oppisite for all trails.

Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play with the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 18 trails with 6 steps of wagering.



Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play against the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 18 trails with 6 steps of wagering.



Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play with the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 24 trails with 8 steps of wagering.



Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play against the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 24 trails with 8 steps of wagering.



Cheers Lucky Strike

[lucky_strike]

Here you have 2 random bet selection with one static rule with 3 tripels.

[numbers]
1
2
2
2 2
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
1
1
2 2
2 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
1 1    
1   
1  
1
1
2    
1
2
1    
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2

Here you can see that you should aim for singels and series of two.
There is different ways to do that.

211211222
221211221
sosssssso

sos
sss
sso

221211221
212212222
soossosso

soo
sso
sso
[/numbers]

[bikemotorman]

I guess the b is for dont pass and the p is for pass correct on your post.

D
D
D
D
PPP HERE I WOULD PLAY DD
D
D
D
PPD HERE I WOULD PLAY DP
P


SHOULD I PLAY THE REVERSE OF THE RESULTS.
NOW I HAVE MY SELECTIONS AND MY TRIGGER.

STUART

[lucky_strike]

Here is your result regarding 3 tripels...

PDP
PPP
PPD
PDD
PDD
PDD

PDPPPPPPD
PDDPDDPDD
ssoooosos

sso
ooo
sos

PDD
PDD
PDP
PPD
PDP
PDP

PDDPDDPDP
PPDPDPPDP
sosssosss

sos
sso
sss

Well you do what you think is best bike.
But I think like this that I would not get a sequense of 18 trails where all of them are the same and I only place 6 bets.
Then I ask my self what is the probability to get two sequenses of 18 in a row that would produce the same and give us a total of 12 bets.

That would be the same thing as getting 3 series of 6 in a row "twice".
[colorsb]BBBBBBPPPPPPBBBBBBPPPPPPBBBBBBPPPPPP[/colorsb]

Its easy to make a code and run it and see how many times you will hit two sequenses of 18 with 3 x 6 in a row twice in a row in one billion trails.

There is an random element that change with the random flow every time you play and you have to win the lotteri of 1 million to lose 12 bets in a row.

The first progression should produce a profit or break even.
The secound progression should produce a break even point and exept a loss limit it the end.

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

Well one thing is for sure i don't think there is any other way that give you so littel action in 8 hours.

WLWLWWWLWWLWW

[numbers]
2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1
2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1

SOS W
SSO
SOS
   
2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2

SSO LW
SSS
SOO

2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1
2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

SSO LW
SSS
SSO

2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2
2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1

SOO W
SOO
SOO

2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2

SOS W
SOS
SOS

2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2
2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2

SSO LW
SSO
SOS

2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2

SOO W
SOS
SSS

2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2
2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2

SSO LW
SOS
SSS

2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1

SSO W
SOS
SSS
[/numbers]

Cheers LS

[I have cookies]

Well I think I will elaborate and put some life to this thread.

I never succeed during testing getting so high hit ratio as when I test random against random - around 60 to 65 %
So I will see it I can remember and refresh my mind.

One thing that strike my mind is that static rule i apply - the only rule.
Will run some samples and continue.

[I have cookies]

Well I think I will elaborate and put some life to this thread.

I never succeed during testing getting so high hit ratio as when I test random against random - around 60 to 65 %
So I will see it I can remember and refresh my mind.

One thing that strike my mind is that static rule I apply - the only rule.
Will run some samples and continue.

To illustrate this i want to use the gap from one pick of a random pick of 9 following the static rule.
That is the bet selection or state.

The random pick of 9 following the static rule has its own sismographic drawings - so we are going to look into the future and see how close or far away the same random pick appears - then the gap between does two is the sequence of winnings and loses - but not a total loss as you are with in the gap and pin point out winnings using skips.

[I have cookies]

Random against random with one static rule and with one random walk

Assume you track 100 trails from one table - then for the next future 100 you list them next to your previous 100 and play random against random using one random walk with or with out one static rule.

What is the options - are we going to play that the previous wont repeat - that would be obvious and then it would be like playing against one parameter that goes up and down - like a pendal.

I believe there is more advance ways as the outcomes clustering in certain ways.
Assume we would clustering our previous 100 into series of three with our future 100 - then each sequence will have both one opposite hit and same with a hit ratio around 7 in 8 possibility's.

The random walk even give the option and room for educated guess work to certain degree regarding both direction hitting with in three.
Some one could allways play opposite if a win then play same and win twice and if a loss win once with in three.

I will post some samples following different ways to apply one random walk using the previous 100.
One static rule can be using the pendal and apply that the previos 100 wont go oppisite for 100 or same for 100 - then we would have one simpel static rule to follow and still play random against random using our random walk.

Here is one sampel from today.

1
2
2

2
2
1

1
2
1

2
2
2

2
1
2

2    
1   
2

1
2
1

1
2
1

2
1
1

2
2
2

2
2
1

1
2
1

1
1
2

1
1
2

2
1
1 <<< 50 Around 50 trails

1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
1

1
2
1

1
1
1

1
2
2

2
1
1

1
1
2

2
1
2

2
1
2

1
1
2

2
2
1

2
2
1

1
2
2

2
1
1

[I have cookies]

Random against random with one static rule and with one random walk

This sampel is using one march witch i mention above.
50 previos and 50 future ones with one static rule and one random walk.

WLWWWWLWLWWLWWLLWLLWLL

1 1
2 1 W
2 1

2 1
2 1 L
1 1 W

1 1
2 1 W
1 1

2 1
2 2 W
2 1

2 1
1 1 W
2 1

2 1  
1 2 L  
2 2 W

1 2
2 1 L
1 1 W

1 1
2 1 W
1 2

2 2
1 1 L
1 2 W

2 2
2 1 W
2 2

2 1
2 1 L
1 2 L

1 2
2 2 W
1 1

1 2
1 2 L
2 1 L

1 1
1 2 W
2 2

2 2
1 1 L
1 1 L

[albertojonas]

ended +2?

[albertojonas]

-