"crackers randomness course"

[crackers]

Let's try this by focusing on a single randomness characteristic. This way  it will not get
bogged down in all the other characteristics. I'll get right to the important stuff first.

This will be an in depth discussion of the sleeping dozen or sleeping column. Does that
need an explanation? On average a dozen or column will sleep up to 15 consecutive
spins every 150 spins. That can be proven. What people want to know is how do you
catch those trends without losing so much in the process that it makes it worthless
trying. I'm going to teach how to attack the opportunities. I'm going to teach how to
minimise the losses. In fact it's relatively easy.

[crackers]

Let's  mention some basics.

Useful Bankroll:

2,500 total bankroll.
500 each useful bankroll for each session.
200 loss limit per session. (+300 and out)

Minimum bet level 5
Maximum bet level 25

Retreat at minimum. attack at maximum.

[crackers]

Primary goal is to attack the win streaks and to retreat durring the downturns. The
sleeping dozen only gives you a bet selection choice. It never guarantees results.
What happens after the ball drops into a slot is what guarantees results. If you
keep track you will have a win loss record. What matters is getting into the
rhythm of synchronizing your attacks with consecutive wins. If that coincidentally
coincides with the trends then you have a moment that the trend confirms the
win streak. Many times the trend will not confirm the streak. But most of the time
it will. Any loss is a confirmation that the bet selection is not confirming the streak.

Don't attack durring a non working streak. That's the time to retreat at minimum
levels.

[Robeenhuut]

Let's try this by focusing on a single randomness characteristic. This way  it will not get
bogged down in all the other characteristics. I'll get right to the important stuff first.

This will be an in depth discussion of the sleeping dozen or sleeping column. Does that
need an explanation? On average a dozen or column will sleep up to 15 consecutive
spins every 150 spins. That can be proven. What people want to know is how do you
catch those trends without losing so much in the process that it makes it worthless
trying. I'm going to teach how to attack the opportunities. I'm going to teach how to
minimise the losses. In fact it's relatively easy.

Hello Crackers

Before you start your randomness course you have to start a basic probability course. My binomial calculator shows that 1 DZ sleeps 15 spins on average once in 300+ spins. 

Regards

[crackers]

Before you start your randomness course you have to start a basic probability course. My binomial calculator shows that 1 DZ sleeps 15 spins on average once in 300+ spins. 

That sounds about right.  What about six sets of dozens? You have three sets of dozens
and three sets of columns just from the outside bet choices. I tend to average three
long sleepers from among all six in 150 spins.  What's the math for that?

[Robeenhuut]

That sounds about right.  What about six sets of dozens? You have three sets of dozens
and three sets of columns just from the outside bet choices. I tend to average three
long sleepers from among all six in 150 spins.  What's the math for that?

Thats a different story. You did not give a full explanation in your previous post 

[crackers]

Thats a different story. You did not give a full explanation in your previous post 

Maybe the sleeping dozen needs an explanation after all. It's very simple 1 - 12 is
dozen one. 13 - 24 is dozen two. 25 - 36 is dozen three. 1 to 34 is column one.
2 to 35 is column two. 3 to 36 is column three. These are the six sets of dozens.

[crackers]

Just in case any of you can't figure out how to bet on the sleeping dozen the answer
is that you don't. You place an equal sized bet on the other two dozens or other two
columns. The idea is that the sleeping dozen doesn't hit while the other two are still
active.

[Turner]

I remember the first time i got into roulete, the first system/idea I read was to wait until a doz hadnt hit for 5 spins then bet on it....which works now and again, but generally doesnt. Think about it....if you run RX for any 250-300 groups of hits downloaded from any of the german casinos in RX, you see that DZ/COL very rarely hit a max interval less than 9, usually 13/14 and I have seen the odd 25 (Ive never seen more)

Its horrible ideas like this which make you look further. This idea is a good one. Its good because i can say why I am doing it. "I believe a Doz has lagged behind so it is due". Thats good...but when?. If i find a 22 max then I have to progress 18 of them (I started at 5)
Theres the roulette mantra...."but when"

i like to look at the oposite. Alan Turing Did just this. he would find a solution that nearly worked, and try and do the oposite to find what was being hinted at in the faulty version.

So whats the oposite of the classic wait 5 then bet on that Doz?.Well...... Wait 5 then dont bet on that dozen because it doesnt work (ive seen it go 15 spins etc)

So Doz 1 hasnt hit for 5 spins, we bet on 2 and 3.

In some fun tests of about 50 times, I have made (virtually) double that of betting on the expectant Doz/Col. Its not tested enough to nail it to the mast.

Just an idea.

Same progression on a loss 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27. Dont progress if the loss didnt go lower than the new high at the start of this particular bet

[Turner]

Well no one will believe me....but I typed that without reading all the posts. lol.....and I went back in to read it and Crackers had already posted it.
Always read all the posts...or you look a berk.

Turner

[WARRIOR]

I remember the first time I got into roulete, the first system/idea I read was to wait until a doz hadnt hit for 5 spins then bet on it....which works now and again, but generally doesn't. Think about it....if you run RX for any 250-300 groups of hits downloaded from any of the german casinos in RX, you see that DZ/COL very rarely hit a max interval less than 9, usually 13/14 and I have seen the odd 25 (Ive never seen more)

Its horrible ideas like this which make you look further. This idea is a good one. Its good because I can say why I am doing it. "I believe a Doz has lagged behind so it is due". Thats good...but when?. If I find a 22 max then I have to progress 18 of them (I started at 5)
Theres the roulette mantra...."but when"

I like to look at the oposite. Alan Turing Did just this. he would find a solution that nearly worked, and try and do the oposite to find what was being hinted at in the faulty version.

So whats the oposite of the classic wait 5 then bet on that Doz?.Well...... Wait 5 then dont bet on that dozen because it doesn't work (ive seen it go 15 spins etc)

So Doz 1 hasnt hit for 5 spins, we bet on 2 and 3.

In some fun tests of about 50 times, I have made (virtually) double that of betting on the expectant Doz/Col. Its not tested enough to nail it to the mast.

Just an idea.

Same progression on a loss 1-1,3-3,9-9,27-27. Dont progress if the loss didnt go lower than the new high at the start of this particular bet

The opposite should be tested as this was the first system I used.

[crackers]

I mean no disrespect to any newbies here but I track 20 independent sets of dozens at
once and can go on for ten to twelve hours of continuous play at my pleasure. Frankly I
don't care if any of you haven't been blessed with abundant concentration capacity.
Perhaps there is no holy grail in all this. Perhaps its something as simple as global
mass. If this is a case where I can assimilate vast amounts of common information
then  I apologise for the past six years. I'm just another anguished genius tormented
by my own personal quest to make my mark.

p.s. AJ - eat me f..k stick   

[Turner]

Maybe the sleeping dozen needs an explanation after all. It's very simple 1 - 12 is
dozen one. 13 - 24 is dozen two. 25 - 36 is dozen three. 1 to 34 is column one.
2 to 35 is column two. 3 to 36 is column three. These are the six sets of dozens.

Im gonna check out some other posts. Im out....lol

[cheese]

Looks like Gizmo has deserted his faithful students again,
just like he always does when he starts a thread like this.
A few people question his genius and he he takes his toys
and goes home. I think he has ADD, this happens all the
time.

[crackers]

Wrong again father roulette. The people that already have this figured out have
clearly made it known that they get it. It's clear as anyone can see that they
are not interested in getting it out to the masses. I'm convinced it takes
people that find a way to see the most opportunity possible in order to
give themselves the widest possible chance of success. That alone excludes
you Spike.

Looks like Gizmo has deserted his faithful students again,
just like he always does when he starts a thread like this.
A few people question his genius and he he takes his toys
and goes home. I think he has ADD, this happens all the
time.

[crackers]

-