"crackers randomness course"

[crackers]

Hey Spike. You are all alone now.

[Robeenhuut]

I hope that  "crackers vs cheese" exchange goes on 4ever.    When did you start it guys?  I dont want 2 miss anything 

[cheese]

Hey Spike. You are all alone now.

I'm never here when you're gone, there's nothing
to entertain me.

[iggiv]

I hope that  "crackers vs cheese" exchange goes on 4ever.    When did you start it guys?  I dont want 2 miss anything 

They met each other in a period of Stan wojenny and Cold War, since then they are always together.

[Robeenhuut]

They met each other in a period of Stan wojenny and Cold War, since then they are always together.

I see Iggiv. Brothers in arms 

[crackers]

I hope that  "crackers vs cheese" exchange goes on 4ever.    When did you start it guys?  I dont want 2 miss anything 

You actually set me on to a new course. When you asked me to check out the odds
for a single dozen to repeat sleeping. I was wasting my time with EC data on my
tracking cards. I moved on to fitting 15 unique dozens on a single 5/7 index card.
Unlike Spike, I don't get all tuckered out after an hour of play. The guy knows
nothing about trend tracking and opportunities in dozen play. He hangs his
hat on 50/50 pay and one single bet at a time. In fact he uses it as some kind
of magic shield. It's a lame argument to say 50/50 = 1 and 33/66 = 1 do not
equate. I've let him go on for years with his Barney Fife bullet in his shirt
pocket. Honestly, I've expected someone to have pounced all over this for
many years. But there that is. Right there in your face, simple arithmetic.

[crackers]

WOW! What are the chances for this. My 333 post here is about 33/66 odds.

additional reference : simple arithmetic includes rounding integers, the pay
is one to one vs two to one. The balance is one in one vs one in two. They
balance because they both equate to one.

[crackers]

-