not After opinions on my old system that fails

[Jish]

Gday everyone here is another Jish system
based on repeating numbers and all tests done with RX so here goes...

Each session is up to 35 spins long

I recruit numbers for 20 spins, once the 20th spin comes I use no more numbers

I start betting on whichever number comes up in a progression of 1,2,3,4,5,6.......25, once it reaches 25 I go no higher

So for instance:
First number is 1 so next bet is (1unit, no1)
Second number is 34 so (2units,no1)(1unit, no34)
Thrid number 14 so (3units, no1)(2unit,no34)(1unit, no14)
Fourth number 7 so (4unit, no1)(3unit, no34)(2unit, no14)(1 unit, no7)....etc etc...

Here is my last 10 sessions:
Session #---After 35 spins---bail out at
Session 1   462   1108
Session 2   -600   779
Session 3   -1000   -200
Session 4   -700   529
Session 5   -350   -350
Session 6   593   425
Session 7   -200   626
Session 8   -1100   434
Session 9   -400   600
Session 10104   104

As you notice alot of the sessions are in negative numbers after 35 spins, thats why cash out once a decent profit occurs, sometimes I have cashed out on $400 and the session ends up at +1500, With these sessions bailing out when I did the total win was $4055 out of about 60 tests ive done the losses have not exceeded the wins yet.

So there you go everyone, ive posted it here because little testing has been done on it yet, I know the bets can get particularly large, would you say its worth looking further into?

[Jish]

On further testing ive come to not a loss, well, the system it seems most of the time comes into profit, each time i chose my bail out it was around the $400+ mark, a couple of times the system has peaked at $200 where ive chosen to ignore it and it ended up $600 down by the 35th spin so perhaps i will play and withdraw after the first profit, sometimes this can be in about 8 spins and only about $50, but hey thats $50 in your pocket right?, i just like experimenting with this because it is done fast 35 spins thats it, some systems i see it takes 10,000 spins to make a decent profit

[Jish]

yep i agree! What a rubbish system. Too bad its the people like you with such negative comments that make people give up posting systems because its not worth the ridicule. Keep it up roolette soon nobody will post anything and when someone has a good idea you wont even see it.

[bombus]

Hi, Jish.

I have been looking into a similar idea recently.

I'll run through a losing session so you get the whole picture.

1 - bet 1 x 1.
----------------------

17 - bet 17 x 1.

34 – bet 17 & 34 x 1.
----------------------

22 – bet 22 x 1.

14 – bet 22 & 14 x 1.

16 - bet 22 & 14 & 16 x 1.
----------------------

11 – bet 11 x 1.

9 - bet 11 & 9 x 1.

12 - bet 11 & 9 & 12 x 1.

8 - bet 11 & 9 & 12 & 8 x 1.
---------------------

25 - bet 25 x 1.

9 - bet 25 & 9 x 1.

0 - bet 25 & 9 & 0 x 1.

32 - bet 25 & 9 & 0 & 32 x 1.

3 - bet 25 & 9 & 0 & 32 & 3 x 1.
--------------------

34 – bet 34 x 2.

13 - bet 34 & 13 x 2.

17 - bet 34 & 13 & 17 x 2.

7 - bet 34 & 13 & 17 & 7 x 2.

28 - bet 34 & 13 & 17 & 7 & 28 x 2.

0 - bet 34 & 13 & 17 & 7 & 28 & 0 x 3.
---------------------

I stop here after 21 bets and a loss of 81 units. But you could keep going through one or two more levels, ending with a final bet on 8 numbers @ the table limit for each number = big bickies.

It would go...

Next level  =  1@3, 2@3, 3@3, 4@4, 5@4, 6@5, 7@6.

Next level  = 1@8, 2@8, 3@8, 4@9, 5@10, 6@12, 7@15, 8@20.

If you could find a table limit with a better spread than 1-20 then you could push it even further, perhaps beyond 9 numbers.

I admit it is early days for this system but this is the brainstorming section and it is similar to your idea.

Any input from members is welcome.

Cheers.

[bombus]

-