Could the HOLY.G be within us all?

[MATTJONO]

Hi all,

yes,yes,yes I know I have heard it over and over again make systems the same as past systems tweeked and more tweeked waiting and more waiting for stuff to happen then betting is probably not the way to play this  game of roulette.

HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU DONE THIS.

1. After the wheel has stopped and lets say it was number 4 just spun in, you go to the board layout using guessing/instinc/syskic/random/human nature... and put 1 unit on you first choice lets say I chosen number 14 as alot of last digit numbers have been repeating. so I have my single number 14 with 1 unit on, then I go abit mad and place chips all over the show, so when I press bet comfired I have used lets say 40 units total on this bet. THEN WHAT DO I SEE when the ball has hit its pocket (randomly) number 14, yes 14 the first number I had chosen from my insticts and whats my profit from this bet NONE im down and if only I would have had faith in myself and just played this single number and lets say 1 doublestreet and 1 even chance I would of been far better off and well in profit.

2. Any of the even chances go on a very long run lets say over 12 in a row, how often do you see the 0 appear after this long run.
or when a pattern/ mirror image has appeared lets say the colums go 1,2,2,1,2,2,1,2,2,1,2,2,1,2,2, then next 0 appears. so maybe we could only suggest playing 0 when a pattern has gone 10 or more.

3. When I watch supercasino live on tele I try to use my sycic powers lol and I seem to have a good hit rate when guessing areas of the wheel I believe the ball will land. I believe I get a good hit rate on super casino because the dealers tend to play for a full hour straight and they always spin from the last number spun. and I think if im correct that they are the biggest live roulette channel as well so they will have 1,000s betting on every spins so will never ever need to cheat anyone. bad thing is that its £1 minimum bets........so hopfully be with them in the future


what im basickly going on about and would like this thread to be about is do you think we could all have the HOLY GRAIL within us beeting at the correct times because of instict/experience and judgment combined with of course disapline and money managment. this is what I believe.
I play roulette for fun and of course the rush of making money, but using the same system/statagies will only make it boring and make you use the waiting game and use progressions.

so to find a consistant winning bet maybe we will all have our own ways of betting lets forget the system rules there should be NO RULES to what you are betting just the rules for you stop and start betting at correct times and not to risk all your bankroll.


I BET ALOT OF YOU ARE STILL PUZZELD IN WHAT IM SAYING BUT IM JUST THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX SORT OF. to see other peoples experiences and views on the holy grail. i think the grail is not just one thing with set rules it can only be discoverd by yourself and at the table you are playing at that exact time and place.


CHEERS,
mattjono 

[viper5]

Good pont Mat!
but if a pesron doesn t have or develop the gift of prediction......always the randomless win win!!!!
we must all go to Thivet mounten and be prists!lol

then we will come in the world again(we will be 90 years old!) and milk the roulette!lolollololol

[MATTJONO]

Good pont Mat!
but if a pesron doesn t have or develop the gift of prediction......always the randomless win win!!!!
we must all go to Thivet mounten and be prists!lol

then we will come in the world again(we will be 90 years old!) and milk the roulette!lolollololol

nice one viper.

when I designed my first system a long time ago about 3 years ago ( long time for me as im only 20 years old ) it failed dramatickly in the end. I have learnt quit alot about what the game of roulette can do which is pritty much anything it wants.  so going with the flow /random v random/ insticts using this type of play for the next 3 years I could learn a whole lot more and maybe even try and make some ££££££££ out of my hard work.


cheers
mattjono

P.S practice makes perfect

[viper5]

My friend Mat ....u know that I like u very much...I have said that in public

But if u analise the word "Random" u will see that Random vs Random s=doesn t exists!!!!

do u know why>>?

couse Random is Random!!!!

ololololololololol

its like u fight a hole with a hole.

in the end u will win a hole!!!!!
BUT in the Roulette case that meens u will lose a lot of money!

[vito7]

  Funny you being 20, I mean when I read the post

you look more mature.

  And if you would write only the title

that would be just enough.

I mean "Could the Holy Grail be within us all"?

Appart from the fact that I dont  like the using of

the word HG for roulette, I wd say

that this is one of those classic questions

where the answer is inside.

Good point Matjono

[thor]

hi mat and viper,

i just stumbled over this and wanted post my feelings.  seems like this thread might be old but if victor or someone reads this and thinks it could be posted somewhere else more current please do so and let me know, because this is a subject close to me.

i actually believe strongly about using 'intuition' or 'precognition' or whatever you might want to call it as a form of prediction.  i believe that we all have the 'ability' and i'm sure we can all relate an experience of having a 'strong feeling' at one time or another.  i bet we actually often say to ourselves, 'i knew i should have done that'.  in all my testing of different ideas, i did touch on this as a posibility, tested it, ran in to it's weakness, then shelved it.  but like many ideas, along with its weaknesses, this one also has its usefulness.  the unique difference with this idea, unlike other systems/strategies, is that it is subject to the 'ability' of the user, so is more effective to some than to others.  also if you plain believe in this or not.

i'm not saying that this is the answer, but i believe it cannot be totally dismissed.  we are all different and there is no one road to take.  and the 'nature' of this idea makes it more difficult to explain and thus makes it more subject to controversy.  but it is my 'intuition' that there are people out there who are using this to some degree, and some are plain good at it.  but of course they would never let anyone know.  because who would believe?

good luck to all
thor

[thor]

hi viper,


i also want to say that i totally agree with you on your point about randomness.  but that is the one strength of 'intuition'.  unlike other 'forms' of prediction intuition is not affected by randomness.  it is not 'tied' to past events, but is looking toward the future.  you could close your eyes and not know or care what numbers came up before.  you place your bet on what you 'see' on the next spin, what ever that might be.

the weakness to intuition is that not everyone can use this with the same effectiveness.  and even if you can, the strength of this 'ability' is not always the same.  like many 'biological' funtions it has 'good and bad days'.  the other weakness is that you can be distracted more easily.  focus is needed, and unless you are good it makes you tired more quickly. 

good luck
thor

[thor]

-