G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[A3on47]

Just wondering if someone have been playing/testing G.U.T ( the Great Universal Theory by Winkel) recently?
It's a shame if such great discovery had just died  

Afonso

[Davey-Jones]

Usually when systems disappear it is because they tanked for everyone who played it.

[Herb6]

There was nothing unique or great about it.

It was nothing more than the gambler's fallacy.

[winkel]

Usually when systems disappear it is because they tanked for everyone who played it.

You are a global Mod?

Disregarding the most read thread?

BTW: I´m still playing and winning. I also transferred the idea to Lotto and win now 11 of 14 bets

I received a lot of PM´s and always answered that I only reply to questions which are asked publically. But nearly nobody did ask publically.

If you, Davey Jones like people like Herb Nr. 1 to ?? more than a contributor of the most read thread than I will leave if you want and I ask you to delete all my posts. then this folrum will definetly be like GG or RF.

so Good bye to all

pls delete all my posts and my account.

br
winkel

[Spike!]

There was nothing unique or great about it.

It was nothing more than the gambler's fallacy.

When Herb has car trouble, he blames it on gamblers fallacy. The term is meaningless.

[bombus]

BTW:... I also transferred the idea to Lotto and win now 11 of 14 bets

Well done Winkel. I hope you can make some serious money with that.

[A3on47]

so Good bye to all

pls delete all my posts and my account.

br
winkel

Please Winkel, it wasn't my intention to receive such kind of comments from such people like Davey Jones and Herb6.
Don't take then too serious and please reconsider staying here ...

You have made a Master Piece, you shouldn't pay attention to such rude comments 

Afonso

[Davey-Jones]

Winkel...  Glad to see your tear ducts still work.

Steve, can you take away my mod powers? That way I can tell Winkel to go F*ck himself.

[Steve]

Steve, can you take away my mod powers? That way I can tell Winkel to go F*ck himself.

Done. But if you want to tell anyone to go f**k themselves, please do it to them directly - not via the forum.

[A3on47]

Done. But if you want to tell anyone to go f**k themselves, please do it to them directly - not via the forum.

And it's all said ! 

[poxet pool]

Thanks Winkle for all of ur productive work and sharing G.U.T. to the world of roulette players.It's easy to come to the opinion that ur proof of crossovers has caused a lot of jealousy to low ranking pet shop players.Maybe because they can never devote the intellect of using math to win? or even use ur principles to avoid sleepers.I'll take Stochastic Math over gambler fallacy any day.

[Noble Savage]

Thanks Winkle for all of ur productive work and sharing G.U.T. to the world of roulette players.It's easy to come to the opinion that ur proof of crossovers has caused a lot of jealousy to low ranking pet shop players.Maybe because they can never devote the intellect of using math to win? or even use ur principles to avoid sleepers.I'll take Stochastic Math over gambler fallacy any day.

First of all there is no such thing as "Stochastic Math". (don't start quoting Winkel without some proper research in the very fields he claims to master )

"Stochastic" simply means "random". There are "Stochastic processes" (sometimes called "random processes") studied under Probability Theory. Probability Theory is "a branch of mathematics concerned with analysis of random phenomena".

There is nothing in these scientific fields (or any) that says you can predict true random outcomes better than expectancy. There is no theory/system/algorithm that accomplishes that, or even come close (otherwise, there would be no casinos, no games of chance such as the lottery, no financial markets, and we would witness huge radical advancement in many fields).

Winkel's "Great Universal Godly Holy Grail Theory" (or whatever) has nothing "great" about it. It is utter nonsense and doesn't yield any true verifiable edge to the player whatsoever. If it weren't nonsense, he'd certainly be famous by now.

[Spike!]

that says you can predict true random outcomes better than expectancy.>>

There's no math law that says you can't, there's only theory and opinion.

[Noble Savage]

There's no math law that says you can't

Yes there is, actually.

But you're an "educated guesser", of course you'll say there isn't simply because it suits your case better, even though you are completely ignorant in those fields (and actually brag about such ignorance).

[Spike!]

Yes there is, actually.

But you're an "educated guesser", of course you'll say there isn't simply because it suits your case better, even though you are completely ignorant in those fields (and actually brag about such ignorance).

Name the law. You can't.

of course you'll say there isn't>>

LOL, thats because I do this day in and day out, there CAN'T be a law! This just cracks me up, you people have no idea what you're talking about yet you think you're the experts. Its hilarious.

[Spike!]

-