G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[Bayes]

'proud to be ignorant'  

[Spike!]

'proud to be ignorant'  

Honest to god, Bayes thats exactly how I think about you. You wear your ignorance like its a medal, you even strut around, showing it off. If you only knew.... 

[Noble Savage]

Coming from you, that's a good thing!

Bayes is a most respectable poster.

[Bayes]

You wear your ignorance like its a medal, you even strut around, showing it off. If you only knew....

Apparently all the encyclopaedias, textbooks, and casinos do to.  

Not to mention the small matter that every system ever created has failed. But YOU know different. Wow.  

It is indeed a theatre of the absurd.

[Spike!]

small matter that every system ever created has failed. But YOU know different. >>>

Sigh. Good god, you don't pay attention. Systems don't work, how could they. The only thing that works is having the ability to change your strategy after every spin. This takes much practice. Duh...

[poxet pool]

Bayeby with that kind of attitude u should never be playing..and again no proof u do.

[Noble Savage]

The only thing that works is having the ability to change your strategy after every spin. This takes much practice. Duh...

[Spike!]

Once again, all the two of you have is theory, speculation, and insults. How original. You can't prove that past spins can't be used to guess the next result, all you have is assumptions based on faulty probabitilty theory. Nuff said.

I don't care that 99.9% of of the losers in the casino fall within the parameters of your theories. Whats that got to do with me.

[Bayes]

Systems don't work, how could they. The only thing that works is having the ability to change your strategy after every spin. This takes much practice. Duh...

Changing your strategy after every spin changes nothing. YAWN.

[Bayes]

You can't prove that past spins can't be used to guess the next result, all you have is assumptions based on faulty probabitilty theory. Nuff said.

Show me some evidence that probability theory is faulty. You can't. And yes, it can be proved that past spins don't change the odds.

[Spike!]

Changing your strategy after every spin changes nothing.

Actually, it changes everything. You keep up with the random outcomes the wheel is producing, something you will never do with a mechanical system.

[Spike!]

Show me some evidence that probability theory is faulty.>>

Show me the mathematicl proof that says I can't use past spins. There isn't any, just speculation.

>>it can be proved that past spins don't change the odds.>>

If I guess better than expctancy, the odds are now in my favor, and I changed nothing.

[poxet pool]

I challenged  Globall and bayeby to produce test yields to disprove G.U.T. but just got a typical lazy argument that pretty much sums up another educated guess..u two are total no yields.

[Spike!]

I challenged  Globall and bayeby to produce test yields to disprove G.U.T. but just got a typical lazy argument>>

Thats all you'll ever get. When you know everything and have others that wink and nod and agree with you and back you up, you never have to prove anything. When their argument comes down to, hey, the casinos always make money, don't they, you know they're grasping at straws. A bunch of idiots throwing their money down the drain on games they don't know how to play proves nothing.

[Bayes]

I challenged  Globall and bayeby to produce test yields to disprove G.U.T. but just got a typical lazy argument that pretty much sums up another educated guess..u two are total no yields.

And I told you Kon-Fu-Sed has already done it, are you too lazy to read? What makes you think it will win the second time around? 

[Bayes]

-