Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

matrix system (carry the topic on)

Started by darrynf, February 03, 2011, 09:17:39 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

darrynf

I would like to start of this topic as the original got banned and would like to keep talking about it as it sounded good.

I dont know whether phase2 was a scammer or not, to be honest i dont care.

waiting for the pattern to hit sounded good to me.

is anyone willing to carry this topic on.

darrynf

I was wondering if the repeat was to hit 2 out of 5 more times then it would be a winner. but how many times can you expect it to repeat the pattern.

i think it would hit just as much as it would not hit in the pattern.

did anyone get around to testing this method ?

col1879

You are always betting 1 dozen, so using units of 1, for example, means any win is+2 compared to any loss is -1, but you have 1 in 3 chance of winning, it's not 50/50

Viewing 5 spins:

Win 5 / Lose 0 = +10
Win 4 / Lose 1 = +7
Win 3 / Lose 2 = +4
Win 2 / Lose 3 = +1
Win 1 / Lose 4 = -2
Win 0 / Lose 5 = -5

Steve

No problems with carrying on. It's a free forum. Just be aware the person who created it did so to scam people. He knows it doesnt work.

darrynf

I havent done any testing on this method but it sounds like it would hit 2 out of 5 more times then not.

if we were to bet on the pattern not to repeat then we would have to win 4 out of 5 (kind of like buffs two dozen bets).

either the pattern will repeat or it wont, or it will some, to keep it self balance over the long term.
if we presumed it would work would you use a progression to counter losses and what sort of progression.

If someone could get some real numbers then i could show how it might look.

opikos

Why the thread got banned???? I wake up this morning and its GONE, what was the SCAM about it?

darrynf


darrynf

Session
1   L
14   M
4   L
26   H
36   H,
1   L   WIN+2
1   L   LOSS
20   M   LOSS
30   H   WIN+2
0   ,   LOSS
11   L   WIN+2
3   L   WIN+2
25   H   LOSS
31   H   WIN +2
35   H,   NO BET
14   M   LOSS
10   L   WIN+2
24   M   LOSS
35   H   WIN +2
8   L,   LOSS
36   H   LOSS
36   H   LOSS
9   L   LOSS
22   M   LOSS
27   H,   LOSS
3   L   LOSS
31   H   WIN+2
13   M   LOSS
34   H   LOSS
9   L,   LOSS
30   H   LOSS
31   H   WIN+2
17   M   WIN+2
15   M   LOSS
23   M,   LOSS
26   H   WIN+2
17   M   LOSS
7   L   LOSS
28   H   LOSS
4   L,   LOSS
12   L   LOSS
2   L   LOSS
15   M   LOSS
10   L   LOSS
25   H,   LOSS
24   M   LOSS
26   H   LOSS
12   L   LOSS
9    L   WIN+2
36   H,   WIN+2
5   L   LOSS
24   M   LOSS
24   M   LOSS
12   L   WIN+2
20   M,   LOSS
10   L   WIN+2
1   L   LOSS
1    L   LOSS
13    M   LOSS
29   H,   LOSS
8   L   WIN+2
14   M   LOSS
24   M   LOSS
8   L   LOSS
20   M,   LOSS
15   M   LOSS
11   L   LOSS
31   H   LOSS
16   M   LOSS
6   L,   LOSS
10   L   LOSS
2   L   WIN+2
4   L   LOSS
1   L   LOSS
0   ,   LOSS
2   L   WIN+2
1   L   WIN+2
33   H   LOSS
6   L   WIN+2
35   H,   NO BET
8   L   WIN+2
8   L   WIN+2
7   L   LOSS
34   H   LOSS
17   M,   LOSS
21   M   LOSS
30   H   LOSS
25   H   LOSS
28   H   WIN+2
2   L,   LOSS
3   L   LOSS
35   H   WIN+2
36   H   WIN+2
25   H   WIN+2
26   H,   LOSS
12   L   LOSS
7   L   LOSS
11   L   LOSS
27   H   WIN+2
1   L,   LOSS
13   M   LOSS
12   L   WIN+2
0      LOSS
104 spins

28 WINS (56 UNITS)
68 LOSES (-12 UNITS)
12 LONGEST LOSES IN A ROW, NO PROGRESSION USED.

I dont know how the stakes would of affected it but going by this it did not do that well (with out some typ of progression used.
so out of 99 spins it has 28 wins with a strike rate of around 27%.

Im not sure if this is a good session or a bad session, any comments from anyone ?

atlantis

Quote from: darrynf on February 03, 2011, 09:17:39 PM
I would like to start of this topic as the original got banned and would like to keep talking about it as it sounded good.

I dont know whether phase2 was a scammer or not, to be honest I dont care.

waiting for the pattern to hit sounded good to me.

is anyone willing to carry this topic on.

Can someone tell me why the MATRIX--50 thread has been removed?
As far as I know there was no reason to delete it. Anyhow I, for one,would like it reinstated.


A.


buffalowizard

Hi darryn,

27% would be just under one 3rd which is almost exactly as expected for betting 1:2 dozens.

I have looked at something similar which I am currently testing based on this.

Basically follow 3 dozens

HLL

Then bet as before for a repeat

You often get a repeat, if not then follow the last

So:

H L L

L M H   Loss at 1 unit. Go for repeat of this pattern, still at 1 unit for recovery.

H H L   Loss at 1 unit. Now raise to 2 units

Raise to 4 units if lost this one

Like i said i will be testing but looking good with early checks

BW

buffalowizard

Atlantic

Steve deleted it all as PHASE2 was the scammer charles H

Buffalo

atlantis

Quote from: buffalowizard on February 04, 2011, 06:15:38 AM
Atlantis

Steve deleted it all as PHASE2 was the scammer charles H

Buffalo

Well I do not believe that - but possibly it was fender1000. Anyhow the topic is resurrected at the other forum and I hope PHASE2 will join in there and continue.

Thanks,
A.

darrynf

atlantis, did you understand the staking of this method ?

darrynf



buffalowizard

-