@ Mr Chips

[potatochips]

Hi there,

What system among your arsenal do you like to play the most ? and which one is the most profitable ?

[Mr Chips]

I don't really have a preference for any particular system although the most difficult and has to be the most complex system on the planet
I call my Flagship system EC Black and Red. A spin off from that system is Signum where I have produced results in the 'Chips section'. I am
in the process of trying to explain the system, so it can be easily understood, but it is proving more difficult than creating the system in the
first place lol.
 
I have devoted a great many years to designing systems and I still get ideas all the time, so I just jot down the idea and place it with the
literally thousands of sheets of paper I have accumulated over the years. With a very complex system it may take 3 or 6 months before I
can find a small solution to a part of the system then that has to be tested then perhaps another 3 or 6 months to find another piece of
the puzzle and so on. It is probably for this reason that when I try to explain a complex system e.g 4Selecta most people find it difficult
to understand and give up after a short attempt.
 
The systems I have mentioned above are profitable in the long term and there will be people here who say that is impossible because of the
house edge etc. Also certain people say it's just luck. No one can have years of luck with different types of systems it makes no sense.

I hope I will be forgiven for mentioning the proposed New Forum, but that will be financed from the 4Selecta and Signum systems, I would
say that is proof enough for anyone to see.
 
Mr Chips

[potatochips]

I think I understand most of your comment above. I can read between lines that you have devoted a lot of time and in a systematic way to this gargantuesque task of creating a set of strategies to skew the odds in your favor. I think you are the first person to show that profiting from the wheel is a serious possibility. You have shown plenty of evidences it was possible and I think for this alone, it's worth mentionning. I also think you deserve a big thank you for sharing your time, energy, and talents.



I have another question if you don't mind I'd like to discuss with you, apart from the technical education one needs to get, what other aspect(s) do you think a player needs to develop in order to win? In other words, do you think winning can be reduced to the application of just a simple technique or is it more than that ?

[Mr Chips]

When I started working on roulette systems I designed them to give me an advantage. At that time there were no roulette forums
no 'no sayers' or maths people to say this or that is impossible. I gradually pieced together a system stage by stage using countless
sheets of paper, countless visits to casino's to see if a system would work. Sometimes placing small bets, which concentrates the
mind and on occasions produces ideas. Gradually a viable system develops and then comes endless testing on paper and visits to
casino's
 
I am certain that not many people would put so much time and effort into developing such systems, but it is my fascination and
interest. My way of working on my type of system does produce a certain state of mind. For example I am never upset or down
if I lose a session. I expect to lose a certain number of sessions, but I will expect them to be minimum losses. I will often say to
myself "that was a good loss". Now that may seem a crazy thing to say and no one in their right mind is going to even think such
an absurdity. When I weigh up all the info from a session and it points to a probable loss, then I will be happy to exit a session, with
a minimum loss, as I know over a number of sessions I will win more than I lose, so losing sessions are no problem.
 
There will also be many occasions when lets say I have reached roughly 80 or 90 per cent of a usual session and may be a couple
of wins in the session, but there are few positive signs at that stage then I will most probably exit the session perhaps +5 or -7
which in effect is a break even result. I would never force a win and incorrectly think there could well be a great win in the next
couple of spins. I make a decision to exit and move on.
 
There is the view I am sure held by most people here that if your on a roll get as much out of it as possible. This view is not relevant
in my type of complex system. I expect to make a certain number of units per session over a certain period of time and I know, if I
keep to the requirements of the particular system, then the number of units will continue in perpetuity.
 
Mr Chips

[potatochips]

What's your take regarding geometric or negative progressions? Do you use some sort of progression in your strategies?

[Mr Chips]

When playing EC always flat betting.

For numbers I will add an additional unit when the numbers hit up to a maximum of 5 units. Never a blanket increase on all numbers.
 
I am not in favour of progressions, as it's like a dark tunnel and your not guaranteed to see a light at the end of it.
 
The exception would be if there was say a 25 million to one chance that a Dozen would not come in by spin 18. The Oops website
shows some interesting statistics where for example Dozens can sleep for over 40 spins. I have an ongoing project to try and get
to that spin 18 goal and if I am lucky and can devote enough time to it, plus finding someone to program it, then it may become a
reality sometime next year.
 
Mr Chips

[Mr Chips]

-