Hello guys,
During the last months i tryed to create my own bet selection method to bet on 2 dozens.
At the same time i looking for how to addapt LW registry to this method.
In my tests all going from bad to worse :) -my method doesnt seems to be good enough.
But yesterday ,i did a test from Hamburg 620 actuals and there are the results
zerro-16
L-233
W-371
If i will bet each spin 2 units covering 2 dozens i will win 371 units and lost 498 units.
So ,its seems using my selection isnt the right way .
After this i checked the result using LW-flat bet.The results are:
Lw- 42 loss,78 wins -6 units
LLw- 17 loss,21 wins -13 units
Lww- 24 loss,79 wins +31 units
So using these 3 patterns we will be on +12 units
I like the idea to use more than one patern ,coz in my early tests ,some perform good ,some not and using all of them we stay protected from big drawdowns.
After this i continued to look in this registry ,trying to find another good performing pattern.
And the next is very interesting.
I deceide to start hunting for L`s
I devide all 620 spins on 614 groups.Each group content 7 spins.Most of the cases an L occure in this 7spins gruops.In fact only in 20 groups there arent L`s .In all other 594 groups there are minimum one L.
this impressed me a lot -96.7% from the cases an L occure in my selection.
I did a quick test -to bet after 3w using progression 1-1-2-3 and to bet after 4w using the same progression.
-7 units on L,and +1 or 2 units om W
the results are :
after 3W +50 units
after 4W +37 units
Guys pls pay attention on my idea .I thing there is something .All the times i learned from you .all that i know about roulette is from this amazing forum .
I preffer to use flat bets ,but using soft progression like 1-1-2-3 is not too scary and performs well when needs to recover.
And i know too ,that 600 spins is not enought .Thats why i share my idea with you .If you can check this idea in your spins data ,will be good.
Please excuise me about my english .i hope that you`ll understand what i mean :)
Best regards
SpensX
With all due respect you can not flat bet using two dozens it is not economically practical. You could use one dozen with some success but not two. I have tried this many times and only comes out on the negative. Even if you could make it work you would have very little return for the amount of hours invested.
While playing the VlS Lw Methodology I did show a profit flat betting the columns and dozens.
It can be done by watching for positive trends.
Sam
Thanks for your contribution Spens.
Hunting for L's is a very nice way to profit as they pay more than w's AND they have a tendency to clump together nicely too after a lot of w's have been spinning when LL or LwL appear, you may want to hook into that stream.
Use a soft positive progression and you are on your way. Concentration of hits will eventually hit you, and you can be able to end up in profit losing a recoupable amount.
Good on you for bringing this topic on!
Cheers.
Hello again ,
I continued my test beting after wins
The results after 1100 actuals from Hamburg are:
Bet on L with prog. 1-1-2-3
after 3W +75 units
after 4W +31 units
after 5W +21 units
its seems thats the most common pattern is 3-4-5 W in a row . I have to tell you that i do not bet on JD or LD,i make my own selection and i`ll share with you guys this in Bet selection section
QuoteI make my own selection and I`ll share with you guys this in Bet selection section
Looking forward to reading it dear Spens.
Christmas present for the forum! [smiley=Santa001.gif]
QuoteI continued my test beting after wins
The results after 1100 actuals from Hamburg are:
Bet on L with prog. 1-1-2-3
after 3W +75 units
after 4W +31 units
after 5W +21 units
Hi SpensX- let me clarify what I meant on my above previous response: yes you can win betting flat on this system but the amount of time spent on what you make is not worth it, at least not to me. And if you lose 3 times in a row you will have to win 9 times in order to recoup your loses and show a $1 profit. I don't know about you but that is a lot of time on a live table for small profit. Don't get me wrong I am testing this system exclusively right now and it has some excellent potential. I am using different variations of the L's and W's with good returns. After further testing I will also share my results, regards Marv