The Lurchy Same/Opposite System

[TwoCatSam]

HamBone

Thanks for that, Bro. 

Until later.......

SamBone

[hamsup_sotong]

oops i stand corrected its from 25 spins not 15 :p

Here is how i played


[table=,]

numbers,   B,   W,   W-B,  OVERALL   
               
,      ,   ,   ,   ,
30,      ,   ,   ,   ,
35,      2,   36,   34,   34
36,      2,   ,   -2,   32
34,      4,   ,   -4,   28
25,      6,   ,   -6,   22
17,      8,   ,   -8,   14
36,      10,   36,   26,   40
13,      2,   ,   -2,   38
0,      4,   ,   -4,   34
1,      6,   ,   -6,   28
26,      8,   ,   -8,   20
30,      10,   ,   -10,   10
2,      24,   ,   -24,   -14
12,      42,   ,   -42,   -56
12,      ,   ,   0,   -56
3,      4,   ,   -4,   -60
1,      8,   ,   -8,   -68
7,      12,   ,   -12,   -80
2,      16,   ,   -16,   -96
14,      20,   72,   52,   -44
0,      6,   ,   -6,   -50
3,      12,   ,   -12,   -62
16,      18,   ,   -18,   -80
3,      24,   108,   84,   4
3,      8,   144,   136,   140

[/table]

Hammy

[hamsup_sotong]

Sambone

Anytime mate . Reckon you should give a whack at this. With a few more tweaks i think this can(HOPE!!) be a winner.

HamBone

[TwoCatSam]

I say, ol' Bean

I shall forthwith put this on my "to whack" list.  As of now, I am bogged down with other studies.  Told my wife I wanted to hire a secretary.  Did not bode well, for sure!

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

hammy

Hope you don't find this offensive but I checked your numbers.  Perfect!

Thanks for the test!

This system is officially on my "whack" list.

Sam

And, yes, I'm greedy!!  I want to corner the market on "Holy Grails". 

Then I'll bail out my two good buddies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac!

God Save the U.S.A!

Sam

[hamsup_sotong]

Sam

Lol .... maybe its time to bring your wife into the fray!!! i would i could .... but my gf would " skin me alive"!!!

edit : pork doesnt taste as good without any fat :p


Testing results for today @ dubby ... slightly long session. Result still good.

   
[table=,]   
   
Date,    test,  sp,  Win/Lose,  Overall,

12/9/2008,  28,  51,  110,  1356,


[/table]   

Ham

[hamsup_sotong]

latest test result

[table=,]   
   
Date, Test, Spins, Win/Lose, Overall   

12/9/2008,29,39,102,1458,

[/table]

Ham

[TwoCatSam]

Well, I have to say, hammy, this is quite impressive!  Something that goes this far with a profit is worth many looks by many people!

I plan to test this and the G.U.T. as soon as I finish the others.  Can't wait to duplicate your excellent results.

Sam

[hamsup_sotong]

Sam

Hopefully more of the same will continue( and good luck to you as well).

However, i do feel that further tweaks may be needed, like when to start playing for example. While its been said that the "wheel has no memory", i still feel that there's no pt in entering play on a "bad" run of numbers on view (Maybe its just me). Further testing is needed and perhaps more people involved as well, as my results may be just luck.

Cheers and Happy testing folks
Ham

[TwoCatSam]

ham

I was going to test it coupled with my theory of repeaters.  Here's how it would go.  On the marquee you must have two of the same number within five spins of each other.

32
32

32
x
32

32
x
x
32

32
x
x
x
32

And this is only valid as long as the bottom 32 is still number 10 or smaller.  When it's 11 or off the board, no bet.  I find that when this happens there will be many more repeaters; not always, just sometimes.  I was going to wait until a repeater occurred and then start betting until the oldest repeater was #10.  Bear in mind that a new set of repeaters after 32 keeps it alive.

1............First half of repeater couplet.......
24
36
1.........repeats are bettable until the previous 1 becomes in the 10 slot or leaves the 10 number marquee. You bet the repeater (1) to repeat also.
x
x
x
32.......still valid; only in the number 9 socket.  Would also be valid for one more spin as it's good through number 10.

Wish someone would try this with the lurchy/opposite sysem

Sam
[attachimg=#]

In this example, the first 35 is in the eleven slot, so the 35s are dead.  Three or four spins ago they predicted the 2 and 4.  Now the 2 couplet in the lead is the trigger for more repeaters.

Later on, you see this trot:
11........oldest
12
26
11.....repeater  Begin betting numbers coming after this 11, plus the 11 itself.
19
21
32
14
6
21.....repeater of the earlier 21.  Also starts new group of repeaters as the 21s had no more than 3 fall between them
34....this 34 pushes our first 11 into the ten hole and kills that run.
3
1
32.......not a repeater.  Too many numbers between it and the previous 32.
32...repeater that starts the sequence over again.  Bet this 32 and all numbers after and all still valid from the 21....21, 34, 3 and 1.
21
19
5
6
30
21......repeater but no triger
19.....same
2


When these repeaters start coming, they can go for an hour.  Then they will stop for a long time; no repeaters within the last five spins.

Been watching this since early 07.

Sam

[hamsup_sotong]

Sam

What's the betting scheme like? flat bets? progression on a loss?

Ham

[TwoCatSam]

What I was thinking was this:  When you have a trigger: 32xx32.....You bet the 32 and his opposite.  Say 18 comes.  You bet 18 and his opposite.  You will do this as long as the oldest of the repeaters couplet is in the ten slot or less.  Eleven is out of bounds, unless a new trigger has formed.  Very possible!

You may have as many as nine bets or as few as five, depending on where and how the couplet of repeaters formed.  Example:

32......He just came.
32......He is in the 2 slot on the marquee.

The oldest 32 will keep the couplet alive through the tenth position on the marquee.

34...He just came
12
21
11
34...He is oldest part of couplet of repeaters.  He is in the fifth slot  You may bet until he is in the 11 position down on the marquee. When he is in the tenth, you still bet. 

Some marquees are only ten numbers long:  CasinoWebCam and others.  I think Bet365 is, too.  Microgaming's wheel has twelve showing so I am honed in on the eleventh position as my killer.

But.........if you're getting the good results over and over......tweaks my be counter-productive!  Just tuck this idea away and keep it as a possible tweak.

Sam

[hamsup_sotong]

mm k ... i'll have a look at it ... maybe run a secondary table in addition just to seee how it pans out

ham

[TwoCatSam]

hammy

Good idea.  Don't change your primary study.  Use this as a secondary!  I'd love to see the results.

Sam

[hamsup_sotong]

Latest result

[table=,]   
   
Date, Test, Spins, Win/Lose, Overall   

13/9/2008,30,29,114,1572
   
[/table]   
   
Edit: Sam, its hard to run the a concurrent secondary table as most of the time i exit pretty quickly :p. It'll be hard to have a good grasp of the br needed as well as exit pts. Maybe a new thread is needed as its probably easier with more people involved.

On a lighter note, the streak is ongoing!!! 

Cheers
Ham

[hamsup_sotong]

-