The Gizmotron Black Box Validator - A sneak peek

[gizmotron]

Gizmo,

I tested 6 sessions of past real spins from the casino that I play at.  American 0/00 Wheel.  Bad results for me.  
(126 Spins -260.)  (56 Spins -140.)  (64 Spins -300.)  (93 spins -100.)  (79 Spins -200.)  (112 Spins -130.)

Could be a case of really bad luck.  I'll be testing it some more.  I wanted to let you know that I appreciate your efforts.  Thanks.

VKM

That's what I've been waiting for. Could you publish those spins in comma delimited formats. Those long line delimited formats are boring. Thanks

[Kelly]

No im not happy, it would have been great  if it worked.  Personally i don`t give much credit to a 3 day test, in this case around 500 spins,  because mathematicly it could have been a bad streak.

But compared to what you say it/you can do, it failed miserably.  To be honest, most 2 doz/columns play usually fails big time for some reason. We testet one of Izak Miziayay (Letstalkwinner) systems and it really had a hard time getting in profits most of the time.

[gizmotron]

You didn't play long enough for each session. Unless you're using a progression, these results wouldn't be consistent.

Warning, forum difficulties. Cheese has nothing to do with this software and his comments are speculative based on personal conflict bias and personality dysfunction. He has no idea what is needed to make this improve. He just loves to disrupt and wreck discussion threads. It's mostly an attention issue. So be polite please but don't encourage him.

[VKM]

You didn't play long enough for each session. Unless you're using a progression, these results wouldn't be consistent.

Cheese,

Each of those 6 sessions were the length shown.  They are what they are.


VKM

 

[VKM]

That's what I've been waiting for. Could you publish those spins in comma delimited formats. Those long line delimited formats are boring. Thanks

I'm not familiar with the term "comma delimited format".  Would an example be 1,2,3,4,etc.?


VKM

[cheese]

  To be honest, most 2 doz/columns play usually fails big time for some reason. We testet one of Izak Miziayay (Letstalkwinner) systems and it really had a hard time getting in profits most of the time.

Yes, I never play any bet selection where the bet is less than the return. You're just asking for trouble. Even with a good bet selection, you can get in over you're head very quickly. If you're using a progression, you're done before you even begin.

[gizmotron]

If what we are seeing is example of clustered losing streaks then that is great. That is what I was hoping for. Cheese is clueless on this . He thinks his shit does not stink because of this failing. Only he is about as cool as any mathboyz or Snowman himself. I really don't care to discuss this. I've been excited that some here have done work and validation for me. It's all good. So I will go back to work on this and set a few more intelligent layers to it. Thanks, I took a break, got a much needed blast from my favorite libation and watched as a few people saw the  green fairy as I have all along.

[gizmotron]

I'm not familiar with the term "comma delimited format".  Would an example be 1,2,3,4,etc.?


VKM

Yes, that's perfect. It's just commas and spins, no space bars. (empty space)

[cheese]

I've been excited that some here have done work and validation for me. It's all good. So I will go back to work on this and set a few more intelligent layers to it.

Thats a good idea. You said the proof demo worked out great too, you said you were pleased with the outcome. The outcomes from this contraption must have you overjoyed. I know they tickle me.... These results saved me the time and trouble fiddling with it myself. Thanks, everybody.

[VKM]

Gizmo,

The 6 sessions that I tested.

Session 1
21,24,2,31,17,18,12,19,12,12,35,26,13,11,32,23,4,25,7,2,23,27,24,30,9,16,17,36,34,24,29,3,33,3,10,21,27,2,21,30,28,8,11,9,3,19,10,33,4,18,20,11,3,11,11,17,5,31,21,2,22,32,21,15,00,20,31,0,5,25,8,0,36,36,25,23,30,3,15,19,34,9,17,17,29,2,20,23,26,1,31,36,23,19,0,6,23,24,21,24,36,25,13,29,35,24,10,1,35,30,9,00,24,7,0,35,00,12,0,34,18,31,
26,30,10,36

Session 2
25,2,3,25,13,11,12,17,23,20,25,6,21,19,8,18,5,21,22,31,15,19,00,12,23,00,15,30,29,15,33,30,0,29,25,11,29,6,25,
15,28,17,16,26,23,24,2,6,28,17,28,3,13,2,0,27

Session 3
6,9,29,18,18,9,10,16,33,15,25,13,16,32,21,9,25,8,3,00,33,22,13,35,22,23,5,23,30,8,27,34,5,16,00,5,17,9,5,27,7,30,33,0,28,36,24,28,36,16,4,1,33,19,1,7,24,36,27,36,31,33,25,2

Session 4
1,3,36,24,29,26,13,28,4,32,35,25,24,31,16,21,14,14,26,10,25,30,5,1,22,12,17,15,25,11,18,31,00,15,23,24,31,4,34,25,32,7,1,00,13,28,28,19,00,17,36,2,16,9,3,18,28,32,00,17,13,8,8,00,30,29,7,31,23,33,27,12,16,32,17,1,31,00,34,
14,21,20,31,20,18,19,0,19,1,16,14

Session 5
24,31,15,13,36,9,14,00,25,36,36,27,15,7,00,14,35,29,00,6,17,8,34,28,28,11,33,10,16,22,15,6,19,36,2,33,27,18,14,6,8,2,20,19,24,23,9,1,27,9,5,7,26,33,32,31,21,12,27,19,10,22,5,13,22,27,2,21,6,7,20,26

Session 6
3,24,2,5,20,34,15,34,00,30,7,33,19,20,10,9,29,30,6,29,2,26,1,18,0,22,27,19,26,31,34,18,2,8,32,19,25,12,33,15,20,
33,17,32,29,1,16,29,2,29,20,18,34,19,24,00,21,21,28,29,18,24,21,24,16,34,00,24,13,29,25,23,28,29,35,32,33,0,
22,1,9,24,7,3,21,21,21,17,3,6,28,35,5,32,32,29,7,1,8,14,29,18,3,17,18,26,15,30,16,4,3,35



VKM


By the way that's not how I typed the numbers in.  They are in the right order but I didn't type them in the long rows.

[gizmotron]

Thats a good idea. You said the proof demo worked out great too, you said you were pleased with the outcome. The outcomes from this contraption must have you overjoyed. I know they tickle me.... These results saved me the time and trouble fiddling with it myself. Thanks, everybody.

Yes, that fits you perfectly. You are attracted to six straight losses in a row. It's almost like a moth to a flame for you. Remember, you think your perfection has no downside to it. You are Father Roulette, the Zen master that deserves admiration. You are far too animated for any typical cartoon character. You are Super Spike. What a small contribution you actually offer to anyone. I earned the right to show what I know, You earned the right to be nothing. All you do is kill threads.

[cheese]

Yes, that fits you perfectly. You are attracted to six straight losses in a row.

You said you were pleased at that outcome, go and read it. So are you pleased or aren't you, make up your mind. I'm pleased by it and this contraption outcome, I'm very easy to please.

[gizmotron]

Gizmo,

The 6 sessions that I tested.

Thank you for all this work. It's invaluable to me. Imagine that, six huge losses in a row. It's like a perfect storm. I could have played hundreds of sessions to find this sequence of events.

[gizmotron]

You said you were pleased at that outcome, go and read it. So are you pleased or aren't you, make up your mind. I'm pleased by it and this contraption outcome, I'm very easy to please.

Thread Killer!

======================================================
This is an untested Beta. It might have bugs. It has never locked up. There are no memory leaks. Please report feature requests. It's intentionally minimal.

nolinks://home.earthlink.net/~gizmotron/getbetaGBB.exe

This is a self extracting archive. It contains a simple installation program. It will place a shortcut icon on your desktop. It comes with an un-installer in your programs folder.

[cheese]

Thank you for all this work. It's invaluable to me. Imagine that, six huge losses in a row. It's like a perfect storm. I could have played hundreds of sessions to find this sequence of events.

HUH? Losing six short sessions is well within the bounderies of probability, its not unusual in the least. Losing 15 in a row, that would be pushing it. Winning six in a row is just as likely.

[cheese]

-