Professional Roulette Playing Method & System

[gizmotron]

Will the " students  " then step forward and give  testimonials as it is  usually done in those cases ?

Nathan Detroit

I doubt if they will. Some of them have asked to not be identified. So I have chosen never to name them and to keep their identities secret from each other. If they come forward I'm sure they will be hounded to give up what they paid to learn. The point is to keep it to a few people. If I get to ten students that keep it secret then that will disprove the notion that it will be widely known. People that have something worth it to them will keep it to themselves.

[Spike!]

If they come forward I'm sure they will be hounded to give up what they paid to learn>>>

LOL! You might not have noticed, but interest in what you're doing is almost nonexistant. Nobody believes you win, nobody believes you have students. Deal with it..

[gizmotron]

If they come forward I'm sure they will be hounded to give up what they paid to learn>>>

LOL! You might not have noticed, but interest in what you're doing is almost nonexistant. Nobody believes you win, nobody believes you have students. Deal with it..

You must be nobody. Deal with that.

I'm fine with this. No shills saying how wonderful it is. Just a few people learning what I know. And it's all real. There are no math freaks telling the world how things are. In fact, there's no back stabbing You to deal with. What happens between me and those I have taught is between us. This does not include you and your wheelbarrow full of manure. Deal with that.  

[Jakkalsdraai]

Really? we know that Gizmo's method is based on "reading" random sequences such that he can do better than expectation. Any rational person has to be mighty sceptical of this claim (aren't you?). We know that he has "form" on this forum for jerking people around just for fun (apparently). Also, he's been temporarily banned on more than one occasion for his aggressiveness towards other members.

And all that is quite apart from the fact that roulette is "conventionally" recognized to be an unbeatable game, that no winning system has ever been demonstrated, that the vast majority of system sellers are charlatans... shall I go on?

Yep, we know jack.  

I fookin hope so! Been around here for sometime!   

[gizmotron]

Really? we know that Gizmo's method is based on "reading" random sequences such that he can do better than expectation. Any rational person has to be mighty sceptical of this claim (aren't you?). We know that he has "form" on this forum for jerking people around just for fun (apparently). Also, he's been temporarily banned on more than one occasion for his aggressiveness towards other members.

And all that is quite apart from the fact that roulette is "conventionally" recognized to be an unbeatable game, that no winning system has ever been demonstrated, that the vast majority of system sellers are charlatans... shall I go on?

Yep, we know jack.  

I fookin hope so! Been around here for sometime!  

Just because you guys can't conceive of a winning strategy inside the bounds of variance of a negative expectation game does not mean you are always right. You just think in the long run you are always right. That's one place where you are wrong though. You can't even figure out how to win when the odds are in your favor to win. It's fun to watch you hold mathematical court though, the grand inquisitor and your henchmen full of hunchbacks.

[Mr J]

"It's fun to watch you hold mathematical court though" >>> PERFECT! I have to use this one in the future, I love it and its VERY true.  Ken

[Spike!]

Just a few people learning what I know. >>>

Which should take about 2 hours, with a half hour coffee break thrown in. You're counting on none of them coming forward to testify (if they even exist) but they will, as soon as they start to lose. Count on it..

[gizmotron]

Only three slots left for being a student. After 10 students this offer will be removed.

Thanks

[Jean-Claud]

But what are u gonna teach?

U admited in the GG that U never had a winning method! and that all this time u were just trying to convince Spike to give u his method!

[gizmotron]

But what are u gonna teach?

U admited in the GG that U never had a winning method! and that all this time u were just trying to convince Spike to give u his method!

This is good, now you believe Spike. Spike is a lier, he knows what I'm doing is a threat to his way of gambling for one reason. He always says to never wise up the suckers. I'm wising up a handful of serious people that have taken a chance that what I claim just might be true. That however does not have to stop you from being Spike's little errand boy. U R A P isle uv T heard 's AnnD C ouch Hips. Why the heck can't you type like a normal person? Jeez.

[Spike!]

Spike is a lier, he knows what I'm doing is a threat to his way of gambling for one reason.>>

The polar opposite is true. I do know what you teach and its absolutlely not what I do, what you do doesn't work. When the s**t hits the fan over this, I want it understood by everybody that I had nothing to do with it.

[gizmotron]

In two hours yesterday I started out with four stacks of red chips, I lost the first bet, and then I ran into an EC that held up for 15 spins. That went right into two different dominances that I built up to nine stacks of reds at which point I walked. Every bit of that was based on randomness and knowing how to win with it.

So who is talking to you Spike? Which one of my students is telling you what I teach? Go ahead and email me with my teaching method. Prove it to me. You are just a lier. I never told you. You can only guess, just like you are trying to impress people with now. And here is a very important point. If you don't do what I do then you are an idiot and you don't know how to read randomness. You have no idea what you are doing according to your own admission. So buzz off stupid. You are nothing but a turkey.

[Spike!]

In two hours yesterday I started out with four stacks of red chips, I lost the first bet, and then I ran into an EC that held up for 15 spins. >>

WOW! That sure proves it to me. Gimmee a break, talk is cheap, everybody here is a winner, just ask them..

[gizmotron]

In two hours yesterday I started out with four stacks of red chips, I lost the first bet, and then I ran into an EC that held up for 15 spins. >>

WOW! That sure proves it to me. Gimmee a break, talk is cheap, everybody here is a winner, just ask them..

You are the one with the biggest blabber mouth. Just keep diggin, that hole will look good to you after a while.

[NS]

Gimmee a break, talk is cheap, everybody here is a winner, just ask them..

No s**t! That applies to you more than anyone else, except that you're a conman too.

FYI, the owner of this forum is also selling his roulette method, are you saying that he's a liar too? Oh wait, you can't bash him too, you need your vls account.

Let me tell you why Spike turned completely against Gizmo: He doesn't want people's beliefs about his con's "secret method" affected in any way in case Gizmo's system is proven to fail. That's it. Just simply protecting his con.

Notice how he keeps saying:

its absolutlely not what I do, what you do doesn't work. When the s**t hits the fan over this, I want it understood by everybody that I had nothing to do with it.

lol, why does he need it so bad to make sure people know that this has nothing to do with his "secret method", and that his method DOES work? Because what people believe about his method is the most important thing in his con.

If you're thinking "But he never showed any proof, how could anyone believe in this secret method of his anyway?". Let me tell you that there was a poll made by Bombus about a year ago about who believes in Spike's secret method, you'd be surprised how many people believed it's real or seriously suspected that it's real, over half the voters as far as I can remember.

Just keep diggin, that hole will look good to you after a while.

lol, well said.

[NS]

-