VLS Roulette Forum

Main => Full Roulette Systems => Topic started by: Mr J on August 15, 2009, 04:23:25 PM

Title: 3 years and STILL a decent method.
Post by: Mr J on August 15, 2009, 04:23:25 PM
I still like/use this one almost better than eating pizza! lol I bet on ONE split using a progression. 1-55, $2,770 on a loss. Its random, so I dont need to hear about "gamblers fallacy" which I LOVE using anyways!!! Thank God for gamblers fallacy. Anyways, (starting off with nothing crossed off) we pick ANY UNHIT split to bet on. Do NOT base it on anything please. Ok we lost, cross off the number that hit.

IMPORTANT >> we now skip the next TWO spins, no betting but cross off what hit. So its bet on one spin, skip the next two etc. We are basically betting on a unhit split, easy as pizza pie. Instead of going to 55 on our progression, it stretches to a MAX. of 165. In most cases it'll be around 130. A couple notes: Lets say the 33 & 35 are crossed off. You must also cross off the 36. Cross any number off if you can not bet on a UNHIT split !! Also, lets say the 28 29 30 31 & 33 are crossed off.
The 35 hits, you must now also cross off the 32 34 & 36 as well. Near the end you might get into one of two "situations". If you only have ONE unhit split left, no more skipping, bet every spin. Another tough example..... Lets say the only numbers left unhit are the 14 16 17 18 & 20.
The 17 is the key number for all four splits. We can no longer skip spins. Why? If that 17 hit while skipping, we would be screwed. So, every spin must be bet but we alternate, do not stick to one of the splits.
Maybe bet like this.....17/14 then 17/18 then 17/20 then 17/16. Whatever order you want but remember to cross something off if it hits!! After a win, start over fresh. I have played this around 18 times (live of course). Lost once, I did get four wins between the 45-55 stages. Questions?  Ken
Title: Re: 3 years and STILL a decent method.
Post by: Mr J on August 15, 2009, 05:36:27 PM
Thats how I roll.  :diablo:
Title: Re: 3 years and STILL a decent method.
Post by: Mr J on August 15, 2009, 05:52:25 PM
"Perfect"? Far from it but I try hard.  Ken
Title: Re: 3 years and STILL a decent method.
Post by: DOC on September 02, 2009, 07:07:14 PM
Just a thought have you ever worked out (on average) which spin you win on.  For exampel if you generally never win on the 1st 10 bets, then only start your betting there which whould lowver the progression amount.