A friend of mine sent me this (<spam removed>. com), and I'm not the most mathematically inclined person out there, but. . . it seems to be working right now.
I went in with a $50 bank roll out of curiosity and boredom, and I've made about $100 now.
Can anyone explain to me how this strategy works? It has a chart for the bets, but why are they like that?
I'm afraid RouletteIsNOTeasy, and you have just learned the oldest and most dangerous system in the book. My advice is to take your profits and beat a hasty retreat. :ok:
a lot of newbies in town..lol
Quote from: Jean-Claud link=topic=16713. msg116670#msg116670 date=1280516933
a lot of newbies in town. . lol
are you the only expert?
Whats so dangerous about it? I've used that strategy before, and it HAS worked.
And what makes you the expert? haha
Never claimed to be an expert. . . ?
in fact, I'm quite the opposite. I'll fully admit to being a newbie.
but yes, what exactly makes it dangerous?
Yes I am 1 of the experts in all the sides of Roulette.
a)maths-probability
2)physics
My liitle newby friend this system that u posted is the oldest LOSER of all....this and the Martignale are same OLD STEADY HUGE LOSERS....
If u really like Roulette just read ALL the posts in this forum...You will be in a good level then.
Quote from: Jean-Claud link=topic=16713. msg116722#msg116722 date=1280535285
Yes I am 1 of the experts in all the sides of Roulette.
a)maths-probability
2)physics
how about dellusion?
all i see is arrogance that is backed up by more arrogance. i think spike is right about you.
Jean-Claud is full of baloney.
He's actually probably in the top five most untrustworthy people who are members of public roulette forums, having a proven track record of deceiving people. He has a long line of aliases including one, "stevetracker", which he used to try some PM scam. "Horsey" was almost stung for 10,000 euros.
Go on, ask the expert a simple question about casino maths, see if he can give you a straight answer....I'm betting no.
there is more drama than high school here! lol
QuoteSince this strategy works on the law of averages you need to make sure that, logically, your desired outcome is going to come up. This strategy focuses on betting on one of the dozens (1st 12, 2nd 12, and 3rd 12).
The Low Dozen (also known as the 1st 12) contains the numbers 1-12. If you spin the wheel and the number 3 comes up, for example, it is in the Low Dozen.
The Medium Dozen (also known as the 2nd 12) contains the numbers 13-24. If you spin the wheel and the number 18 comes up, for example, it is in the Medium Dozen.
The High Dozen (also known as the 3rd 12) contains the numbers 25-36. If you spin the wheel and the number 33 comes up, for example, it is in the High Dozen.
Please note that the number 0 is not in any of the dozens.
Spin the wheel and record the result of the spin as either 0, L, M, or H. For example, if you spun the wheel and the numbers 1, 19, 19, 30, and 0 all came up you would record L, M, M, H, 0. You are recording the results of the spins in this way because you are looking for a specific pattern to arise.
Once a specific dozen hasn't come up in the last five spins stop spinning the wheel. For example, if your spins looked like M, H, H, H, M you would stop spinning as you are now going to start betting on L.
For starters, the "law of averages" is a fallacy. Waiting for 5 spins where a particular dozen doesn't show doesn't mean it's more likely to hit in the next few spins, and in the meantime, you are missing all the times it
does hit in the first 5 spins - the advantage is exactly zero.
Second, the recommended progression is very aggressive, you win most of the time, but these small wins will be more than offset
when you lose the entire progression. You might have made more than $200 before you lose it, but you won't make a steady $57 per hour as the author claims.
But don't listen to me, give it a try, it's your money!
It's really the only way you'll learn.
redking, there are better ways out there to make money at roulette. it just might take a bit of time to figure them out. but this one is a bad idea, especially if you convince yourself that it is good system. i know people who have lost a lot of money on systems like these. there are much better ways out there.