The search is over...

[pihh]

and an explanation of this works?

that would be great !!

[Madiba]

@pihh

I asked for spins from forum members
I then sent through all my predictions with both a 24# moderate and 6# aggresive system and both passed without any failings (refer to systems section for proof)

however that is still not good enough for many forum members
im not sure why?
how can you make that call on a system that has not yet been proven to fail?

if you are serious and want to WIN then contact me via email for further proof and testing

... the search is over ... 

[System]

@pihh

I asked for spins from forum members
I then sent through all my predictions with both a 24# moderate and 6# aggresive system and both passed without any failings (refer to systems section for proof)

however that is still not good enough for many forum members
im not sure why?
how can you make that call on a system that has not yet been proven to fail?

if you are serious and want to WIN then contact me via email for further proof and testing

. . .  the search is over . . .  

Sorry Where in the system sections?

[System]

Your email address is hidden.

What is your mail?

[Madiba]

The below link is for the testing done so far from numbers submitted from forum users.

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/sytems-tools-and-services-for-sale/roulette-tipster/msg137693/?topicseen#msg137693

To summarise the system:

Analyse last 24 spins out
Mild attack - play 24 numbers predicted for next 12 spins or until profit (can be as early as spin #1)
Flat betting or mild progression (averages 9 wins per 12 spins)

Aggressive attack - play 6 numbers for 12 spins or until profit (can be as early as spin #1)

Very aggressive - play 1 number for 36 spins or until profit (can be as early as spin #1)

If you play a minimum of 60 consecutive spins (5 cycles), guaranteed 10 wins profit, so if you betting $5 per number, each win is $60 and session win is $600

Have enabled my email for all to view

[Madiba]

dada@madiba.za.net

[System]

Thanks Madiba,

Will mail you.

[ReDsQuaD]

@pihh

I asked for spins from forum members
I then sent through all my predictions with both a 24# moderate and 6# aggresive system and both passed without any failings (refer to systems section for proof)

however that is still not good enough for many forum members
im not sure why?
how can you make that call on a system that has not yet been proven to fail?

if you are serious and want to WIN then contact me via email for further proof and testing

... the search is over ...

The search was never there in the 1st place! Roulette has and is being beaten every day you idiot.

You really do think your the 1st person to beat this game. It makes me laugh, you really have no idea do you? Well you haven't and certainly not the 1st!!

You are nothing special.

You also wounder why this system is not good enough, well I gave you the reasons already.

For those who may I think I am harsh, well this guy talks out of hes ass and it annoys me that he thinks he's the 1st to beat the game with another flawed mathematical system. This is just newbie shit and its just an insult to my intelligence, and others too.

[Madiba]

@ redsquad

I NEVER SAID THAT I AM THE ONLY ONE TO HAVE A WINNING SYSTEM - BUT I AM 100%  SURE THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE 

I CHALLENGE YOU TO A CONTEST TO PROVE WHO NEEDS TO BE 

CAN YOU BACK IT UP OR ARE YOU JUST ALL TALK ?

THE FORUM CAN NOMINATE A MEMBER TO POST SPINS (all i need is batches of 24 spins)

[Nathan Detroit]

madiba,



I presume  those  numbers  given are only valid for the  single  0 wheel.Correct.

Nathan Detroit

[Madiba]

@nathan

yes - single 0
I have not tested on 00 as we do not have those tables here

[Nathan Detroit]

Thanks.


That`s what I thought. The 0/00 would be  an entirely differen ball game.


N.D.

[Bebediktus]

@ redsquad

I NEVER SAID THAT I AM THE ONLY ONE TO HAVE A WINNING SYSTEM

Madiba, lets say you have wining system. But that  can say everybody . From that what read here I not see anything better than simple progression. Your hits are in range of normal distribution not more. And that see also others .

[ReDsQuaD]

@ redsquad

I NEVER SAID THAT I AM THE ONLY ONE TO HAVE A WINNING SYSTEM - BUT I AM 100%  SURE THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE  

I CHALLENGE YOU TO A CONTEST TO PROVE WHO NEEDS TO BE  

CAN YOU BACK IT UP OR ARE YOU JUST ALL TALK ?

THE FORUM CAN NOMINATE A MEMBER TO POST SPINS (all I need is batches of 24 spins)

You're a real *modified by mod with  warning*

[Steve]

ReDsQuaD does know what he's talking about. Anyway guys, why all the conflict?

[Steve]

-