*The Cauldron*

[insidebet]

I did share it  when I first joined this forum.

Had very little feedback then.  I suppose that everybody was too busy working on their progressions schemes and their Money management.

For personal reasons, I will not talk about it again.

Indider

[JavierTT]

Hello!

Lets talk about The Cauldron. This forum is to talk about that, dont you think?

[insidebet]

Exactly!!!

Has anyone tried for real or testing only?

Insidebet

[JavierTT]

I have been trying for real. The results are not too good. I have been working with 1-2-1-2.... progression. I have lost more than I won.


I have to say that when I was losing was better no play at all better than play with 1 chip. The drawdowns was really longs. When you win, you win a lot too but not enough to recovery all you lost before. If you want I can write here the results.

Anyway I still believe in this system  

[insidebet]

Hello,
I can assure you that if you cannot win flatbet, no progression is going to change the result.  So, if I can give you my two bits of advice, dont waste your time testing the progression part of it.

How many spins have you tested and how many units are you down so far?

Insidebet

[JavierTT]

My results for now are -190 chips on 500 spins approx.

Greetings.

Javier.

[jrhelp007]

Hello JavierTT,

I agree with you in terms of generating profit vs. losses.

I ran about 50,000 flat bets I was up off and on then accumulated about +190 units, but I ended up losing 8,550.

I ran statistics on the numbers to see what is the cause of the losses beside the fact that it didn't hit the appropriate group(s)!

I further investigated and mapped the numbers/areas of the wheel to areas of the table 0 thru 36 to see what is taken place? I found out that the repetitive numbers only had a small fraction of the losses. The main cause had to do with "SLEEPERS" or a poor reference of certain areas of the wheel.

my faith in this system dissolved after I ran another 45000 spins and hand up with losses. Nevertheless on real play on the Atlantic City tables at various Casinos I ended up with losses.

So long my friends searching another system.

One that is looking promising is GAMLET FIRE which I hand up with 65% winning. Trying to asses my losses and figuring out if I violated its rules and/or my Money management was wrong?


"HAPPY HOLIDAYS"

John

[insidebet]

How did you run those 95000 spins so fast?  Do you have a code? Can we see it?

Insidebet

[Far-Q]

Where do I find this "Gamlet Fire??

[birdhands]

Run a search for gamlet fire and you will find what is probably the strangest thread on the entire forum.  It literally made my head spin.  

John, were you running the sectors (wait for a sector to repeat in three spins and then bet it 6 times)?  I ran this on 200 spins and lost consistently.

I know this is Bombus' Cauldron thread; I'm just curious.

Sam

[iggiv]

if fire really worked everybody would play it by now.

[bombus]

I typed for the members on this board real number of a "0" wheel roulette  from a land Casino in Atlantic City:

1. You can practice the system using the below numbers.

2. Apply Money management and to show you what happen if you "DON'T WALK AWAY" from a table with a certain  percentage of winning units, you will pay the price!!!

Here are the real spin numbers:

15
4
4
4
24
36
22
15
12
23
5
26
20
18
23
21
20
33
31
11
3
19
6
22
24
27
15
23
30
15
16
32
15
20
5
35
29
21
28
9
2
15
24
7
3
36
1
15
13
4
8
34
6
12
16
13
7
30
2
33
30
22
31
11
3
21
---Left the table---

Someone should run the above numbers as described in the system and post the results...

John

Hi.

I've been away for a little Xmas break.

I'll have to read over all the new posts and answer any that I can soon.

As for jrhelp007's numbers above, the flat bet result is +95 units... Did anyone get the same result? If you didn't then you're doing it wrong.

If the game was played correctly you should have left the table 2 spins earlier or stayed a few more spins, so numbers 3 & 21 are not included in the final score because those 2 numbers would have been part of an unfinished bet. I'll run through the numbers again using the old 1-2 progression when I get a little free time and post the results.

Cheers.

[bombus]

I just ran through the numbers again using the old 1-2 progression.

This time the end result was +224 (not 242-typo-sorry) units profit (not bad for 50 odd spins of betting).

This set of numbers is actually a very good example of how the progression can power up the system.

The 9/10 number bets actually lost 15 units (not much), and the 18/19 number bets actually won 257 units.  


Details to follow.

[schoenpoetser]

I have made an excelprogram of the shoeshineboy with the same number row to compare the systems.

[jrhelp007]

Can you please add titles to the Excel spreadsheet.

Thanks,

John

[jrhelp007]

-