Experiment single number bet.

[Kingspin]

Some evil rng's like ladbrokes for instance which i think is one hell of a nasty  rng the furthest number i have reached is number 14. I don't suggest for one minute that anyone playing this method should play  past number 11.  By the end of the count on number 11 you will have won the vast majority of times any way, plus if you was very unlucky and lost at the end of count 11 the chance of winning the losses back is realistic.  One guy just posted a message saying why not just bet on a hot number , well all i have to say is that if you want to play it that way then by all means please do.  In the meantime i am happy making an hundred a day with this system , i just made another £100 this morning.

[Kingspin]

You would be better playing this system on a rapid roulette real wheel. If some thing works pretty good on rng then it should even better on a real wheel in my opinion. I recommend a real wheel , like i always say rng is play at your peril sort of thing.. When playing for real money on rng then the rng software could start a bet scan and intentionally  start to light up numbers with no bets on. Does it do this , well the answer is without question- yes rng does intentionally throw loosing numbers....

[Kingspin]

 Reply to bene 126 the answer is  no.

[Kingspin]

I think the progression mikeoff just posted is too conservative , like i said the progression should be played as i put in my earlier post , at number 8 it is important to increase the bet to 2 chips.

[Mike.OFF]

Tried this system with fun money.

After a few wins went to №16 and 25 per nubmer bet... and WON! 

[Kingspin]

Ok here is the final system as i am pretty sure is the best way to play.  I honestly think this system works better on rng (thats providing the rng is not cheating).   On real wheels at over 1 spin per minute it simply becomes too long winded sitting  what can seems like ages  and waiting for wins on a bad session means a miscount could happen - trying to keep number counts over long time period means mistakes will happen, i would not personally play it on  a real wheel. A miscount screws the system up big time this i have proved a few times.  So the best way to play is on rng up to the last count on number 11 so you will quit at number 12. The most wins come before number 12 so it's much easier to win back a lost progression. I am sure players will win more than they loose with this system. 

[Jish]

code it into a bot, no human error and you can just walk away and leave it once you adjust the settings

[Jeromin]

If you are going to play one number, why not just play one hot number? Or does that make too much sense?

I thought the same thing. Is there any value in starting form number one on, other than to avoid mistakes? Is it because they're all in the same dozen? Then maybe one can pick 11 numbers from the dozen containing the most repeats in say, the last 30 spins, and start with the most repeated numbers in that dozen.
Then again, the sequence 1-2-3, etc. would contain a random group of both hot and cold numbers, but so would any randomly picked dozen or column. How often does a dozen sleep for over 11 spins? How about picking a sleeping dozen/column? or a hot one?

So much to test, and it takes forever. 

Jeromin

[No More Bets]

Some evil rng's like ladbrokes for instance which I think is one hell of a nasty  rng

Oh no you didn't.     

Ladbrokes plc is a British based betting & gaming company listed on the FTSE 100 Index.

They are the UK's largest off-track bookmaker with 2000+ retail outlets in the UK, Ireland and Belgium.

Ladbrokes holds betting and gaming licences in the UK and Gibraltar and offers sports bets, online poker and casino.

They are consistent, and their easy access to your funds gives me great confidence in recommending them to anyone.

Their RNG is fair, their operation is above repute.

They are a respected, multi million pound BM operation with integrity and way too much to lose.

So, don't even...

[Allin]

Hi KingSpin,

      Is it still working, do you think its worth to test.?

Regards

[Jish]

Hi KingSpin,

     Is it still working, do you think its worth to test.?

Regards

ofcourse it works lol, just get a big enough bankroll and hold your breath, i tried this system, but i played it with 10 numbers at once, lots more exciting

[Allin]

Hmmm if it works why need to " hold our breath".....:-P.  OK let me test n post the results.

[Jish]

Hmmm if it works why need to " hold our breath

because you watch your money slowly drain away...more and more and more and you never know when the win will come

[Allin]

Not sure why but it is pretty inconsistent with Random.org 

Tried upto 11th number progression.

Session (1) spins (10K) Final result 420$
Session (2) spins (10K) Final result 657$
Session (3) spins (10K) Final result -477$

My biggest draw down was -1400, but later it recovered.

Regards

[Jish]

Not sure why but it is pretty inconsistent with Random.org 

Tried upto 11th number progression.

Session (1) spins (10K) Final result 420$
Session (2) spins (10K) Final result 657$
Session (3) spins (10K) Final result -477$

My biggest draw down was -1400, but later it recovered.

Regards

would you like to play a system watching your money go down down down? then maybe up, try kingspins roulette bingo it has great reviews

[Jish]

-