Experiment single number bet.

[Allin]

Hmmm we should not let them down, they are giving their best to get some new ideas, we should encourage them. I give him big  for his ideas.

Good try my dear friend.

[Kingspin]

Yes this system is a snail grail.  Have a  Bigish bankroll play on small stake live wheel and you win every time. I never lost a session to date , only problem is I don't have the patience.  You can be sat waiting over an hour for the number to hit which it always does.  One reason it works really good this method is because you are targeting a single dozen with many of bets.  

Just laughing at the guy who says ladbrokes rng is fair.  

Many guys have lost a fortune at that rng.

I am not saying ladbrokes are cheats , not for one minute.

Just the software they use on there rng is highly suspect. No one could convince me other wise.
Cheating software without any question ."mr ladbrokes protector".  
The way the software at ladbrokes plays against the player especially on red black betting shows to me that the rng is switching in losing bets and is not true honest random event.  If any bill gates computer expert was to delve into how rng's tick I am sure they would agree that rng can cheat.

[Allin]

Hmmm I disagree though, RNG just a Random number generator in timely fashion.  But real wheel generate the same combination with some additional time(sometimes it takes days to get certain combination, but eventually they will come).

Another reason why RNG you lose faster is that it is in your control.  You can spin 10 numbers in a minute time, But where as in real wheel 10spins will take 10 minutes or more.

RNG you lose your entire bankroll in days
Real wheel you lose your entire  bankroll in weeks
Real wheel shorter sessions you lose your entire  bankroll in months

Thats the Moral of this roulette.

[Jish]

Yes also RNG is TRUE, 37 numbers picked at total random on the other hand real wheel is open to many variations, humans, manufacturing, warping, ball velocity, spin, drop height.....

[Jish]

If you are going to play one number, why not just play one hot number? Or does that make too much sense?

I was under the impression that hot numbers do not exist, each spin is random, individual, alone, solo...etc etc

[Davey-Jones]

Not true. Hot and cold numbers do exist. It's knowing the reasons why they exist that is important. Sometimes numbers are hot for a reason. Cold numbers can be cold for a reason too.

[Jish]

Not true. Hot and cold numbers do exist. It's knowing the reasons why they exist that is important. Sometimes numbers are hot for a reason. Cold numbers can be cold for a reason too.

Davey, I have never come across one single formula that can accurately predict a hot number, some can predict some of the hot numbers but the times it fails you lose chunks of your bankroll. You say there are reasons numbers could be hot or cold, we should have a chat about it sometime. Although... some claim to have the formula but on this site there are alot of claims, so many people say they have this and that but never offer stone cold proof, perhaps its ego

[Kingspin]

 
The progression I now use is this one below. So far I have not lost a progression. Should you lose all bets in the progression then you lose 416 chips.
You win 93 out of every 100 progressions.
spin   bet
1   1
2   1
3   1
4   1
5   1
6   1
7   1
8   1
9   1
10   1
11   1
12   1
13   1
14   1
15   1
16   1
17   1
18   1
19   1
20   1
21   1
22   1
23   1
24   2
25   2
26   2
27   2
28   2
29   2
30   2
31   2
32   2
33   2
34   2
35   2
36   2
37   2
38   2
39   2
40   2
41   2
42   2
43   3
44   3
45   3
46   3
47   3
48   3
49   3
50   3
51   3
52   3
53   3
54   3
55   4
56   4
57   4
58   4
59   4
60   4
61   4
62   4
63   4
64   5
65   5
66   5
67   5
68   5
69   5
70   5
71   6
72   6
73   6
74   6
75   6
76   6
77   7
78   7
79   7
80   7
81   7
82   8
83   8
84   8
85   8
86   9
87   9
88   9
89   9
90   10
91   10
92   10
93   10
94   11
95   11
96   11
97   12
98   12
99   12
Bet as follows up to number 13. Never bet past number 13. The losses are massive if you go much past 13.
Bet
spin   bet
1   1.
2   11.
3   111.
4   1111.
5   11111.
6   111111.
7   1122222.
8   22222222.
9   222222333.
10   3333333334.
11   44444444555.
12   555566666677.
13   777888899991010.
r li

[Jish]

So far I have not lost a progression.

Looks good!

You win 93 out of every 100 progressions.

ey?

[MATTJONO]

thats a bullshit system, ive just done this now, I started from 0 ended at 36 and diddnt win once, I think you might need shooting for suggesting this!

I disagree,

its a geat idea for a system...... I suppose its how good you are at choosing your numbers to bet some players will have better techniques to choosing the numbers to bet. (not saying i have just that kingspin could play this and never ever lose in his life.

mattjono

[shishir]

this sys of bettin is a  idea.
what if u touch the upper limit ?
and that is the prob in mech.  roulette very much.

[RouletteRoy]

Better still,

Bet 3 on 1-19
bet 2 on 25-36
bet 1 on 16 and 19 between.
most of the time no win no lost, and win 18 when 16 of 19
u can put 1 on 4 number in between 20,21-23-24

or increase bet 6 on 1-19
bet 4 on 25-36

[lommelaartje]

I tested this system with play money on an RNG-wheel. After 15min, playing €1 chips, i eventually won +€109.
The four wins: number 9 - 9 - 8 - 5.

Very quick results, but it's play money...

[lommelaartje]

Anyone still playing this system succesfully without a loss in the long run?

[lommelaartje]

-