can i take you out the zone for a sec.................

[Spike!]

>House edge negative expectancy are not EVEN ON THE GRID. Simply find out if something balances out to its exepected hit percentage over 100 spins. Devide into two. And see how each 50 performs in relation to the other. THATS it mystery solved..>

Hidden Math 101, Herb. Consult your manual.

>>CONCLUSION ROULETTE IS VERY, VERY BEATABLE. >>

Live with it Herb.

[Herb6]

You're joking right?

Do you honestly believe that you can figure a wheel out by just watching 100 spins?

[Spike!]

Do you have a brain Herb?  You don't arrive at 100. 100 IS THE NUMBER WE MEASURE PERCENTAGE BY CORRECT? It is also the number that breaks the game of roulette.>>>

Herb has a brain, but he was on drugs the whole year they taught this in college. Lighten up on him, dude..

[Number Six]

Fender, All I can say is wow!  You have a great deal to learn.>>

He's another grad of Wendel University, leave him alone. Its a new math, a purer math, the true math. Quit being so damned jealous, Herb.

It took fender 10 years to complete his graduation in hidden math, so it clearly it isn't an easy subject to master and we should respect his determination. However, he missed the short cut most people in the real world work take. If he'd have gone to a proper university, or even a school, he could have learned the ins and outs of these new and amazing hidden procedures in all of 5 minutes.

[Number Six]

Einstein, YOU the postman, cannot explain why a so-called random game with no memory DOES THAT.

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_randomness

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_process

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_walk

[Number Six]

DOES IT TURN A PROFIT OR NOT?

No.

The bet selection means nothing. It hits at 80% because the maths says it will, meaning if you played flat stakes you would lose 2.7p for every £1 you wagered. All you're trying to do is overcome the house edge with a progression, which is mathematically impossible with a practical system and you can't prove otherwise.

[Number Six]

When does it sink in 6 HOUSE EDGE DOES NOT HINDER THE ZONE IT HELPS IT.

So you're the only person in the entire world and the history of the world that wasn't affected by the house edge? You ARE a new Wendel. All you have is theories and at best they are nonsense. You're very ignorant.

[moles40]

No.

The bet selection means nothing. It hits at 80% because the maths says it will, meaning if you played flat stakes you would lose 2.7p for every £1 you wagered. All you're trying to do is overcome the house edge with a progression, which is mathematically impossible with a practical system and you can't prove otherwise.

Why are you obsessed with the house edge all the time and the maths.Do you constantly think of the negative aspects of the game every time you play,because if you do their is no point whatsoever of you playing the game at all.

[macduff]

fender,have checked 4300 spins.all at dublin bet and super casino.
2 dozens together was 650,3 dozens together was 210,4 dozens together was 63,5dozens together was 27,6 dozens together was 5,7dozens together was 1,and 8 dozens together was also 1.
forgot to track same sequence runs,but will do.   a lot to be said for computer tracking.  

[Number Six]

Why are you obsessed with the house edge all the time and the maths.Do you constantly think of the negative aspects of the game every time you play,because if you do their is no point whatsoever of you playing the game at all.

What else is there? When you're using a system like fender's the only things are the negative aspects. It's called being realistic and pragmatic. Conversely why do you constantly delude yourself into thinking you can beat the random game with a system that is based on gambler's fallacy?

Why are you desperate to believe that fender knows what he is talking about? He is horribly off the mark. Everything he says is a rookie's cliche. Use his system, just don't invest money in it you can't afford to lose. Don't be swayed by his nonsense. He's the next James Wendel.

[Bayes]

have you never been taught "the law of averages"

nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_averages

I guess Wikipedia is wrong.   

[Bayes]

-