Roulette is a lucky game with a negative expectation...NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS

[balint]

I think all three (Jakk, Mr j, Carpanta) have something in common ,
you  play by own rules and  these rules yes are fixed , but not rigid ,
is  like some methods  that can t  be encoded.   There is something
most important, something that can not be coded, something which if
we use together with  experience  help us get out to the surface, the  human decision.
We  decide( not the system) when enter or exit to game, when  is the right moment to do this  or that.....
You are not the only ones who think and play like this,  there are others, too.
Or  I am wrong ?

Cheers.

[Mr J]

I agree and I'm not even saying the rules are SMART but for someone to suggest there are NO fixed rules for my methods, thats crazy talk. I dont see how Jakk can win, he's an AP (cough) guy.  Ken

[Jakkalsdraai]

I agree and I'm not even saying the rules are SMART but for someone to suggest there are NO fixed rules for my methods, thats crazy talk. I dont see how Jakk can win, he's an AP (cough) guy.  Ken

I see Kimo Li's methods as AP as well!  It has to be cause I'm getting an advantage.

[balint]

I don t care if  is or not AP ,  i like Kimo s methods  ,especially the *stars* and half stars( 3 numbers).
Btw... Jakk  you have not reply to me on the other thread you started about Kimo method.

[Bayes]

I think all three (Jakk, Mr j, Carpanta) have something in common ,
you  play by own rules and  these rules yes are fixed , but not rigid ,
is  like some methods  that can t  be encoded.   There is something
most important, something that can not be coded, something which if
we use together with  experience  help us get out to the surface, the  human decision.
We  decide( not the system) when enter or exit to game, when  is the right moment to do this  or that.....
You are not the only ones who think and play like this,  there are others, too.
Or  I am wrong ?
Cheers.

What's the difference between "fixed" and "rigid"?

ALL methods can be coded.

What's the difference between a "human" decision and any other kind?

Think about it, every decision which can't be coded must depend not on any previous experience or research, but the whim of the moment, or a feeling. Maybe you just have a "hunch" that things are going to get worse. Computers aren't capable of any of these things. Ironically, they're damned because of it, and yet those same emotionally driven bets are also damned as detrimental and "unprofessional". 

[balint]

Maybe you just have a "hunch" that things are going to get worse.*

Bayes, first my english is poor...

No is not about a hunch or a feeling.  We can  see  when the things  are going  worse
because the bankroll goes  down , now is the moment to  take  the
human decision and  stop when the things  are going  down, and wait  until  the things
tend to go up, than bet again. Yes I know  can go bad again ( for that we have a stop lose, or two
stop loses, the first and *the second *which is the final stop lose),   or can  go good(up)  and win.
I am talking about only flat bet systems.

And yes human decisions can be included( partially) in the rules(can be coded) but not  100%,
because when play for real money we can take another decision... Humans...
I will give you(if you wish) something to code, if you can code,    better for me,
this way I can test my  method  for  much more spins.

Cheers

[cilxeskyd]

The only way to make money from roulette(or any casino game) is to have Supernatural powers and know what will win next.

Correct. .

[hoper35]

Correct. .

It will likely save you money to believe that.

[Steve]

In reality there are quite a few methods that do beat roulette consistently under reasonable circumstances. You realistically cannot beat roulette 100% of the time though. I'm talking about real wheels, not rng. If you believe otherwise., you simply need to be educated on the matter because it's actually quite well known to even casinos themselves - although much of the staff have no real understanding.

[Steve]

-