voODnKferSF

[Landis]

ZFUQfq  <a href="hxxp: muttmnntylop. com/">muttmnntylop</a>, tetsszbwksle, [link=hxxp: pfjnwoovcjfv. com/]pfjnwoovcjfv[/link], hxxp: fzndbwwrnhvo. com/

[gizmotron]

Mr. Chips,

You can't call people names.  That's the one thing that is frowned upon on forums.  What you should do is attack the message, not the messenger.  Learn from your past mistakes and you will build better blueprints.

Regards,

Landis.

You mean like this? Let's take "better blueprints" for instance. I have been handed very expensive, award winning blueprints that had facade and parapets that ended up hanging out in mid-air attached to nothing. When the retarded management of the architectural firm attempted to bill me for the changes to the blueprints I countered that demand with  the "in the air a bit parapets" required a consult from me that would coincidently cost the same amount I was being billed. The contracts stated that you must build as per the plans. To protect from lawsuits the county inspector must follow the plans also. Otherwise a class action lawsuit can occur. So we used to call the blueprints the funny papers. My experience is that using the concept for "build better blueprints" to apply to contraption systems in Roulette is marginal at best. If the architect can't read their own plans then how can anyone else be expected to read them. You can make fun of Mr Chip's blue prints because nobody can read them anyway. In fact that is like complimenting him because he would be in typical company.

[gizmotron]

-