IMBALANCE ROULETTE

[hermes]

IMBALANCE SYSTEM FOR DOZENS AND COLUMNS

Easy system to play on 2 dozens or 2 columns. The idea enlightened me recently at visiting casino.
You bet only last imbalanced triple spins, not balanced one. Eg. 123, 231, 222, 333, 111, are balanced triples and you don't bet, you wait (play virtually) for imbalanced triple spin coming like 221, 112, 323, 331, 332, 212, 232 and so on... There must be always 2 of the same dozen and one different dozen in last 3 spins to make the 3 spins imbalanced.
There are 2 versions to play this system.

Version A/ bet only if one dozen comes twice in row on the end of the triple period plus one single dozen like 122, 233, 311. The double dozen must appear on the end. Then you bet the single dozen and the missing one against the double. This system is more secure but making fewer chips. Security costs always money.

Version B/ bet the single and missing dozen any time imbalance occurs (121, 233, 212, 331 and so no...). Don't have to wait for double on the end of the triple spins. More rewarding but less security.
Recommended progression would be: Leveller 1-2-4-8; or Golden Roulette Progression +12 units or -6 units, which one comes first (if won rise 1 unit on both, if lost rise 1 unit on both up to +12 or -6 units & reset).

Real example from casino table 1 would explain better the strategy:
#     W/L 2Dbet
32  -
8    -
24  -       balance 312, wait for imbalance
14  -
26  W   1/3
30  W   1/3
6     W   1/2
3     W   1/2
14   W   2/3
23   L     1/3
30  W   1/3
27  W   1/3
4     W   1/2
7     W   1/2
11   L     2/3
15   -      balance 111, wait
22  W    2/3
8     W   1/3
14   L     1/3
29   W   1/3
34   -      balance 123, wait
18  W    1/2
28  L      1/2
20  W    1/2
3     W   1/2
32   -     balance 321, wait
13  -
00  -      lucky this time!
13  -      balance 132, wait
35  W   1/3
6    W    1/3
7    -      balance 231, wait
4   L       2/3
36  -      balance 111, wait
33  W    2/3
34  L      1/2
27  -   balance 333, wait
20  -
32  L    1/2
21  W  1/2
3     W 1/3
23  -    balance321, wait  
6    W   1/3
END

The second table has 4 losses in row which are easy overcome with both suggested progressions.
There is a free choice how to play after zero comes. You can wait one spin or play by taking in consideration the last 3 spins before zero.
I would like to hear your results and opinions from your testing.
I tested from that time already a couple of hundred spins at home. Easy wins like butter and bread.
The only formations that can hurt the system will be 3 times triple like 111-222-111 or 123-321-123 which doesn't come so often, and if it comes we can recognize the pattern and build-in some waiting period like switching to play the same on columns. There is a small probability that D/C will create parallel the same pattern.  Mostly is it contrary.
The progressions are strong enough when we have sufficient bankroll but I don't know yet how much bankroll will be needed.
Cheers Hermes

[A3on47]

Thanks for sharing this system Hermes


With the leveler progression, at the 4th loss we stop and start the progression again (1-2-4-8 and stop)?
Or we keep doubling until we hit a win?

Cheers

[hermes]

After we hit the 4th stage of progression we bet the last one until again in plus. Then back to 1 unit. The last stage 8 units x 2 is option for higher bankrolls. The 4th works great for lower bankrolls.
Hermes

[bikemotorman]

You are the man Hermes very good idea.

[hermes]

Biky, it was not my idea but coming from the invisible world. I just translated it into plain English. I am the middleman. Who knows could be Garcia on the other side? Ha, ha, ha...
I tested a few more and it holds pretty strong, we will see for how long.
Cheers Hermes

[Fripper]

This seems nice Hermes.

I will see how your testing is going. 

[Rocky]

Great Work Hermes

Thanks for sharing, I don't post much, but I've been around for a while and watch these boards regularly.

Wow! We've all seen a lot of system's but this one, on the face of things, may turn out to be one of the most  outstanding WINNERS.

I'll certainly check this out.

Thanks once again !

[Fripper]

I have now tested it for a session and it is pretty insane!

In 53 spins I made 24 unit in profit, I played version B.   
The highest that I lost in a row was 2 times. 
I used this progression.   

1,1 = 3 if win ( 1 unit profit)
3,3 = 9 if win ( 1 unit profit)
9,9 = 27 if win ( 1 unit profit)
If lose three times= 26 units lost

It looked like this:

W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W


Thanks so much for sharing Hermes!

/Marcus

[hermes]

I am happy that testings are positive. I didn't lose yet with the leveller also. Your progression is a little bit risky, Fripper, not my style. What you can do with your kamikaze progression is to bet only after first W as a trigger. Sort off many LLLL's and zeros. Not suited for greeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedy, impatient gambles! Waiting would cause them heart attacks.
Hermes

[Fripper]

Yes indeed.   But I don't get the leveller progression. 

bet 1 unit on each of the two dozens.   If win then profit 1 unit
bet 2 unit on each of the two dozens.   You win 6 units, and a lose in total of 6.   (2+4).   +/- 0
bet 4 unit on each of the two dozens.   You win 12 units, and a lose in total of 14.   (2+4+8).   a loss of 2 units
bet 8 unit on each of the two dozens.   You win 24 units, and a lose in total of 30.   (2+4+8+16).   a loss of 6 units.   

Do you play like this?

[JHM]

Hermes,

See my testing below, I tested your version 1 + my tweak (when 2 dozen occur in 3 spins than bet eg 121,131,212,232,313,323 are all triggers

A. = dozen
B. = version 1 + tweak
C. = version 1 hermes

A B C
2
1
1
1 L L
3
2 W W
3
3 L
1 W W
1 W W
1 L L
3
2 W W
0
1
1
1
1
1
3
1 L L
1
1 L L
2
3 W W
1
3  
2
3
2 W
2 L
3 W W
2 L W
3 W
2 W
1 W
2
2 L
3 W W
3 W W
2 W W
1 W W
3
3
3 L L
1
3 L L
1 W
1
1 L L
0
2
3
2
3 W
2 W
3 W
2 W
3 W
2 W
1 W
1
2 W W
1 L L
1
3 W W
2 W W
3
1 W
3
2 W
2
2 L L
3
3 W W
3 L L
2
2 W W
1 W W
1 W W

+3 -2

[paulthepilot]

Congrats Hermes, your idea is really great. 
I am playing everyday since 20 years in a live casino near Paris France (Enghien).
Yesterday i wrote all the numbers for 3 hours on table 1 and the maximum successives losses were never over 2 (with your proposal n°1).  I have tons of systems in french , english, italian, i never saw this attack.  But frankly the bet progressions you purposed are not very clear for me, can you please give us more infos or examples on them.

Thanks again

Paul

[balint]

bet 1 unit on each of the two dozens.   If win then profit 1 unit
bet 2 unit on each of the two dozens.   You win 6 units, and a lose in total of 6.   (2+4).   +/- 0
bet 4 unit on each of the two dozens.   You win 12 units, and a lose in total of 14.   (2+4+8).   a loss of 2 units
bet 8 unit on each of the two dozens.   You win 24 units, and a lose in total of 30.   (2+4+8+16).   a loss of 6 units.   

Do you play like this?

I have some experience with this system, and is a good system, bankroll go up and down and up,
you don t have to be greedy, that s  all ,   when in plus* something* stop.
That progression is correct  , but you have to stay on 2 or 4  or 8 until  see your bankroll in plus.

[Fripper]

Where shall I play this system? Online live wheel? just online? or maybe at a real casino?

I did have a bad turn today with 4 losses then I did stop.   I lost with the leveller progression 30 units.   I played at a online casino.

[balint]

Hermes told you  if you are new with a system, start to bet after the  first W after L s,    (L...)LW ...bet now.
I only tested this system  (live wheels),  and again if you found a new system ,
do not play  until have made  a lot of tests.
Only live wheels and real casino, and if you lose on 8/8 ,stay on this 8/8 , Hermes  way, I think.
He can tell you better.

[balint]

-