My system - 1 number betting

[bee19]

Hello everybody,

I'd like to introduce you my system.    .    .     Maybe it exists somewhere else.     This system is about betting still at the same number without waiting (I think if you wait for example 36 spins you lose less but you win less).     There is progression too of course.    

Progression: 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,
2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,
3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,
4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,
5,5,5,5,5,5,5 then at the beginning


What do you think about it?

code for RX

Code Select Expand



Method "main"
Begin


While Starting a New Session


    Begin
        Set List [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,5,5,5] to
        Record "progression" Data
        Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Number 0
    End
   
While on Each Spin
    Begin
         // While number 0 has not hit more for 18 each times
       // begin

        If Any Number Bet has Won Each time
            Begin
                Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
            End
        If Any Number Bet has Lost Each time
            Begin
                Add 1 to Record "progression" Data Index
                If Record "progression" Data Index > Record "progression" Data Count
                    Begin
                        Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
                  // End
            End
        end
Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Number 0
End
   //end
End


(sorry for my english  )

[Kingspin]

I have never tried it but I have heard of others who tried it and they lost because the number they bet on slept for something like 100 - 150 spins.  Boredom sat waiting for a single number to hit would be a problem too. I think most others might agree this a very risky method.

[bee19]

I can see in simulation in roulette xtreme for "only" 20000 spins there are intervals 300 and more. . .  In this system is max interval 82 spins and you lose 179 units.  I have second variant with max interval 136 spins but there is lose 881 units and in symulation is it much worse.  So i think it isn't perfect but it works not bad. 

I don't know what is it altered at that chart - it's demo of RX so maybe this is reason

[bee19]

yes it is, but which system isn't.  I know this is very risky - reason why I only simulate it  And maybe somebody will improve it

[Davemd]

I have played before where I wait for a number to appear twice and then back it for 100 spins,

when a 2nd number appears twice then I start backing that for 100 spins,

and 3rd and 4th etc etc.

I have had very mixed results on this,

sometimes broke even after 200 spins,

sometimes 300 units down,

my best win was 1300 units but it was only once in about 10 sessions.

Not really sure where else to go with it,

hope this has been some help,

                                        Regards,

                                                   Davemd.
           

[pins]

as all bets are equal in the long run. this way is as good as any.

[Davemd]

Have you ever tried it with any success pins ?

                                                             Regards,

                                                                        Davemd.

[gingermolloy]

see link guys

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/if-you-could-bet-on-a-single-number-for-100-spins/msg45377/#msg45377

ginger

[Kingspin]

I tried that method phil but on single streets , the idea is you keep betting on the last single street to hit going for the last street to show a repeat.  Streets repeat all the time i thought. I sort a really nice long progression out and start to bet real money, guess what on the first attempt no single street repeated until after 65 spins    .   I lost about £300 i think. Just shows how evil the wheel can be.

[bee19]

So any new i haven't invented :-D. . .  So i was thinking about next alternative but i can't designed it in RX. . . 

1.  Step - Make free spins (at least 36+; maybe up to 200+ spins)
2.  Step - Find out number which hasn't been
3.  Step - Bet at this number with this progression
4.  Step - If won then make again free spins or if we lose make a free spins too

The reason - if we know that in RNG are some cycles (i read about it in this forum too - some chaos random cycles) so maybe this is the way how cycles can be minimazed because we won't still bet at the same number. . .

Can somebody help me program it?

Or maybe it exist somewhere and it is nothing new again :-D

[Jakkalsdraai]

I think I would choose 6 numbers.

Then play each as seperate entities for 36 spins. No progression.

Stop on a win. Continue other numbers through the cycle.

I would most probably take the 6 numbers evenly spread around the wheel. Or 100% other way round, take 6 spins adjasent too each other.

Not tested or anything, just an idea.
Cheers
Jakk

[casinopitbull]

Hello everybody,

I'd like to introduce you my system.    .    .     Maybe it exists somewhere else.     This system is about betting still at the same number without waiting (I think if you wait for example 36 spins you lose less but you win less).     There is progression too of course.    

Progression: 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,
2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,
3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,
4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,
5,5,5,5,5,5,5 then at the beginning


What do you think about it?

code for RX

Code Select Expand



Method "main"
Begin


While Starting a New Session


    Begin
        Set List [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,5,5,5] to
        Record "progression" Data
        Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Number 0
    End
   
While on Each Spin
    Begin
         // While number 0 has not hit more for 18 each times
       // begin

        If Any Number Bet has Won Each time
            Begin
                Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
            End
        If Any Number Bet has Lost Each time
            Begin
                Add 1 to Record "progression" Data Index
                If Record "progression" Data Index > Record "progression" Data Count
                    Begin
                        Put 1 on Record "progression" Data Index
                  // End
            End
        end
Put 100% of Record "progression" Data to Number 0
End
   //end
End


(sorry for my english  )

man  nothing   wrong  about   your  thing but i  seen  sleepers  more  then  150   spins   not   comes this can   cost  huge  amount  money definitly  so  far   best  what i   ever seen  is  here  LW  method which  give   u  sometimes  nice edge   over house

[RPro75]

I think this can work if you have a long history of spins and can see what numbers are sleeping, what numbers aren't, etc.  If you can find a way to make the right number selection, this can work well.

[cekkinus]

only 100000 real venice boules

[MattyMattz]

  If you can find a way to make the right number selection, this can work well.

Isn't that kinda the deal with any system?

MM

[MattyMattz]

-