Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Beating a math game with math

Started by TurboGenius, August 04, 2008, 12:19:35 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TurboGenius

This thread will explain one way to beat a math game using math :)

Stay tuned - the only delay is running as many examples as possible before posting.

Buffster

Yep...This is gonna be good, I know it. I can feel it in my bones.

Yo TG...How ya been ?

Still keeping busy...I see !

Keep us posted.

Buffster

TwoCatSam


Roulette787

Quote from: Bago on August 04, 2008, 08:49:50 AM
The math of this game is you hit a number 1/37 and you are paid 36 (35+1), in the long term (what counts). Therefore, the player has a negative expectancy of 2,70%.

You cannot beat the math of this game with your gambler's fallacies on past numbers.


Then why are you here anyway?

cps10

I agree...let's try anyway. I think TG has much more experience than most...let's take a swipe at it!

All ears TG! Or eyes I reckon!

Lanky

Hi Turbo

Thanks a lot for what you are about to share with us Mate.

I remember Victor telling me this once.

""when the student is ready the teaching will come ""

It would appear that there are some of us that want to learn & Improve.

And there are some that would Boo Santa Clause.

Good On Ya Mate

Lanky

TurboGenius

Bago is correct - the house has the math advantage over the player.

However, there are ways to play so that the player's balance stays right
around that "edge" - That is what I'll show with this method - and it will
make more sense perhaps :)  The player's balance will wander in both directions
and stopping when a profit is reached is possible.

The house "edge" is small - only 1 unit per cycle of 37 spins (or 38).
so 1/37th of 1 unit per spin (very small)
This is simple to overcome when done properly.

cps10

TG

Would that include taking advantage of wins after a loss to recover that 1 unit every cycle?

Keith

ChickenDinner

Hi Turbo,

Like everyone else, I'm looking forward to hearing this method.

Bago is obviously right about the math, but as nothing in the universe is truely random - as the great philosophers have claimed - it seems plausible that the math can be manipulated to create a system where you only lose if you are very unlucky (a method that is about as close to a HG as mathmatically possible).

Bring it on!

CD

rev

 ;D Hi T-Nice 2 see ya back around-On average how many unit's per cycle does your new method average?? P.Mail await's u

TurboGenius

It's coming Bago, roulette is on the major back burner at the moment :)

Glad to see you here though, you always bring the "anti-turbo" attitude which
does little but is indeed entertaining to read.

Herb

He does help keep the ideas in the real world.

Ray


Boo_Ray


JHM

Yes, Bago is right and a little childish ;).

I'm very curious TG.
If it's true what you say. If every roulette player would play this way the casino's edge would be gone  ;D.

Waiting patiently

JHM

-