good design cool

[Landis]

I have an idea.

Here's what we can do.  Let's have Mr. Chips demonstrate his system by placing 5k real bets on Dublinbet.

Mr. Chips, don't worry about the bankroll, we'll let your supporters step forward and bankroll you in a show of support.

Now, here's the big question:  Who would like to step forward and bankroll Mr. Chips?  How about you Malcop?  Will you bankroll him?

(I'm guessing that everyone will back away frightened, and that this post will disappear before the end of the day, but I trust that I've made my point.)

-Landis

[malcop]

I have an idea. 

Here's what we can do.    Let's have Mr.   Chips demonstrate his system by placing 5k real bets on Dublinbet. 

Mr.   Chips, don't worry about the bankroll, we'll let your supporters step forward and bankroll you in a show of support. 

Now, here's the big question:  Who would like to step forward and bankroll Mr.   Chips?  How about you Malcop?  Will you bankroll him?

(I'm guessing that everyone will back away frightened, and that this post will disappear before the end of the day, but I trust that I've made my point.  )

-Landis

You that is a stupid idea, the reason is you can't judge a method on one session, If you looked at the results for signum you will see that their are losing sessions, but in the long run their are more winning sessions than losing ones. 

So your test is like you pointless.    If I find signum to give me the same type of results as what is shown on the signum website I will be more than happy to use my own money and play live for myself only not your benefit!

You see unlike you I'm more than happy to put my money where my mouth is. 

[GogoCro]

Landis,
we all know your opinion and warning about systems.
But is time to move on man.

[Landis]

I'd like to see some real results, not curve fits on old numbers. 

Look, I'm not trying to hound you, or your other ID Mr. Chips.

My point is this:  Don't pretend for one minute that this system works.  Unlike the other system players, I can instantly see through the blarney.  I can tell you within seconds whether a method has merit, or whether it has faulty blueprints.  This system clearly has faulty blueprints because it is dependent on past spins influencing future spins. 

-Landis

[GogoCro]

You are repeating yourself, move on..

[Tangram]

I'd like to see some real results, not curve fits on old numbers.  

Landis,

We both know this won't change anything. What would be the point of Mr Chips taking up the challenge you suggest? Remember the challenge you did with Ray? did it change your attitude?

For some reason you have it in for Mr Chips. Of all the systems you could have picked on, you choose one which flat-bets on the even chances. There is really not much chance of someone losing a bundle doing this, even if they were betting randomly. Why didn't you choose to criticize Mr J's system which seems to be popular at the moment? A 56 step progression on 2 numbers with more than $3000 losses if it fails... It really doesn't square with your "concern" for members losing their bankrolls, does it?

And it's beside the point whether I "believe" in the signum system or not. If testing shows statistically significant results then shouldn't this data stand on it's own? suppose there had been some other system which claimed these results but you didn't know how the bets were chosen, would you choose to ignore the results in that case?

I don't really expect any answers. I think you're only doing this out of boredom.

[Landis]

My point has been made.  Moving onward.

[Davey-Jones]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

OMG malcop! Your posts had me in tears! It's so rare on this forum to find someone with such a great sense of humour!

[malcop]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

OMG malcop! Your posts had me in tears! It's so rare on this forum to find someone with such a great sense of humour!

I'm glad you liked it.

[malcop]

-