ChAoS

[pins]

the bottom line is can you make a profit from patterns.  as no casino will let you use a computer, its a waste of time to discuss them.  i see loads of reds and blacks following . but how do i take advantage of this,

[iggiv]

Read John Patrick

[I have cookies]

Read John Patrick

[iggiv]

whats your point, Cookies?   

[cheese]

Another contradiction.  If roulette "appears" to have patterns and we can see them and identify them when they happen, then the game itself is indeed producing patterns.

Nope, not true. Clouds are random events that are constantly changing. Ever see what looks like a face in a cloud formation? We all have. Does that mean clouds are are producing faces? Hardly. They're producing random formations that APPEAR to be faces. Just like roulette produces results that appear to be patterns. In reality, the patterns are all in your head. Thats why they're not dependable to beat the game. If they were, it would have been verified 200 years ago, and so far it hasn't.

Here's a cloud that looks like Mark Twain. Wanna bet on it?

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Nope, not true. Clouds are random events that are constantly changing. Ever see what looks like a face in a cloud formation? We all have. Does that mean clouds are are producing faces? Hardly. They're producing random formations that APPEAR to be faces. Just like roulette produces results that appear to be patterns. In reality, the patterns are all in your head. Thats why they're not dependable to beat the game.

Then if the only way to "beat the game" is through chaos, what is the best way to play a chaotic game.

[cheese]

Then if the only way to "beat the game" is through chaos, what is the best way to play a chaotic game.

Look how they beat Blackjack. They invented another game, outside the game of BJ, called card counting. Just like roulette, BJ was considered unbeatable. I compare what I see going on in the sequence from a roulette wheel, to what I've experienced in thousands of hours of practice. Then I make an educated guess. No rules, chaos doesn't respond to rules. Just knowledge from experience. Instinct. The way a riveter doesn't fall off a high rise building, he's had thousands of hours of practice and instinct takes over.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Look how they beat Blackjack. They invented another game, outside the game of BJ, called card counting. Just like roulette, BJ was considered unbeatable. I compare what I see going on in the sequence from a roulette wheel, to what I've experienced in thousands of hours of practice. Then I make an educated guess. No rules, chaos doesn't respond to rules. Just knowledge from experience. Instinct. The way a riveter doesn't fall off a high rise building, he's had thousands of hours of practice and instinct takes over.

And if chaos is the game, and you are not following patterns, trends, or streaks.  What exactly allows you to make chaotic educated guesses?

[cheese]

 What exactly allows you to make chaotic educated guesses?

Experience. I don't follow anything in particular, I follow everything. I see it all as one, not fragmented parts.  Never think 'this is a good bet' or 'this is a bad bet'. Never wait for conditions to get better. With random outcome, there is no 'better' time to bet. First you have to learn to read the random. Betting before then us useless.

[schoenpoetser]

On internet I also play BJ.From the outcomes of BJ you can make statistic stats.I use theses statistic events to play BJ.It is very successful but the profit is very poor.Cart counting has no sense.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Experience. I don't follow anything in particular, I follow everything. I see it all as one, not fragmented parts.  Never think 'this is a good bet' or 'this is a bad bet'. Never wait for conditions to get better. With random outcome, there is no 'better' time to bet. First you have to learn to read the random. Betting before then us useless.

I have a lot of experience seeing random outcomes, I see changes, and I see overall trends.  You are not following anything specific with regards to patterns, trends etc...  you are looking at the game as a whole in a more general way and playing for it to continue or change if a change is evident.

[iggiv]

Experience. I don't follow anything in particular, I follow everything. I see it all as one, not fragmented parts.  Never think 'this is a good bet' or 'this is a bad bet'. Never wait for conditions to get better. With random outcome, there is no 'better' time to bet. First you have to learn to read the random. Betting before then us useless.

how can u read the random? Gizmotron says the same, still u ridicule him. Can u give me example how to 'read random'?

[cheese]

>>how can u read the random? Gizmotron says the same, still u ridicule him.

>>

Thats because he can't do it. Look at the results of his 'Proof Demo', he bet 6 times and lost $360 and quit playing. He promised to make 100 bets. Does that sound like somebody who reads random? He says 'So what? I lose all the time.' So why didn't he keep going then? 6 bets is almost less than nothing.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Experience. I don't follow anything in particular, I follow everything. I see it all as one, not fragmented parts.  Never think 'this is a good bet' or 'this is a bad bet'. Never wait for conditions to get better. With random outcome, there is no 'better' time to bet. First you have to learn to read the random. Betting before then us useless.

Understood, but if you are only looking at the past 5 spins bc everything else is useless in a chaotic game, why the need to write down the results on pen and paper?  It's fairly easy to see the random 5 spins deep, even 10 spins deep.  I can understand writing down results 15-20 spins deep, but why only 5?  Five spins can be read just looking at the marquee with a quick visual.

[cheese]

Understood, but if you are only looking at the past 5 spins

I don't know what you're talking about. Who said anything about 5 spins? It wasn't me.

[cheese]

-