Too Many Sleepers System - 1k Spins Tested So Far

[rjeaton1]

Before I get flamed for posting a system with "1k Spins Tested" in the title, let me explain.  I have posted systems here before with less test spins done, and while they did work, I just thought it would be unfair of me to post a system here without any spins tested.  I have also attached at the bottom the 1k test spins as well as a snapshot of the BR balance trend.

So, yes I did test it, am I aware that 1k spins is really nothing in the grand scheme of things, yes I am.  But at least you can use those 1k spins as a benchmark for whether or not you'd even like to test this system out.

So, now that I've got me "Don't Flame Me Preface" out of the way, here is the system.

You wait track 37 spins of the wheel and bet on all of the numbers that haven't hit.  (I know, pretty simple compared to the last two systems I posted).
On a win, you start tracking a new set of 37 spins (not re-tracking the previous 37 spins.  My thought process for this is that you'll have less exposure to the strange dispersion of numbers that "random" produces.  Meaning, if you just re-tracked the previous 37 spins from the point  when you win, every time you do that you're getting closer and closer to "random" just continuing to pick the numbers that have already come out.  Just my thought process...)

You can use a progression if you'd like, or you can try it flat betting.  The 1k test spins I did were done with a negative progression (up as you lose).

So while I know a lot of you are thinking "Wow, what a great system.  A negative progression on a negative earnings game AND you're betting on numbers that haven't appeared...that's just great".

The idea behind this system isn't betting on one or two sleepers.  You're actually betting on every sleeper that hasn't appeared in 37 spins or so.  What that means is you're essentially betting on the fact that the same exact numbers aren't going to come out in the next 37 spins.  So far I have not gotten past the eighth step of the progression.  Will it happen?  I'm sure it will.

Sorry about all my "extras" in this post, but I figured if I got all the things the "naysayers" might say out of the way now, that maybe that wouldn't bother posting what I already said twice.

[rjeaton1]

Oh, and don't mind the "modified perfect balance system" at the bottom of the BR Balance Trend picture I posted.  It's just the system that I used last, and even though I have it as in-active it still shows up at the bottom of the picture for some reason.

[celiza427]

Hey, welcome back RJ    New system looks good, didn't go lower than approx $60 of your initial bankroll.  I've played a similar system but I was RE-Tracking the last 36 spins which ended up in some pretty bad runs.  I do like the idea of starting the tracking process over - maybe it'll go better this time 

[rjeaton1]

Hey, thanks Celiza!  I've just been really busy, I've actually got everything set up (finally) to get another system of mine coded into a roulette bot (that's the reason for my disappearance).

[rjeaton1]

Alright, here are another set of 1k spins tested, the only difference being is that these 1k spins are the first 1k spins from the 700k spin set that HomeIto uploaded (it's in the downloads section). 

The graph looks pretty much the same as the 1k spins I tested from an RNG, but there was one pretty large drawdown (a little over 400 units.) Although if you have the capability to bet a an online or B&M casino that offers bet amounts below 1 dollar (say .10) then that would only be a 40 dollar drawdown and a net win of +58 units.

[RPro75]

I'm glad that your disappearance had nothing to do with the negative posters as of late.  Keep up the great work, RJ.

[celiza427]

Very cool RJ, let me know how the bot goes - very interested in that.  I'll see if I can at minimum get a 100 spin test thrown in here, I'm intrigued about playing this system while starting my tracking process over.  Might have been that 1 step I was missing that made me lose my $$ lol

[Kingspin]

I tried a turbo genius system similar to this . The thing i don't like is the big draw downs of 400 + chips which happens all too often.

[mr.ore]

Such system like this won't work in long run, and may not run even in a short run.    I have just coded a simulation of your system, and I have tried similar aproaches, and my conclusion is, that it is not the way.    On the other way, those kind of systems are the better ones in my opinions, because they can go up even from big loss, but it is just random walk.    There is result of simulation for 100000 spins with ranlux389 random number generator from GNU Scientific Library, where you can see, that that there may be good runs, but also big loses.    I used no progression, just flat betting.    Play this only with flat betting, and only if you feel like gambling, but expect to lose.  

[mr.ore]

-