VLS Roulette Forum

Main => Brainstorming => Topic started by: fqbien on June 17, 2009, 12:21:38 PM

Title: just want your opinion about it
Post by: fqbien on June 17, 2009, 12:21:38 PM
Ok, i was looking at the systems on the forum, and i discovered this :
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/full-systems/the-safest-roulette-system-in-the-world/

The system told us to bet 3chips on 1-18 sector and 2chips on the 3rd dozen, covering a lot of numbers.
I've tried some spins from the original system, and seen that 3-4 or 5 bets can loses, making a big drawdown.
And like the system tell it, we have to make a progression on a loose :
3/2 , if loose 9/6, if win bet again 9/6 ( for recovering and get +1 chip ), if win go back to 3/2.

But, while trying, i've also seen that sometimes, you have it:

Spin     
20   bet 3/2 looses
14   bet 9/6 win
21   bet 9/6 looses
15   bet 33/22 win
23   bet 33/22 looses
35   bet 74/36 win
19   bet 74/36 looses
etc ...

So, the "new system" i'm trying is inspired a lot of it, whit just one difference : the progression.
I just bet 3 on 1-18 and 2 on the third dozen.
I'm trying it with fun money at BetVoyager no zero-wheel, with the auto mode.
I started at 140 chips and after 500 spins up of +100.

If somebody can make a simulation of it to let the test more rapidly, it will be interesting to see how it goes.
By my side, i continue the test too.

Please give your opinion on it, positive or negative, or feedbacks if somebody already tested it.

Thanks and sorry for my english.

Title: Re: just want your opinion about it
Post by: VLSroulette on June 17, 2009, 12:48:07 PM
Hi mate, it is the same as betting 5 Double-Streets.

Lay 5, get back 6. I think you should focus is finding some money management on 5 lanes which can go with it and you are the right track :)

I believe Matty played those for a profit at a stage of his roulette betting. You may want to ask him.
Title: Re: just want your opinion about it
Post by: VLSroulette on June 17, 2009, 12:50:01 PM
By the way, Matty = user "MattyMattz".

Best regards.