Its is amazing what you can do with a shitty selection and trending.

[Mike]

I am dutch and I tried to find in my dictionary what means shitty selection.No answer.What is the meaning of  FTL  , DBL and GG ??

   

"shitty bet selection" means bad bet selection, which doesn't really make much sense because they are all equally bad (or good, whatever you prefer).

FTL means play the same outcome which came out last. So if red just hit, you bet red, if black, bet black etc. DBL means you play the same as the outcome before last (avant dernier). GG is the name of another gambling forum.

[I have cookies]

"shitty bet selection" means bad bet selection, which doesn't really make much sense because they are all equally bad (or good, whatever you prefer).

Yes

So what is the point using progressions or a bet selection when they all produce the same results - part of illusion when you can gain the same amount flat betting when you aim for +1 no matter what you play with or against.

If you can gain 1K using progression you can also gain 1K flat betting - same stuff no matter how you twist it ...

Gamblers Fallacy ...

Follow the last outcome by Kelly 5 attempts to gain +2 units...

January 2000 Flat betting

1.1 +2
2.1 +2
3.1 -5
4.1 +2
5.1 -5
6.1 -5
7.1 -5
8.1 +2
9.1 +2
10.1 -5
11.1 +2
12.1 -5
13.1 +2
14.1 -5
15.1 +2
16.1 +2
17.1 +2
18.1 +2
19.1 +2
20.1 +2
21.1 +2
22.1 +2
23.1 +2
24.1 -5
25.1 +2
26.1 +2
27.1 +2
28.1 +2
29.1 -5
30.1 -5
31.1 -5

Loss 55 units
Won 40 units

Waves 2 attempts with out house edge to gain +1 and ride to gain +11.

731
Flat betting ...

20110225 +8
20110226 +0
20110227 +0
20110228 +11
20110301 +11
20110302 +1
20110303 +11
20110304 +0
20110305 +11
20110306 +1
20110307 +11
20110308 -14
20110309 +11
20110310 +8
20110311 +8
20110312 +11
20110313 -14
20110314 +11
20110315 +11
20110316 +0
20110317 -14
20110318 +11
20110319 +11

147 won
 42 loss
   2 even

+105 total = 1K

Due to positive fluctation  

[Nathan Detroit]

Cookie,

I never talked about 37 degree freedom.  You are so opionated that you don`t even know  who posts what. .

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[I have cookies]

Cookie,

I never talked about 37 degree freedom.  You are so opionated that you don`t even know  who posts what. You are a bore.

Yeah, , we know  key board BS winnings.You never won a diime in a  B & M casino. Maybe  1 k in pennoes on line.

Ok by me i have no issue with that at all ...
So tomorrow i post the results for 20110323 ... what else is new :-)

[Zindrod]

I have  Cookies,

My advice to you get a  new  translator service. You did not grasp  the  post by Nathan Detroit. Better yet go to a  B & M casino first and   [;ay your great system then tell us  how it feels  getting you tochask licked.

N.D.

"I have cookies" does not explain that well. I see this often. Alot of good research from guys who know what they are doing but because of factors like, other first languages etc. do not always come over clearly. Does not mean that "I have cookies" work is of no value. I also do not believe in systems. His work is interesting though. Pity that guys like Nathan has to attack him. Personally I feel that if you find it a bore then go look at someone elses red/black system where you have a straight forward simple rule or two for playing it. 

[birdhands]

Its is amazing what you can do with a shitty selection and trending.


The selection is that you ride two horses at the same time and pick the one that generate the first win.
You wait for one loss and then place one bet no matter witch of the two distributions that show up first.

The sequence line 1.
If you see one isolated singel you observe twice that next will be a series of singels.
If you have or see a series of singels you observe twice that you will get one isolated singel.

The sequence line 2.
If you see one singel series you observe twice that next will be a series of series.
If you have or see a series of series you observe twice that you will get one singel serie.

Cookie, I know you have little patience with questions, explaining yourself, etc, but I could use a little clarification here.  Any chance you could give an example of a selection of spins and label these terms?  Or I could guess:
R
R
R
B
B
R
R this is a series of series?

R
B
R
B
R  this is a series of singles?

R
R
B
B
B
R  isolated single?  followed by...
B
R  ..a series of singles?

"If you have or see a series of series you observe twice that you will get one singel series."  I still don't understand this one.

Thanks,

Sam

[I have cookies]

I send you PM .


R
R
R
B = Previous is one isolated singel series
R
R = Previous is one isolated singel outcome
B
B
B
R
B = Previous is series of series
R
R = Previous is one series of singel outcomes
R
B
R
R = Previous is one isolated singel series
R = Previous is one isolated singel outcome
B
R
B
R
B
R
R = Previous is a series of singels
R

[birdhands]

Thanks, that helps.

Ok, so the "two horses" are sequence line 1 and sequence line 2, right?

[birdhands]

I send you PM .


R
R
R
B = Previous is one isolated singel series
R
R = Previous is one isolated singel outcome
B
B
B
R
B = Previous is series of series
R
R = Previous is one series of singel outcomes
R
B
R
R = Previous is one isolated singel series
R = Previous is one isolated singel outcomethis one is confusing, the previous is R R, which seems to be an isolated single series
B
R
B
R
B
R
R = Previous is a series of singels
R

[I have cookies]

How to observe the outcomes as formations of waves.

Explanation 1.

If you only observe singels - then they will come as one isolated singel or series of singels.
Conclusion is that one isolated singel or a series of singels - two opposites as in 1/2 or as the difference between red and black.

RRRBRR = Here is one black as isolated singel.

RBRRRR = Here RB is a series of two singels in a row.

The observation of the distribution dictates that the amount of singel isolated outcomes is the same as all series of singels (no matter length) as in 1/2.

Explanation 2.

If you only observe series - then they will come as one isolated series or series of series.
Conclusion is that one isolated singel series or a series of series is two opposites as in 1/2 or as the difference between red and black.

RBRRRBR = Here is one isolated singel series.

RBRRRBBBRB = Here is a two series after each other, series of series, two in a row.

The observation of the distribution dictates that the amount of singel isolated series is the same as all series of series (no matter length) as in 1/2.

Note:
The two lines has to calibrate and find correlation to become a pure state with only series present or singles present using two distributions at the same momentum witch will generate a loss of four - when each side gain one fictive loss each you can place two bets - that is one way among many - that is what the results of previous posts are based upon - flat betting.

[I have cookies]

Well I assume I will test this for 1000 placed bets as the The Van Keelen Test dictates.

A system indicates a genuine superiority:
1. if after 1000 placed bets a gain of more than 100 units was obtained!

I am sure it will fail - but still its amusing and fun ... so far positive fluctuation produce 1K using 731 witch eliminate the house edge, so I wondering if it will hold or tank after 1000 placed bets.

I will post every original file from random org with date and the file it self so you can following and confirm the file.
Clear strict rules and the amount of placed bets so we also can get the final STD after we see what the net gain is after 1000 placed bets.

[schoenpoetser]

IHC:I understand what you mean with isolated events ,but I have no idea what when and where I have to place my bets.

[Bombpyrotechnic]

well. . . .  . this is diferent with other  tipsters. . . . . .  . becouse we are all diferent with guesing. . . . . thats why it its make. . . diference with. . . practice and. . . propper. . .  . understanding game which you. . . .  . play. . .  . just my opinion. . . . . .  . about some kind of gambling. . . .  . i  sometime stuck. . .  . .  trapped between. . . bet selection. . . as well. . . .  . 

[I have cookies]

IHC:I understand what you mean with isolated events ,but I have no idea what when and where I have to place my bets.

I will make it clear with next post and with results from random org 20110201 to 20110228 with placed bets, net gain and original files that you can follow and confirm.

[I have cookies]

well. . . .  . this is diferent with other  tipsters. . . . . .  . becouse we are all diferent with guesing. . . . . thats why it its make. . . diference with. . . practice and. . . propper. . .  . understanding game which you. . . .  . play. . .  . just my opinion. . . . . .  . about some kind of gambling. . . .  . I  sometime stuck. . .  . .  trapped between. . . bet selection. . . as well. . . .  . 

Its not about educated guess work - but there is a random momentum where two lines of the distribution has to produce periodic momentum and generate periodicity of a random momentum where two lines calibrate and achieve correlation towards 4 loses and achieve two straight loses.

[I have cookies]

-