WRX - Steve Morgan - roulettesystem

[roul.ette]

Hi, I am a new member here and would be interested to hear, if someone has heard from Steve Morgan`sroulette system.
He claims to win nearly all bets (his win rate is 18 or 19 wins out of 20 runs).

He offers in a roulette forum:

Now I have a robust strategy that makes me a consistent profit every time I go to the casino
If you're really interested I could send you a free copy.

If you send an e-mail to him he never replies!!!

Does anybody know this guy?

Is he a fake? or does he want to collect e-mail- adresses for some purposes ?

friendly

roul.ette

[hoper35]

Probably. 

[NoBody]

Hi roul.ette,

I can clearly tell you that Steve Morgan is not a fake.

He did reply my email last year when i contacted him.

He is a friendly guy and definitely not a scammer.

You can ask Victor more about him. Steve Morgan used to be a member of this forum too...i think he still is.

You can still find his post about even bets in this forum. Just search "steve morgan"...

I am sorry roul.ette that he didn't reply your email. Maybe he is busy at the moment.


@hoper35 -  Steve Morgan is a good man as far as I know him mate 

All the best to you all!

Regards,
NoBody ^.^

[RoulettePlayer]

Roul.ette,
I don't really know him, but he's from New Zealand and he used to make regular appearances at Steve/Stefano's forum.  I thought he closed his roulette sales (Aardvark as I recall) and was giving his systems away for free.  Which system(s) are you looking for sleeping doz...? EC or double doz history not repeating?  or is he selling something else?  RP

[See_Jerek]

Hi, I am a new member here and would be interested to hear, if someone has heard from Steve Morgan`sroulette system.
He claims to win nearly all bets (his win rate is 18 or 19 wins out of 20 runs).

He offers in a roulette forum:

Now I have a robust strategy that makes me a consistent profit every time I go to the casino
If you're really interested I could send you a free copy.

If you send an e-mail to him he never replies!!!

Does anybody know this guy?

Is he a fake? or does he want to collect e-mail- adresses for some purposes ?

friendly

roul.ette

That is all true.Steve Morgan bets big puts down 2 big bets to achieve his target profit.
Using an LW registry he waits for a trigger LLLL bet for a w.Sometimes it come quickly sometimes you can wait the whole day at the casino and it will never come,that is according to Steve.

Hope this helps

[roul.ette]

@RoulettePlayer

I am looking for his last system (the system with which he is loosing only one bet within 30 or 20 bets - I don t know the exact number of plays) with an extreme high hit-quote (it sounds unbelievable and I can t imagine that this exists)- it could be a dozen strategy.
If you know more about I would be happy if you can give me some information


@ See_Jerek

thank you for the hint.
I ll test this "LLLL then betting"- strategy.

[See_Jerek]

@RoulettePlayer

I am looking for his last system (the system with which he is losing only one bet within 30 or 20 bets - I don t know the exact number of plays) with an extreme high hit-quote (it sounds unbelievable and I can t imagine that this exists)- it could be a dozen strategy.
If you know more about I would be happy if you can give me some information


@ See_Jerek

thank you for the hint.
I ll test this "LLLL then betting"- strategy.

It is a double dozen/column.I think that hit rate is possible......BUT take note he does hit and run sessions not continous play.
With a BR of 500,he bets $100 on each dozen with a insurance bet of $10 on zero.Outlay of $210 for a return of $100.
His target a session is $200 which simply means he needs to win 2 times only.Well I think its highly possible

[roul.ette]

It is a double dozen/column.I think that hit rate is possible......BUT take note he does hit and run sessions not continous play.
With a BR of 500,he bets $100 on each dozen with a insurance bet of $10 on zero.Outlay of $210 for a return of $100.
His target a session is $200 which simply means he needs to win 2 times only.Well I think its highly possible

If you wait e.g. for a doz/col to repeat 4 times (then its LLLL for the other 2 doz/columns) and then play this other 2 doz/col , I can`t imagine there is a hit rate more than expected within the "Law of the Third".
When its a hit and run strategy, I think there will be some days with following loosing streaks and so you can not win 18 or 19 times within 20.

My last session in an OC showed in dozens (more than 3 streaks):

4 times dozen 2(17,20,13,23) = win
5 times col. 1 (1,4,34,7,19) = loss
5 times col.3(30,12,24,27,15) = loss

this was within 108 spins, if this would be on 3 different days :
par ex.
today :4 times dozen 2(17,20,13,23) = win
tomorrow: 5 times col. 1 (1,4,34,7,19) = loss

one day next week: 5 times col.3(30,12,24,27,15) = loss

So if i ve played this as hit and run, I would need  38 winning days to get the 19 wins out of 20 days or 36 winning days to get the 18 wins  out of 40.

This seems to be like magic, or Mr. Steve Morgan is a magician.

friendly

roul.ette

[See_Jerek]

If you wait e.g. for a doz/col to repeat 4 times (then its LLLL for the other 2 doz/columns) and then play this other 2 doz/col , I can`t imagine there is a hit rate more than expected within the "Law of the Third".
When its a hit and run strategy, I think there will be some days with following losing streaks and so you can not win 18 or 19 times within 20.

My last session in an OC showed in dozens (more than 3 streaks):

4 times dozen 2(17,20,13,23) = win
5 times col. 1 (1,4,34,7,19) = loss
5 times col.3(30,12,24,27,15) = loss

this was within 108 spins, if this would be on 3 different days :
par ex.
today :4 times dozen 2(17,20,13,23) = win
tomorrow: 5 times col. 1 (1,4,34,7,19) = loss

one day next week: 5 times col.3(30,12,24,27,15) = loss

So if I ve played this as hit and run, I would need  38 winning days to get the 19 wins out of 20 days or 36 winning days to get the 18 wins  out of 40.

This seems to be like magic, or Mr. Steve Morgan is a magician.

friendly

roul.ette

No his method is based on trends and breaks

[roul.ette]

No his method is based on trends and breaks

Do you know more about?

roul.ette

[madupz4]

I talked to him last yr, and the method he uses daily is his "History not repeating" strategy using 2 dozens.

-He looks at the past 4 dozens hit, (he tries to wait for a good balance, meaning dozen 1, dozen2, dozen 1, dozen 3..rather than 3222).

He then bets against that sequence from happening on the next spin, using a 4 step progression.

So if the last 4 spins were 1,2,3,2.
-He would bet against that from happening again, as in the title "History not repeating."
So to bet against 1,2,3,2 from happening, his first bet would be to bet against the "1" so here he would bet on dozen's 2 and 3.  If he loses, he goes up one step in his progression and now bets against the "2" from appearing, so he would bet dozen's 1 and 3.

He used to use a HIGH progression, something like 50,50, then 100,100, then 300,300, then 900,900, but now he just waits for the 1 opportunity for the 4th number not to repeat, which would mean he's betting against the entire sequence from repeating, but only placing one bet.  He is VERY patient and sometimes waits 8 hours for this to happen.  He says, it usually happens once per day.  So he actually sits at the table for sometimes 5,6,7,8 hours waiting for this to happen, then bets against it from happening!

If he wins, he goes home a winner.  If he loses, he comes back the next day and does it again.

He bets 250,250 on each dozen.  So a win gives him +250.  A loss gives him -500.  It does win more than it loses but it requires ALOT of patience!

[ikarianman]

why would you have to wait?why not play with the last 4 numbers all the time?wouldn't work the same way?

[TwoCatSam]

Madupz4

I bought his system from him and the one you describe is not the one I bought.  Perhaps he changed horses.

Sam

[madupz4]

Madupz4

I bought his system from him and the one you describe is not the one I bought.  Perhaps he changed horses.

Sam

TCS,

Well I know he had two systems, one using even chances and the one I described above.  When I spoke to him personally over several emails, he said he uses the one I described above on a regular basis.

[madupz4]

why would you have to wait?why not play with the last 4 numbers all the time?wouldn't work the same way?

He waited b/c he was not interested in winning a small amount, and risking his progression.  He would rather just wait to bet the table limit and go home with a maximum profit.

So if the table limit was 500.00 per outside bet, he would bet 250 and 250 on two dozens.

[madupz4]

-